A Cost-Benefit Analysis of Automatic Item Generation

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: A Cost-Benefit Analysis of Automatic Item Generation
Language: English
Authors: Kosh, Audra E. (ORCID 0000-0002-1696-0941), Simpson, Mary Ann, Bickel, Lisa, Kellogg, Mark, Sanford-Moore, Ellie
Source: Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice. Spr 2019 38(1):48-53.
Availability: Wiley-Blackwell. 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148. Tel: 800-835-6770; Tel: 781-388-8598; Fax: 781-388-8232; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: http://www.wiley.com/WileyCDA
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 6
Publication Date: 2019
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Evaluative
Education Level: Elementary Secondary Education
Descriptors: Cost Effectiveness, Automation, Test Items, Mathematics Tests, Elementary Secondary Education
DOI: 10.1111/emip.12237
ISSN: 0731-1745
Abstract: Automatic item generation (AIG)--a means of leveraging technology to create large quantities of items--requires a minimum number of items to offset the sizable upfront investment (i.e., model development and technology deployment) in order to achieve cost savings. In this cost-benefit analysis, we estimated the cost of each step of AIG and manual item writing and applied cost-benefit formulas to calculate the number of items that would have to be produced before the upfront costs of AIG outweigh manual item writing costs in the context of K-12 mathematics items. Results indicated that AIG is more cost-effective than manual item writing when developing, at a minimum, 173 to 247 items within one fine-grained content area (e.g., fourth- through seventh-grade area of figures). The article concludes with a discussion of implications for test developers and the nonmonetary tradeoffs involved in AIG.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2019
Accession Number: EJ1209262
Database: ERIC
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Be the first to leave a comment!
You must be logged in first