Students' Reasons for Preferring Teleological Explanations
Saved in:
| Title: | Students' Reasons for Preferring Teleological Explanations |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Trommler, Friederike (ORCID |
| Source: | International Journal of Science Education. 2018 40(2):159-187. |
| Availability: | Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 29 |
| Publication Date: | 2018 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research Tests/Questionnaires |
| Education Level: | High Schools |
| Descriptors: | Student Attitudes, Etiology, Preferences, High School Students, Biology, Familiarity, Attribution Theory, Interviews, Task Analysis, Foreign Countries, Science Instruction, Inferences, Thinking Skills, Educational Practices, Questionnaires, Statistical Analysis |
| Geographic Terms: | Germany |
| DOI: | 10.1080/09500693.2017.1404658 |
| ISSN: | 0950-0693 |
| Abstract: | The teleological bias, a major learning obstacle, involves explaining biological phenomena in terms of purposes and goals. To probe the teleological bias, researchers have used acceptance judgement tasks and preference judgement tasks. In the present study, such tasks were used with German high school students (N = 353) for 10 phenomena from human biology, that were explained both teleologically and causally. A sub-sample (n = 26) was interviewed about the reasons for their preferences. The results showed that the students favoured teleological explanations over causal explanations. Although the students explained their preference judgements etiologically (i.e. teleologically and causally), they also referred to a wide range of non-etiological criteria (i.e. familiarity, complexity, relevance and five more criteria). When elaborating on their preference for causal explanations, the students often focused not on the causality of the phenomenon, but on mechanisms whose complexity they found attractive. When explaining their preference for teleological explanations, they often focused not teleologically on purposes and goals, but rather on functions, which they found familiar and relevant. Generally, students' preference judgments rarely allowed for making inferences about causal reasoning and teleological reasoning, an issue that is controversial in the literature. Given that students were largely unaware of causality and teleology, their attention must be directed towards distinguishing between etiological and non-etiological reasoning. Implications for educational practice as well as for future research are discussed. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Number of References: | 65 |
| Entry Date: | 2018 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1165269 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1165269 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Students' Reasons for Preferring Teleological Explanations – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Trommler%2C+Friederike%22">Trommler, Friederike</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7243-7477">0000-0002-7243-7477</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Gresch%2C+Helge%22">Gresch, Helge</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9641-3939">0000-0002-9641-3939</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Hammann%2C+Marcus%22">Hammann, Marcus</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22International+Journal+of+Science+Education%22"><i>International Journal of Science Education</i></searchLink>. 2018 40(2):159-187. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 29 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2018 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research<br />Tests/Questionnaires – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22High+Schools%22">High Schools</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Attitudes%22">Student Attitudes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Etiology%22">Etiology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Preferences%22">Preferences</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22High+School+Students%22">High School Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Biology%22">Biology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Familiarity%22">Familiarity</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Attribution+Theory%22">Attribution Theory</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Interviews%22">Interviews</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Task+Analysis%22">Task Analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Foreign+Countries%22">Foreign Countries</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Science+Instruction%22">Science Instruction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Inferences%22">Inferences</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Thinking+Skills%22">Thinking Skills</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Practices%22">Educational Practices</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Questionnaires%22">Questionnaires</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Statistical+Analysis%22">Statistical Analysis</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Germany%22">Germany</searchLink> – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1080/09500693.2017.1404658 – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 0950-0693 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: The teleological bias, a major learning obstacle, involves explaining biological phenomena in terms of purposes and goals. To probe the teleological bias, researchers have used acceptance judgement tasks and preference judgement tasks. In the present study, such tasks were used with German high school students (N = 353) for 10 phenomena from human biology, that were explained both teleologically and causally. A sub-sample (n = 26) was interviewed about the reasons for their preferences. The results showed that the students favoured teleological explanations over causal explanations. Although the students explained their preference judgements etiologically (i.e. teleologically and causally), they also referred to a wide range of non-etiological criteria (i.e. familiarity, complexity, relevance and five more criteria). When elaborating on their preference for causal explanations, the students often focused not on the causality of the phenomenon, but on mechanisms whose complexity they found attractive. When explaining their preference for teleological explanations, they often focused not teleologically on purposes and goals, but rather on functions, which they found familiar and relevant. Generally, students' preference judgments rarely allowed for making inferences about causal reasoning and teleological reasoning, an issue that is controversial in the literature. Given that students were largely unaware of causality and teleology, their attention must be directed towards distinguishing between etiological and non-etiological reasoning. Implications for educational practice as well as for future research are discussed. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: Ref Label: Number of References Group: RefInfo Data: 65 – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2018 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1165269 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1165269 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1080/09500693.2017.1404658 Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 29 StartPage: 159 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Student Attitudes Type: general – SubjectFull: Etiology Type: general – SubjectFull: Preferences Type: general – SubjectFull: High School Students Type: general – SubjectFull: Biology Type: general – SubjectFull: Familiarity Type: general – SubjectFull: Attribution Theory Type: general – SubjectFull: Interviews Type: general – SubjectFull: Task Analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Foreign Countries Type: general – SubjectFull: Science Instruction Type: general – SubjectFull: Inferences Type: general – SubjectFull: Thinking Skills Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational Practices Type: general – SubjectFull: Questionnaires Type: general – SubjectFull: Statistical Analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Germany Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Students' Reasons for Preferring Teleological Explanations Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Trommler, Friederike – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Gresch, Helge – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Hammann, Marcus IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2018 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 0950-0693 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 40 – Type: issue Value: 2 Titles: – TitleFull: International Journal of Science Education Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |