View in EDS PDF Full Text

Rapid Reviews in Health Policy: A Study of Intended Use in the New South Wales' Evidence Check Programme

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Rapid Reviews in Health Policy: A Study of Intended Use in the New South Wales' Evidence Check Programme
Language: English
Authors: Moore, Gabriel Mary, Redman, Sally, Turner, Tari, Haines, Mary
Source: Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice. Nov 2016 12(4):505-519.
Availability: Policy Press. University of Bristol, 1-9 Old Park Hill, Bristol BS2 8BB, UK. Tel: +44-117-954-5940; e-mail: pp-info@policypress.co.uk; Web site: https://policypress.co.uk/journals/evidence-and-policy
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 15
Publication Date: 2016
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Descriptors: Health Services, Research Utilization, Evidence Based Practice, Policy Formation, Public Policy, Meta Analysis, Review (Reexamination), Operations Research, Planning Commissions, State Agencies, Decision Making, Inferences, Foreign Countries
Geographic Terms: Australia
DOI: 10.1332/174426415X14446635524057
ISSN: 1744-2648
Abstract: Rapid reviews of research are a key way in which policy makers use research. This paper examines 74 rapid reviews commissioned by health policy agencies through the Sax Institute's Evidence Check programme. We examine what prompted policy makers to commission rapid reviews, their purpose, how and when they intended to use them, and how this varied by agency. Policy makers commissioned rapid reviews primarily as part of planned policy processes and to identify alternative solutions to problems. Government departments responsible for multiple policy domains were more likely to commission rapid reviews for agenda setting and to test new ideas.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2017
Accession Number: EJ1129550
Database: ERIC
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
    Url: https://content.ebscohost.com/cds/retrieve?content=AQICAHj0k_4E0hTGH8RJwT4gCJyBsGNe_WN95AvKlDbXJGqwxwG5BmLdaVlckH2TjotgDPkiAAAA4jCB3wYJKoZIhvcNAQcGoIHRMIHOAgEAMIHIBgkqhkiG9w0BBwEwHgYJYIZIAWUDBAEuMBEEDIyktJvjkjKBjS3CfwIBEICBmvTxdugZG9ayaM-vsjP-arTcEFPaY8Ra8YKVetI0aYp6LMjJ0BOQ8TLEfsMJbEFOufwVyT0m33qbTtEFR-J6FcSRzBVwFCLHwgmHEFHwO3yVxsaaDzfC2WlVWWizUMnqy8-WOPY5uPkqVNVBx4J0tcpRNWzkoZrFBwlE9K-p3ZXzmSMgBW3lF7LJ4ZBLb3BXCwzUCWc_pX4TJcQ=
Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: EJ1129550
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Rapid Reviews in Health Policy: A Study of Intended Use in the New South Wales' Evidence Check Programme
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Moore%2C+Gabriel+Mary%22">Moore, Gabriel Mary</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Redman%2C+Sally%22">Redman, Sally</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Turner%2C+Tari%22">Turner, Tari</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Haines%2C+Mary%22">Haines, Mary</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Evidence+%26+Policy%3A+A+Journal+of+Research%2C+Debate+and+Practice%22"><i>Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice</i></searchLink>. Nov 2016 12(4):505-519.
– Name: Avail
  Label: Availability
  Group: Avail
  Data: Policy Press. University of Bristol, 1-9 Old Park Hill, Bristol BS2 8BB, UK. Tel: +44-117-954-5940; e-mail: pp-info@policypress.co.uk; Web site: https://policypress.co.uk/journals/evidence-and-policy
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Y
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 15
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2016
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Health+Services%22">Health Services</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+Utilization%22">Research Utilization</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evidence+Based+Practice%22">Evidence Based Practice</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Policy+Formation%22">Policy Formation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Public+Policy%22">Public Policy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Meta+Analysis%22">Meta Analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Review+%28Reexamination%29%22">Review (Reexamination)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Operations+Research%22">Operations Research</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Planning+Commissions%22">Planning Commissions</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22State+Agencies%22">State Agencies</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Decision+Making%22">Decision Making</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Inferences%22">Inferences</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Foreign+Countries%22">Foreign Countries</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Australia%22">Australia</searchLink>
– Name: DOI
  Label: DOI
  Group: ID
  Data: 10.1332/174426415X14446635524057
– Name: ISSN
  Label: ISSN
  Group: ISSN
  Data: 1744-2648
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Rapid reviews of research are a key way in which policy makers use research. This paper examines 74 rapid reviews commissioned by health policy agencies through the Sax Institute's Evidence Check programme. We examine what prompted policy makers to commission rapid reviews, their purpose, how and when they intended to use them, and how this varied by agency. Policy makers commissioned rapid reviews primarily as part of planned policy processes and to identify alternative solutions to problems. Government departments responsible for multiple policy domains were more likely to commission rapid reviews for agenda setting and to test new ideas.
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: As Provided
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2017
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: EJ1129550
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1129550
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1332/174426415X14446635524057
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 15
        StartPage: 505
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Health Services
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Research Utilization
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Evidence Based Practice
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Policy Formation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Public Policy
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Meta Analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Review (Reexamination)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Operations Research
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Planning Commissions
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: State Agencies
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Decision Making
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Inferences
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Foreign Countries
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Australia
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Rapid Reviews in Health Policy: A Study of Intended Use in the New South Wales' Evidence Check Programme
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Moore, Gabriel Mary
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Redman, Sally
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Turner, Tari
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Haines, Mary
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 11
              Type: published
              Y: 2016
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 1744-2648
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 12
            – Type: issue
              Value: 4
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice
              Type: main
ResultId 1