Instructor Strategies to Aid Implementation of Active Learning: A Systematic Literature Review
Saved in:
| Title: | Instructor Strategies to Aid Implementation of Active Learning: A Systematic Literature Review |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Nguyen, Kevin A., Borrego, Maura, Finelli, Cynthia J. (ORCID |
| Source: | International Journal of STEM Education. 2021 8. |
| Availability: | Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/ |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 18 |
| Publication Date: | 2021 |
| Sponsoring Agency: | National Science Foundation (NSF) |
| Contract Number: | 1744407 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Information Analyses |
| Education Level: | Higher Education Postsecondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Active Learning, Curriculum Implementation, Educational Research, STEM Education, Adoption (Ideas), Resistance (Psychology), Student Reaction, Problem Solving, Lecture Method, Undergraduate Students |
| DOI: | 10.1186/s40594-021-00270-7 |
| ISSN: | 2196-7822 |
| Abstract: | Background: Despite the evidence supporting the effectiveness of active learning in undergraduate STEM courses, the adoption of active learning has been slow. One barrier to adoption is instructors' concerns about students' affective and behavioral responses to active learning, especially student resistance. Numerous education researchers have documented their use of active learning in STEM classrooms. However, there is no research yet that systematically analyzes these studies for strategies to aid implementation of active learning and address students' affective and behavioral responses. In this paper, we conduct a systematic literature review and identify 29 journal articles and conference papers that researched active learning, affective and behavioral student responses, and recommended at least one strategy for implementing active learning. In this paper, we ask: (1) What are the characteristics of studies that examine affective and behavioral outcomes of active learning and provide instructor strategies?; and (2) What instructor strategies to aid implementation of active learning do the authors of these studies provide? Results: In our review, we noted that most active learning activities involved in-class problem solving within a traditional lecture-based course (N = 21). We found mostly positive affective and behavioral outcomes for students' self-reports of learning, participation in the activities, and course satisfaction (N = 23). From our analysis of the 29 studies, we identified eight strategies to aid implementation of active learning based on three categories. Explanation strategies included providing students with clarifications and reasons for using active learning. Facilitation strategies entailed working with students and ensuring that the activity functions as intended. Planning strategies involved working outside of the class to improve the active learning experience. Conclusion: To increase the adoption of active learning and address students' responses to active learning, this study provides strategies to support instructors. The eight strategies are listed with evidence from numerous studies within our review on affective and behavioral responses to active learning. Future work should examine instructor strategies and their connection with other affective outcomes, such as identity, interests, and emotions. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2021 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1291228 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1291228 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Instructor Strategies to Aid Implementation of Active Learning: A Systematic Literature Review – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Nguyen%2C+Kevin+A%2E%22">Nguyen, Kevin A.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Borrego%2C+Maura%22">Borrego, Maura</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Finelli%2C+Cynthia+J%2E%22">Finelli, Cynthia J.</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9148-1492">0000-0001-9148-1492</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22DeMonbrun%2C+Matt%22">DeMonbrun, Matt</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Crockett%2C+Caroline%22">Crockett, Caroline</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Tharayil%2C+Sneha%22">Tharayil, Sneha</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Shekhar%2C+Prateek%22">Shekhar, Prateek</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Waters%2C+Cynthia%22">Waters, Cynthia</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Rosenberg%2C+Robyn%22">Rosenberg, Robyn</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22International+Journal+of+STEM+Education%22"><i>International Journal of STEM Education</i></searchLink>. 2021 8. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/ – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 18 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2021 – Name: SourceSuprt Label: Sponsoring Agency Group: SrcSuprt Data: National Science Foundation (NSF) – Name: NumberContract Label: Contract Number Group: NumCntrct Data: 1744407 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Information Analyses – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Active+Learning%22">Active Learning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Curriculum+Implementation%22">Curriculum Implementation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Research%22">Educational Research</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22STEM+Education%22">STEM Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Adoption+%28Ideas%29%22">Adoption (Ideas)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Resistance+%28Psychology%29%22">Resistance (Psychology)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Reaction%22">Student Reaction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Problem+Solving%22">Problem Solving</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Lecture+Method%22">Lecture Method</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Undergraduate+Students%22">Undergraduate Students</searchLink> – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1186/s40594-021-00270-7 – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 2196-7822 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Background: Despite the evidence supporting the effectiveness of active learning in undergraduate STEM courses, the adoption of active learning has been slow. One barrier to adoption is instructors' concerns about students' affective and behavioral responses to active learning, especially student resistance. Numerous education researchers have documented their use of active learning in STEM classrooms. However, there is no research yet that systematically analyzes these studies for strategies to aid implementation of active learning and address students' affective and behavioral responses. In this paper, we conduct a systematic literature review and identify 29 journal articles and conference papers that researched active learning, affective and behavioral student responses, and recommended at least one strategy for implementing active learning. In this paper, we ask: (1) What are the characteristics of studies that examine affective and behavioral outcomes of active learning and provide instructor strategies?; and (2) What instructor strategies to aid implementation of active learning do the authors of these studies provide? Results: In our review, we noted that most active learning activities involved in-class problem solving within a traditional lecture-based course (N = 21). We found mostly positive affective and behavioral outcomes for students' self-reports of learning, participation in the activities, and course satisfaction (N = 23). From our analysis of the 29 studies, we identified eight strategies to aid implementation of active learning based on three categories. Explanation strategies included providing students with clarifications and reasons for using active learning. Facilitation strategies entailed working with students and ensuring that the activity functions as intended. Planning strategies involved working outside of the class to improve the active learning experience. Conclusion: To increase the adoption of active learning and address students' responses to active learning, this study provides strategies to support instructors. The eight strategies are listed with evidence from numerous studies within our review on affective and behavioral responses to active learning. Future work should examine instructor strategies and their connection with other affective outcomes, such as identity, interests, and emotions. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2021 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1291228 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1291228 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1186/s40594-021-00270-7 Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 18 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Active Learning Type: general – SubjectFull: Curriculum Implementation Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational Research Type: general – SubjectFull: STEM Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Adoption (Ideas) Type: general – SubjectFull: Resistance (Psychology) Type: general – SubjectFull: Student Reaction Type: general – SubjectFull: Problem Solving Type: general – SubjectFull: Lecture Method Type: general – SubjectFull: Undergraduate Students Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Instructor Strategies to Aid Implementation of Active Learning: A Systematic Literature Review Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Nguyen, Kevin A. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Borrego, Maura – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Finelli, Cynthia J. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: DeMonbrun, Matt – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Crockett, Caroline – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Tharayil, Sneha – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Shekhar, Prateek – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Waters, Cynthia – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Rosenberg, Robyn IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2021 Identifiers: – Type: issn-electronic Value: 2196-7822 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 8 Titles: – TitleFull: International Journal of STEM Education Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |