Peer Assessment in MOOCs: The Relationship between Peer Reviewers' Ability and Authors' Essay Performance

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Peer Assessment in MOOCs: The Relationship between Peer Reviewers' Ability and Authors' Essay Performance
Language: English
Authors: Huisman, Bart, Admiraal, Wilfri, Pilli, Olga, van de Ven, Maarten, Saab, Nadira
Source: British Journal of Educational Technology. Jan 2018 49(1):101-110.
Availability: Wiley-Blackwell. 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148. Tel: 800-835-6770; Tel: 781-388-8598; Fax: 781-388-8232; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: http://www.wiley.com/WileyCDA
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 10
Publication Date: 2018
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: Higher Education
Descriptors: Correlation, Peer Evaluation, Essays, Authors, Online Courses, Mass Instruction, Accreditation (Institutions), Ability Grouping, Instructional Design, College Students, Writing Evaluation
DOI: 10.1111/bjet.12520
ISSN: 0007-1013
Abstract: In a relatively short period of time, massive open online courses (MOOCs) have become a considerable topic of research and debate, and the number of available MOOCs is rapidly growing. Along with issues of formal recognition and accreditation, this growth in the number of MOOCs being developed increases the relevance of assessment quality. Within the context of a typical xMOOC, the current study focuses on peer assessment of essay assignments. In the literature, two contradicting theoretical arguments can be found: that learners should be matched with same-ability peers (homogeneously) versus that students should be matched with different-ability peers (heterogeneously). Considering these arguments, the relationship between peer reviewers' ability and authors' essay performance is explored. Results indicate that peer reviewers' ability is positively related to authors' essay performance. Moreover, this relationship is only established for intermediate and high ability authors; essay performance of lower ability authors appeared not to be related to the ability of their reviewing peers. Results are discussed in relation to the matching of learners and instructional design of peer assessment in MOOCs.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2018
Accession Number: EJ1166071
Database: ERIC
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Be the first to leave a comment!
You must be logged in first