Principal Evaluation in Indiana: Practitioners' Perceptions of a New Statewide Model

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Principal Evaluation in Indiana: Practitioners' Perceptions of a New Statewide Model
Language: English
Authors: Andrews, Kelly A., Boyland, Lori G., Quick, Marilynn M.
Source: Education Leadership Review. Dec 2016 17(2):36-55.
Availability: NCPEA Publications. Available from: National Council of Professors of Educational Administration. Web site: http://www.ncpeapublications.org/
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 20
Publication Date: 2016
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Descriptors: Principals, Administrator Evaluation, School Districts, State Legislation, Superintendents, Feedback (Response), Educational Change, Educational Policy, Mixed Methods Research, Models, Administrator Attitudes, Administrator Qualifications, Public Schools, Administrator Surveys, Rating Scales, Likert Scales
Geographic Terms: Indiana
ISSN: 1532-0723
Abstract: This study examines administrators' perspectives of a state-developed principal evaluation model adopted by a majority of Indiana school districts after legislation mandated policy reform in educator evaluation. Feedback was gathered from public school superintendents (the evaluators) and principals (those being evaluated), with 364 participants. Mixed-methods analyses revealed areas of model utility, implementation challenges, and statistically significant differences between principals' and superintendents' perceptions of model efficacy. Both superintendents and principals agreed the new model was an improvement over traditional, locally developed models; however, superintendents rated the model higher in efficacy and implementation fidelity. Principal participants did not perceive the new model to be effective for principal evaluation and would not recommend the model to colleagues. Implications for future policy development in educator evaluation include the integration of findings from essential evaluative research. Recommendations for practice include suggestions for facilitating field-based support when developing and implementing evaluative models.
Abstractor: As Provided
Number of References: 49
Entry Date: 2016
Access URL: https://www.ncpeapublications.org/index.php/volume-17-number-2-fall-2016
Accession Number: EJ1124037
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
CustomLinks:
  – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1124037
    Name: ERIC Full Text
    Category: fullText
    Text: Full Text from ERIC
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: EJ1124037
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Principal Evaluation in Indiana: Practitioners' Perceptions of a New Statewide Model
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Andrews%2C+Kelly+A%2E%22">Andrews, Kelly A.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Boyland%2C+Lori+G%2E%22">Boyland, Lori G.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Quick%2C+Marilynn+M%2E%22">Quick, Marilynn M.</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Education+Leadership+Review%22"><i>Education Leadership Review</i></searchLink>. Dec 2016 17(2):36-55.
– Name: Avail
  Label: Availability
  Group: Avail
  Data: NCPEA Publications. Available from: National Council of Professors of Educational Administration. Web site: http://www.ncpeapublications.org/
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Y
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 20
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2016
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Principals%22">Principals</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Administrator+Evaluation%22">Administrator Evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22School+Districts%22">School Districts</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22State+Legislation%22">State Legislation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Superintendents%22">Superintendents</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Feedback+%28Response%29%22">Feedback (Response)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Change%22">Educational Change</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Policy%22">Educational Policy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mixed+Methods+Research%22">Mixed Methods Research</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Models%22">Models</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Administrator+Attitudes%22">Administrator Attitudes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Administrator+Qualifications%22">Administrator Qualifications</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Public+Schools%22">Public Schools</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Administrator+Surveys%22">Administrator Surveys</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Rating+Scales%22">Rating Scales</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Likert+Scales%22">Likert Scales</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Indiana%22">Indiana</searchLink>
– Name: ISSN
  Label: ISSN
  Group: ISSN
  Data: 1532-0723
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: This study examines administrators' perspectives of a state-developed principal evaluation model adopted by a majority of Indiana school districts after legislation mandated policy reform in educator evaluation. Feedback was gathered from public school superintendents (the evaluators) and principals (those being evaluated), with 364 participants. Mixed-methods analyses revealed areas of model utility, implementation challenges, and statistically significant differences between principals' and superintendents' perceptions of model efficacy. Both superintendents and principals agreed the new model was an improvement over traditional, locally developed models; however, superintendents rated the model higher in efficacy and implementation fidelity. Principal participants did not perceive the new model to be effective for principal evaluation and would not recommend the model to colleagues. Implications for future policy development in educator evaluation include the integration of findings from essential evaluative research. Recommendations for practice include suggestions for facilitating field-based support when developing and implementing evaluative models.
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: As Provided
– Name: Ref
  Label: Number of References
  Group: RefInfo
  Data: 49
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2016
– Name: URL
  Label: Access URL
  Group: URL
  Data: <link linkTarget="URL" linkTerm="https://www.ncpeapublications.org/index.php/volume-17-number-2-fall-2016" linkWindow="_blank">http://www.ncpeapublications.org/index.php/volume-17-number-2-fall-2016</link>
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: EJ1124037
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1124037
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 20
        StartPage: 36
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Principals
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Administrator Evaluation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: School Districts
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: State Legislation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Superintendents
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Feedback (Response)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Educational Change
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Educational Policy
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Mixed Methods Research
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Models
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Administrator Attitudes
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Administrator Qualifications
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Public Schools
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Administrator Surveys
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Rating Scales
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Likert Scales
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Indiana
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Principal Evaluation in Indiana: Practitioners' Perceptions of a New Statewide Model
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Andrews, Kelly A.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Boyland, Lori G.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Quick, Marilynn M.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 12
              Type: published
              Y: 2016
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 1532-0723
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 17
            – Type: issue
              Value: 2
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Education Leadership Review
              Type: main
ResultId 1