Speaking in Turns and Sequences: Interactional Competence as a Target Construct in Testing Speaking
Saved in:
| Title: | Speaking in Turns and Sequences: Interactional Competence as a Target Construct in Testing Speaking |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Roever, Carsten (ORCID |
| Source: | Language Testing. Jul 2018 35(3):331-355. |
| Availability: | SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: http://sagepub.com |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 25 |
| Publication Date: | 2018 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Descriptors: | Language Tests, Testing, Second Language Learning, Language Proficiency, Oral Language, Test Validity, Psycholinguistics, Communicative Competence (Languages), Interaction, Pragmatics, Evaluators, Speech Communication, Interviews |
| DOI: | 10.1177/0265532218758128 |
| ISSN: | 0265-5322 |
| Abstract: | In the assessment of speaking, a psycholinguistically based speaking construct has predominated. In this paper, we argue for the integration of the construct of interactional competence (IC) in speaking assessments to broaden the range of defensible inferences from speaking tests. IC emphasizes the co-constructed nature of interaction and enables the rating of L2 users' ability to deploy interactional tools that lead to shared understandings. Recent work on IC shows that levels of development can be distinguished, for example, in the sequential organization of social actions such as requests and refusals. This can in turn inform interactionally specific ratings. Furthermore, an IC perspective allows a fine-grained analysis of interactions between examiners and test takers to detect effects of examiner talk. Apparent misunderstandings or disfluencies by test takers can be examiner-induced with the test taker's response actually demonstrating interactional ability rather than lack of proficiency. We argue that inclusion of IC as a construct in testing speaking opens new perspectives on oral proficiency and enhances the validity of speaking assessments. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Number of References: | 96 |
| Entry Date: | 2018 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1183564 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1183564 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Speaking in Turns and Sequences: Interactional Competence as a Target Construct in Testing Speaking – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Roever%2C+Carsten%22">Roever, Carsten</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1055-6331">0000-0002-1055-6331</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Kasper%2C+Gabriele%22">Kasper, Gabriele</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Language+Testing%22"><i>Language Testing</i></searchLink>. Jul 2018 35(3):331-355. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: http://sagepub.com – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 25 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2018 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Language+Tests%22">Language Tests</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Testing%22">Testing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Second+Language+Learning%22">Second Language Learning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Language+Proficiency%22">Language Proficiency</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Oral+Language%22">Oral Language</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Test+Validity%22">Test Validity</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Psycholinguistics%22">Psycholinguistics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Communicative+Competence+%28Languages%29%22">Communicative Competence (Languages)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Interaction%22">Interaction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Pragmatics%22">Pragmatics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evaluators%22">Evaluators</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Speech+Communication%22">Speech Communication</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Interviews%22">Interviews</searchLink> – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1177/0265532218758128 – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 0265-5322 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: In the assessment of speaking, a psycholinguistically based speaking construct has predominated. In this paper, we argue for the integration of the construct of interactional competence (IC) in speaking assessments to broaden the range of defensible inferences from speaking tests. IC emphasizes the co-constructed nature of interaction and enables the rating of L2 users' ability to deploy interactional tools that lead to shared understandings. Recent work on IC shows that levels of development can be distinguished, for example, in the sequential organization of social actions such as requests and refusals. This can in turn inform interactionally specific ratings. Furthermore, an IC perspective allows a fine-grained analysis of interactions between examiners and test takers to detect effects of examiner talk. Apparent misunderstandings or disfluencies by test takers can be examiner-induced with the test taker's response actually demonstrating interactional ability rather than lack of proficiency. We argue that inclusion of IC as a construct in testing speaking opens new perspectives on oral proficiency and enhances the validity of speaking assessments. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: Ref Label: Number of References Group: RefInfo Data: 96 – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2018 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1183564 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1183564 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1177/0265532218758128 Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 25 StartPage: 331 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Language Tests Type: general – SubjectFull: Testing Type: general – SubjectFull: Second Language Learning Type: general – SubjectFull: Language Proficiency Type: general – SubjectFull: Oral Language Type: general – SubjectFull: Test Validity Type: general – SubjectFull: Psycholinguistics Type: general – SubjectFull: Communicative Competence (Languages) Type: general – SubjectFull: Interaction Type: general – SubjectFull: Pragmatics Type: general – SubjectFull: Evaluators Type: general – SubjectFull: Speech Communication Type: general – SubjectFull: Interviews Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Speaking in Turns and Sequences: Interactional Competence as a Target Construct in Testing Speaking Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Roever, Carsten – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Kasper, Gabriele IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 07 Type: published Y: 2018 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 0265-5322 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 35 – Type: issue Value: 3 Titles: – TitleFull: Language Testing Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |