Out of Fright, out of Mind: Impaired Memory for Information Negated during Looming Threat

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Out of Fright, out of Mind: Impaired Memory for Information Negated during Looming Threat
Language: English
Authors: Newman, Vera E. (ORCID 0000-0003-1352-8720), Yee, Hannah F., Walker, Adrian R., Toumbelekis, Metaxia, Most, Steven B.
Source: Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications. 2021 6.
Availability: Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 11
Publication Date: 2021
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Descriptors: Memory, Cognitive Processes, Difficulty Level, Anxiety, Fear, Ethics
DOI: 10.1186/s41235-021-00302-4
ISSN: 2365-7464
Abstract: People often need to update representations of information upon discovering them to be incorrect, a process that can be interrupted by competing cognitive demands. Because anxiety and stress can impair cognitive performance, we tested whether looming threat can similarly interfere with the process of updating representations of a statement's truthfulness. On each trial, participants saw a face paired with a personality descriptor. Each pairing was followed by a signal indicating whether the pairing was "true", or "false" (a negation of the truth of the statement), and this signal could be followed by a warning of imminent electric shock (i.e., the looming threat). As predicted, threat of shock left memory for "true" pairings intact, while impairing people's ability to label negated pairings as untrue. Contrary to our predictions, the pattern of errors for pairings that were negated under threat suggested that these mistakes were at least partly attributable to participants forgetting that they saw the negated information at all (rather than being driven by miscategorization of the pairings as true). Consistent with this, linear ballistic accumulator modelling suggested that this impaired recognition stemmed from weaker memory traces rather than decisional processes. We suggest that arousal due to looming threat may interfere with executive processes important for resolving competition between mutually suppressive tags of whether representations in memory are "true" or "false".
Abstractor: As Provided
Notes: https://osf.io/m34n9
Entry Date: 2021
Accession Number: EJ1294050
Database: ERIC
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
    Url: https://content.ebscohost.com/cds/retrieve?content=AQICAHj0k_4E0hTGH8RJwT4gCJyBsGNe_WN95AvKlDbXJGqwxwF4U_CXPZ_11nYeIM0US0w9AAAA4jCB3wYJKoZIhvcNAQcGoIHRMIHOAgEAMIHIBgkqhkiG9w0BBwEwHgYJYIZIAWUDBAEuMBEEDNdOeEtq7hpaL-EvsAIBEICBmrdxey8f4rTZdSh235enJ6zI-KXkk5hSdMtBpetfJhd2aLZbnEPJB19eSRFyIRRwKVni0Umt3gOazVqOyOoPfY8w3ITs2gitajs0ohBaPmrlViOJoHt4ZFiFpgdIIjRYaC6Sxjkmbq4RBkp98TTHMg5GyrvfrZCncyjfEx-jowD1kMVuQOu8JSXC3pqO9f0O8-T1wV7KwvJQGUc=
Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: EJ1294050
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Out of Fright, out of Mind: Impaired Memory for Information Negated during Looming Threat
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Newman%2C+Vera+E%2E%22">Newman, Vera E.</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1352-8720">0000-0003-1352-8720</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Yee%2C+Hannah+F%2E%22">Yee, Hannah F.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Walker%2C+Adrian+R%2E%22">Walker, Adrian R.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Toumbelekis%2C+Metaxia%22">Toumbelekis, Metaxia</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Most%2C+Steven+B%2E%22">Most, Steven B.</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Cognitive+Research%3A+Principles+and+Implications%22"><i>Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications</i></searchLink>. 2021 6.
– Name: Avail
  Label: Availability
  Group: Avail
  Data: Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Y
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 11
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2021
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Memory%22">Memory</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cognitive+Processes%22">Cognitive Processes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Difficulty+Level%22">Difficulty Level</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Anxiety%22">Anxiety</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Fear%22">Fear</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Ethics%22">Ethics</searchLink>
– Name: DOI
  Label: DOI
  Group: ID
  Data: 10.1186/s41235-021-00302-4
– Name: ISSN
  Label: ISSN
  Group: ISSN
  Data: 2365-7464
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: People often need to update representations of information upon discovering them to be incorrect, a process that can be interrupted by competing cognitive demands. Because anxiety and stress can impair cognitive performance, we tested whether looming threat can similarly interfere with the process of updating representations of a statement's truthfulness. On each trial, participants saw a face paired with a personality descriptor. Each pairing was followed by a signal indicating whether the pairing was "true", or "false" (a negation of the truth of the statement), and this signal could be followed by a warning of imminent electric shock (i.e., the looming threat). As predicted, threat of shock left memory for "true" pairings intact, while impairing people's ability to label negated pairings as untrue. Contrary to our predictions, the pattern of errors for pairings that were negated under threat suggested that these mistakes were at least partly attributable to participants forgetting that they saw the negated information at all (rather than being driven by miscategorization of the pairings as true). Consistent with this, linear ballistic accumulator modelling suggested that this impaired recognition stemmed from weaker memory traces rather than decisional processes. We suggest that arousal due to looming threat may interfere with executive processes important for resolving competition between mutually suppressive tags of whether representations in memory are "true" or "false".
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: As Provided
– Name: Note
  Label: Notes
  Group: Note
  Data: https://osf.io/m34n9
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2021
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: EJ1294050
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1294050
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1186/s41235-021-00302-4
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 11
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Memory
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Cognitive Processes
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Difficulty Level
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Anxiety
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Fear
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Ethics
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Out of Fright, out of Mind: Impaired Memory for Information Negated during Looming Threat
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Newman, Vera E.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Yee, Hannah F.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Walker, Adrian R.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Toumbelekis, Metaxia
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Most, Steven B.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 01
              Type: published
              Y: 2021
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-electronic
              Value: 2365-7464
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 6
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
              Type: main
ResultId 1