Linking the Dynamics of Cognitive Control to Individual Differences in Working Memory Capacity: Evidence from Reaching Behavior
Saved in:
| Title: | Linking the Dynamics of Cognitive Control to Individual Differences in Working Memory Capacity: Evidence from Reaching Behavior |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Erb, Christopher D. (ORCID |
| Source: | Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. Sep 2021 47(9):1383-1402. |
| Availability: | American Psychological Association. Journals Department, 750 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20002. Tel: 800-374-2721; Tel: 202-336-5510; Fax: 202-336-5502; e-mail: order@apa.org; Web site: http://www.apa.org |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 20 |
| Publication Date: | 2021 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Higher Education Postsecondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Individual Differences, Undergraduate Students, Cognitive Processes, Task Analysis, Reaction Time, Motor Reactions, Short Term Memory, Correlation, Scores, Biochemistry, Executive Function, Inhibition |
| DOI: | 10.1037/xlm0001018 |
| ISSN: | 0278-7393 |
| Abstract: | We used a technique known as reach tracking to investigate how individual differences in working memory capacity (WMC) relate to the functioning of two processes proposed to underlie cognitive control: a threshold adjustment process that temporarily inhibits motor output in response to signals of conflict and a controlled selection process that recruits top-down control to guide stimulus-response translation. Undergraduates (N = 135) performed two WMC tasks (updating counters and symmetry span) and a reach-tracking version of the Eriksen flanker task. Consistent with previous research using button-press flanker tasks, WMC significantly correlated with response time (RT) performance, with higher WMC scores corresponding to smaller congruency effects. Given that RTs reflect the combined functioning of multiple processes underlying cognitive control, we interpreted this effect to reflect a general link between WMC and both the threshold adjustment process and controlled selection process. We also found a significant association between WMC and participants' reach trajectories, with higher WMC scores corresponding to more direct reach movements on incongruent trials involving stimulus-response overlap with the preceding trial. We interpreted this effect to reflect a more specific link between WMC and the functioning of the controlled selection process. We discuss the observed links between WMC and cognitive control in relation to the unity and diversity of executive functions framework and in relation to the role of prefrontal and striatal dopamine in supporting adaptive cognitive control. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Notes: | https://osf.io/6hz3a |
| Entry Date: | 2021 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1318792 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1318792 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Linking the Dynamics of Cognitive Control to Individual Differences in Working Memory Capacity: Evidence from Reaching Behavior – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Erb%2C+Christopher+D%2E%22">Erb, Christopher D.</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1649-2324">0000-0002-1649-2324</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Welhaf%2C+Matthew+S%2E%22">Welhaf, Matthew S.</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2826-5268">0000-0002-2826-5268</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Smeekens%2C+Bridget+A%2E%22">Smeekens, Bridget A.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Moreau%2C+David%22">Moreau, David</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1957-1941">0000-0002-1957-1941</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Kane%2C+Michael+J%2E%22">Kane, Michael J.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Marcovitch%2C+Stuart%22">Marcovitch, Stuart</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Journal+of+Experimental+Psychology%3A+Learning%2C+Memory%2C+and+Cognition%22"><i>Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition</i></searchLink>. Sep 2021 47(9):1383-1402. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: American Psychological Association. Journals Department, 750 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20002. Tel: 800-374-2721; Tel: 202-336-5510; Fax: 202-336-5502; e-mail: order@apa.org; Web site: http://www.apa.org – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 20 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2021 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Individual+Differences%22">Individual Differences</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Undergraduate+Students%22">Undergraduate Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cognitive+Processes%22">Cognitive Processes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Task+Analysis%22">Task Analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Reaction+Time%22">Reaction Time</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Motor+Reactions%22">Motor Reactions</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Short+Term+Memory%22">Short Term Memory</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Correlation%22">Correlation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Scores%22">Scores</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Biochemistry%22">Biochemistry</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Executive+Function%22">Executive Function</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Inhibition%22">Inhibition</searchLink> – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1037/xlm0001018 – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 0278-7393 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: We used a technique known as reach tracking to investigate how individual differences in working memory capacity (WMC) relate to the functioning of two processes proposed to underlie cognitive control: a threshold adjustment process that temporarily inhibits motor output in response to signals of conflict and a controlled selection process that recruits top-down control to guide stimulus-response translation. Undergraduates (N = 135) performed two WMC tasks (updating counters and symmetry span) and a reach-tracking version of the Eriksen flanker task. Consistent with previous research using button-press flanker tasks, WMC significantly correlated with response time (RT) performance, with higher WMC scores corresponding to smaller congruency effects. Given that RTs reflect the combined functioning of multiple processes underlying cognitive control, we interpreted this effect to reflect a general link between WMC and both the threshold adjustment process and controlled selection process. We also found a significant association between WMC and participants' reach trajectories, with higher WMC scores corresponding to more direct reach movements on incongruent trials involving stimulus-response overlap with the preceding trial. We interpreted this effect to reflect a more specific link between WMC and the functioning of the controlled selection process. We discuss the observed links between WMC and cognitive control in relation to the unity and diversity of executive functions framework and in relation to the role of prefrontal and striatal dopamine in supporting adaptive cognitive control. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: Note Label: Notes Group: Note Data: https://osf.io/6hz3a – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2021 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1318792 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1318792 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1037/xlm0001018 Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 20 StartPage: 1383 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Individual Differences Type: general – SubjectFull: Undergraduate Students Type: general – SubjectFull: Cognitive Processes Type: general – SubjectFull: Task Analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Reaction Time Type: general – SubjectFull: Motor Reactions Type: general – SubjectFull: Short Term Memory Type: general – SubjectFull: Correlation Type: general – SubjectFull: Scores Type: general – SubjectFull: Biochemistry Type: general – SubjectFull: Executive Function Type: general – SubjectFull: Inhibition Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Linking the Dynamics of Cognitive Control to Individual Differences in Working Memory Capacity: Evidence from Reaching Behavior Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Erb, Christopher D. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Welhaf, Matthew S. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Smeekens, Bridget A. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Moreau, David – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Kane, Michael J. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Marcovitch, Stuart IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 09 Type: published Y: 2021 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 0278-7393 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 47 – Type: issue Value: 9 Titles: – TitleFull: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |