High-Impact Teaching Practices in Higher Education: A Best Evidence Review
Saved in:
| Title: | High-Impact Teaching Practices in Higher Education: A Best Evidence Review |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Smith, Calvin D. (ORCID |
| Source: | Studies in Higher Education. 2021 46(8):1696-1713. |
| Availability: | Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 18 |
| Publication Date: | 2021 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Information Analyses Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Higher Education Postsecondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Educational Quality, Teaching Methods, Higher Education, Validity, Instructional Innovation, Evidence Based Practice, Foreign Countries, Best Practices, Research Reports |
| Geographic Terms: | Australia |
| DOI: | 10.1080/03075079.2019.1698539 |
| ISSN: | 0307-5079 |
| Abstract: | In this paper, we report on an attempt to systematically discover reliable and high-quality evidence on teaching practices that have an impact on student learning. We adopted an innovative approach that was modelled on some of the practices of a systematic review. Papers that met certain quality criteria (population generalisability, ecological validity, measurement validity, logical clarity and design justification) were examined and a weighted-average score for each paper was calculated. These were then ranked to derive lists of best-evidenced and most impactful teaching and curriculum strategies. The results reveal that this method provides a reasonable approach to distilling the available literature into a concise representation of the most effective practices that are backed by good research design attributes. The results will be useful for curriculum designers, university leaders and policy makers, and have already informed policy at one Australian university. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2021 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1305133 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Url: https://content.ebscohost.com/cds/retrieve?content=AQICAHj0k_4E0hTGH8RJwT4gCJyBsGNe_WN95AvKlDbXJGqwxwEu7n6Cuy9cOO6tJV5j4ha5AAAA4zCB4AYJKoZIhvcNAQcGoIHSMIHPAgEAMIHJBgkqhkiG9w0BBwEwHgYJYIZIAWUDBAEuMBEEDMFIDsJae7m7AzBE0gIBEICBmzNg72D4fVtJBFUnprp0g8o5bvDX_nz02GFMDnvjOVgtAgIxGgDq4bgZN6xiCSrIfK3CRKbPLESIItXAt31CTW-5kepH6h4a4dj4NlnUVUdK9DW579OpO-yRYGfFGXSJ1ppOn820-qBHNVEE2byAsc_qVE5ioSxwCAHHBVySqXpihbCQA0Da1LcBqHll6WyOTDIb6bQyYaZIH1WX Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1305133 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: High-Impact Teaching Practices in Higher Education: A Best Evidence Review – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Smith%2C+Calvin+D%2E%22">Smith, Calvin D.</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3544-8337">0000-0002-3544-8337</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Baik%2C+Chi%22">Baik, Chi</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0480-5522">0000-0002-0480-5522</externalLink>) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Studies+in+Higher+Education%22"><i>Studies in Higher Education</i></searchLink>. 2021 46(8):1696-1713. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 18 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2021 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Information Analyses<br />Reports - Research – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Quality%22">Educational Quality</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teaching+Methods%22">Teaching Methods</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Validity%22">Validity</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Instructional+Innovation%22">Instructional Innovation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evidence+Based+Practice%22">Evidence Based Practice</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Foreign+Countries%22">Foreign Countries</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Best+Practices%22">Best Practices</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+Reports%22">Research Reports</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Australia%22">Australia</searchLink> – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1080/03075079.2019.1698539 – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 0307-5079 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: In this paper, we report on an attempt to systematically discover reliable and high-quality evidence on teaching practices that have an impact on student learning. We adopted an innovative approach that was modelled on some of the practices of a systematic review. Papers that met certain quality criteria (population generalisability, ecological validity, measurement validity, logical clarity and design justification) were examined and a weighted-average score for each paper was calculated. These were then ranked to derive lists of best-evidenced and most impactful teaching and curriculum strategies. The results reveal that this method provides a reasonable approach to distilling the available literature into a concise representation of the most effective practices that are backed by good research design attributes. The results will be useful for curriculum designers, university leaders and policy makers, and have already informed policy at one Australian university. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2021 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1305133 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1305133 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1080/03075079.2019.1698539 Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 18 StartPage: 1696 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Educational Quality Type: general – SubjectFull: Teaching Methods Type: general – SubjectFull: Higher Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Validity Type: general – SubjectFull: Instructional Innovation Type: general – SubjectFull: Evidence Based Practice Type: general – SubjectFull: Foreign Countries Type: general – SubjectFull: Best Practices Type: general – SubjectFull: Research Reports Type: general – SubjectFull: Australia Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: High-Impact Teaching Practices in Higher Education: A Best Evidence Review Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Smith, Calvin D. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Baik, Chi IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2021 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 0307-5079 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 46 – Type: issue Value: 8 Titles: – TitleFull: Studies in Higher Education Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |