Effects of Course-Embedded Grammar Graders: Evidence from a Business College Writing Initiative Program
Saved in:
| Title: | Effects of Course-Embedded Grammar Graders: Evidence from a Business College Writing Initiative Program |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Clark, Lindsay C., Luo, Zijun, Smith, Ashly Bender |
| Source: | Research & Practice in Assessment. Win 2020 15(2). |
| Availability: | Virginia Assessment Group. Tel: 504-314-2898; Fax: 504-247-1232; e-mail: editor@rpajournal.com; Web site: http://www.rpajournal.com/ |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 17 |
| Publication Date: | 2020 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research Tests/Questionnaires |
| Education Level: | Higher Education Postsecondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Business Schools, Content Area Writing, Writing Instruction, Writing Evaluation, Grammar, Writing Assignments, Error Patterns, Writing Skills, Writing Improvement, Graduate Students, Grading, Evaluators |
| Geographic Terms: | Texas |
| ISSN: | 2161-4210 |
| Abstract: | Writing support programs for students in writing-intensive, disciplinary courses are well established and take many forms, including communication centers, web-based skill development programs, and embedded writing consultants. This paper assesses the effectiveness of a program that embeds a writing grader, who assesses only the grammar of students' submissions, to encourage and support business faculty in including written assignments. Our analysis of grammar errors across three writing assignments showed that students rarely included Status Marking Errors (e.g., nonstandard verb forms and double negatives) and did reduce errors from the first to last assignments. However, the cause of the error reduction and the program's long-term effectiveness in improving students' grammar skills is inconclusive. Based on our findings, we offer recommendations to program organizers for better aligning a program's stated and practical goals when providing writing support. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2021 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1293309 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1293309 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1293309 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Effects of Course-Embedded Grammar Graders: Evidence from a Business College Writing Initiative Program – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Clark%2C+Lindsay+C%2E%22">Clark, Lindsay C.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Luo%2C+Zijun%22">Luo, Zijun</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Smith%2C+Ashly+Bender%22">Smith, Ashly Bender</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Research+%26+Practice+in+Assessment%22"><i>Research & Practice in Assessment</i></searchLink>. Win 2020 15(2). – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Virginia Assessment Group. Tel: 504-314-2898; Fax: 504-247-1232; e-mail: editor@rpajournal.com; Web site: http://www.rpajournal.com/ – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 17 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2020 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research<br />Tests/Questionnaires – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Business+Schools%22">Business Schools</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Content+Area+Writing%22">Content Area Writing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Writing+Instruction%22">Writing Instruction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Writing+Evaluation%22">Writing Evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Grammar%22">Grammar</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Writing+Assignments%22">Writing Assignments</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Error+Patterns%22">Error Patterns</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Writing+Skills%22">Writing Skills</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Writing+Improvement%22">Writing Improvement</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Graduate+Students%22">Graduate Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Grading%22">Grading</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evaluators%22">Evaluators</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Texas%22">Texas</searchLink> – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 2161-4210 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Writing support programs for students in writing-intensive, disciplinary courses are well established and take many forms, including communication centers, web-based skill development programs, and embedded writing consultants. This paper assesses the effectiveness of a program that embeds a writing grader, who assesses only the grammar of students' submissions, to encourage and support business faculty in including written assignments. Our analysis of grammar errors across three writing assignments showed that students rarely included Status Marking Errors (e.g., nonstandard verb forms and double negatives) and did reduce errors from the first to last assignments. However, the cause of the error reduction and the program's long-term effectiveness in improving students' grammar skills is inconclusive. Based on our findings, we offer recommendations to program organizers for better aligning a program's stated and practical goals when providing writing support. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2021 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1293309 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1293309 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 17 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Business Schools Type: general – SubjectFull: Content Area Writing Type: general – SubjectFull: Writing Instruction Type: general – SubjectFull: Writing Evaluation Type: general – SubjectFull: Grammar Type: general – SubjectFull: Writing Assignments Type: general – SubjectFull: Error Patterns Type: general – SubjectFull: Writing Skills Type: general – SubjectFull: Writing Improvement Type: general – SubjectFull: Graduate Students Type: general – SubjectFull: Grading Type: general – SubjectFull: Evaluators Type: general – SubjectFull: Texas Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Effects of Course-Embedded Grammar Graders: Evidence from a Business College Writing Initiative Program Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Clark, Lindsay C. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Luo, Zijun – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Smith, Ashly Bender IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2020 Identifiers: – Type: issn-electronic Value: 2161-4210 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 15 – Type: issue Value: 2 Titles: – TitleFull: Research & Practice in Assessment Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |