A Meta-Analytic Review of the Benefit of Spacing out Retrieval Practice Episodes on Retention
Saved in:
| Title: | A Meta-Analytic Review of the Benefit of Spacing out Retrieval Practice Episodes on Retention |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Latimier, Alice (ORCID |
| Source: | Educational Psychology Review. Sep 2021 33(3):959-987. |
| Availability: | Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/ |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 29 |
| Publication Date: | 2021 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Descriptors: | Meta Analysis, Recall (Psychology), Retention (Psychology), Statistical Analysis, Proximity |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s10648-020-09572-8 |
| ISSN: | 1040-726X |
| Abstract: | Spaced retrieval practice consists of repetitions of the same retrieval event distributed through time. This learning strategy combines two "desirable difficulties": retrieval practice and spacing effects. We carried out meta-analyses on 29 studies investigating the benefit of spacing out retrieval practice episodes on final retention. The total dataset was divided into two subsets to investigate two main questions: (1) Does spaced retrieval practice induce better memory retention than massed retrieval practice? (subset 1); and (2) Is the expanding spacing schedule superior to the uniform spacing schedule when learning with retrieval practice? (subset 2). Using meta-regression with robust variance estimation, 39 effect sizes were aggregated in subset 1 and 54 in subset 2. Results from subset 1 indicated a strong benefit of spaced retrieval practice in comparison with massed retrieval practice (g = 0.74). Results from subset 2 indicated no significant difference between expanding and uniform spacing schedules of retrieval practice (g = 0.034). Moderator analyses on this subset showed that the number of exposures of an item during retrieval practice explains inconsistencies between studies: the more learners are tested, the more beneficial the expanding schedule is compared with the uniform one. Overall, these results support the advantage of spacing out the retrieval practice episodes on the same content, but do not support the widely held belief that inter-retrieval intervals should be progressively increased until a retention test. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Notes: | https://osf.io/jbmq4/?view_only=c05f2fcb93bc4d77b68fb11b1561d220 |
| Entry Date: | 2021 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1310148 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Url: https://content.ebscohost.com/cds/retrieve?content=AQICAHj0k_4E0hTGH8RJwT4gCJyBsGNe_WN95AvKlDbXJGqwxwEs22bA49XMFv-yOWg5c50kAAAA4zCB4AYJKoZIhvcNAQcGoIHSMIHPAgEAMIHJBgkqhkiG9w0BBwEwHgYJYIZIAWUDBAEuMBEEDOhebO_lbKJGvbG-bAIBEICBm_trI37LzwAaN_Y57IIhY6P6XYuIiNXzGtHgCGk6wM5UjGfmlAYp667sGozTUG-gGIDJJTls9KR1Wb9VvjNf7u-t6825yAI1kSpQAboAOt3vDjPbylfyXZHGgBfOCk7DhMM80wYFsdpuhm2xJ2LDfaeVM3SdJ8VCboidA8guWEoDYO-GEqZTNUibR_RJ1ic0RE7YXTSARe5vUW_3 Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1310148 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Benefit of Spacing out Retrieval Practice Episodes on Retention – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Latimier%2C+Alice%22">Latimier, Alice</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3914-7208">0000-0002-3914-7208</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Peyre%2C+Hugo%22">Peyre, Hugo</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ramus%2C+Franck%22">Ramus, Franck</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Educational+Psychology+Review%22"><i>Educational Psychology Review</i></searchLink>. Sep 2021 33(3):959-987. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/ – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 29 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2021 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Meta+Analysis%22">Meta Analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Recall+%28Psychology%29%22">Recall (Psychology)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Retention+%28Psychology%29%22">Retention (Psychology)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Statistical+Analysis%22">Statistical Analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Proximity%22">Proximity</searchLink> – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1007/s10648-020-09572-8 – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 1040-726X – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Spaced retrieval practice consists of repetitions of the same retrieval event distributed through time. This learning strategy combines two "desirable difficulties": retrieval practice and spacing effects. We carried out meta-analyses on 29 studies investigating the benefit of spacing out retrieval practice episodes on final retention. The total dataset was divided into two subsets to investigate two main questions: (1) Does spaced retrieval practice induce better memory retention than massed retrieval practice? (subset 1); and (2) Is the expanding spacing schedule superior to the uniform spacing schedule when learning with retrieval practice? (subset 2). Using meta-regression with robust variance estimation, 39 effect sizes were aggregated in subset 1 and 54 in subset 2. Results from subset 1 indicated a strong benefit of spaced retrieval practice in comparison with massed retrieval practice (g = 0.74). Results from subset 2 indicated no significant difference between expanding and uniform spacing schedules of retrieval practice (g = 0.034). Moderator analyses on this subset showed that the number of exposures of an item during retrieval practice explains inconsistencies between studies: the more learners are tested, the more beneficial the expanding schedule is compared with the uniform one. Overall, these results support the advantage of spacing out the retrieval practice episodes on the same content, but do not support the widely held belief that inter-retrieval intervals should be progressively increased until a retention test. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: Note Label: Notes Group: Note Data: https://osf.io/jbmq4/?view_only=c05f2fcb93bc4d77b68fb11b1561d220 – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2021 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1310148 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1310148 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1007/s10648-020-09572-8 Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 29 StartPage: 959 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Meta Analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Recall (Psychology) Type: general – SubjectFull: Retention (Psychology) Type: general – SubjectFull: Statistical Analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Proximity Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Benefit of Spacing out Retrieval Practice Episodes on Retention Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Latimier, Alice – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Peyre, Hugo – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Ramus, Franck IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 09 Type: published Y: 2021 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 1040-726X Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 33 – Type: issue Value: 3 Titles: – TitleFull: Educational Psychology Review Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |