Using the Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) Building Block Approach to Implement System Evaluation Theory (SET)
Saved in:
| Title: | Using the Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) Building Block Approach to Implement System Evaluation Theory (SET) |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Renger, Ralph (ORCID |
| Source: | American Journal of Evaluation. Dec 2021 42(4):586-601. |
| Availability: | SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: http://sagepub.com |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 16 |
| Publication Date: | 2021 |
| Sponsoring Agency: | National Institutes of Health (DHHS) |
| Contract Number: | U54GM128729 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Evaluative |
| Descriptors: | Systems Approach, Evaluation, Theories, Cancer, Medical Research, Organizational Change, Organizational Culture |
| DOI: | 10.1177/1098214020986619 |
| ISSN: | 1098-2140 |
| Abstract: | This article shares lessons learned in applying system evaluation theory (SET) to evaluate a Clinical and Translational Research Center (CTR) funded by the National Institutes of Health. After describing how CTR support cores are intended to work interdependently as a system, the case is made for SET as the best fit for evaluating this evaluand. The article then details how the evaluation was also challenged to facilitate a CTR culture shift, helping support cores to move from working autonomously to working together and understanding how the cores' individual operating processes impact each other. This was achieved by incorporating the Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) building block approach to implement SET. Each of the seven HSEEP building blocks is examined for alignment with each of SET's three steps and the ability to systematically support the goal of moving CTR cores toward working interdependently. The implications of using HSEEP to support SET implementation for future evaluations are discussed. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2022 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1320593 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1320593 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Using the Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) Building Block Approach to Implement System Evaluation Theory (SET) – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Renger%2C+Ralph%22">Renger, Ralph</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0224-1444">0000-0002-0224-1444</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Renger%2C+Jessica%22">Renger, Jessica</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Basson%2C+Marc+D%2E%22">Basson, Marc D.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Van+Eck%2C+Richard+N%2E%22">Van Eck, Richard N.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Renger%2C+Jirina%22">Renger, Jirina</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Souvannasacd%2C+Eric%22">Souvannasacd, Eric</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Hart%2C+Gary%22">Hart, Gary</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22American+Journal+of+Evaluation%22"><i>American Journal of Evaluation</i></searchLink>. Dec 2021 42(4):586-601. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: http://sagepub.com – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 16 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2021 – Name: SourceSuprt Label: Sponsoring Agency Group: SrcSuprt Data: National Institutes of Health (DHHS) – Name: NumberContract Label: Contract Number Group: NumCntrct Data: U54GM128729 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Evaluative – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Systems+Approach%22">Systems Approach</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evaluation%22">Evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Theories%22">Theories</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cancer%22">Cancer</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medical+Research%22">Medical Research</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Organizational+Change%22">Organizational Change</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Organizational+Culture%22">Organizational Culture</searchLink> – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1177/1098214020986619 – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 1098-2140 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: This article shares lessons learned in applying system evaluation theory (SET) to evaluate a Clinical and Translational Research Center (CTR) funded by the National Institutes of Health. After describing how CTR support cores are intended to work interdependently as a system, the case is made for SET as the best fit for evaluating this evaluand. The article then details how the evaluation was also challenged to facilitate a CTR culture shift, helping support cores to move from working autonomously to working together and understanding how the cores' individual operating processes impact each other. This was achieved by incorporating the Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) building block approach to implement SET. Each of the seven HSEEP building blocks is examined for alignment with each of SET's three steps and the ability to systematically support the goal of moving CTR cores toward working interdependently. The implications of using HSEEP to support SET implementation for future evaluations are discussed. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2022 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1320593 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1320593 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1177/1098214020986619 Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 16 StartPage: 586 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Systems Approach Type: general – SubjectFull: Evaluation Type: general – SubjectFull: Theories Type: general – SubjectFull: Cancer Type: general – SubjectFull: Medical Research Type: general – SubjectFull: Organizational Change Type: general – SubjectFull: Organizational Culture Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Using the Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) Building Block Approach to Implement System Evaluation Theory (SET) Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Renger, Ralph – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Renger, Jessica – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Basson, Marc D. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Van Eck, Richard N. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Renger, Jirina – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Souvannasacd, Eric – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Hart, Gary IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 12 Type: published Y: 2021 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 1098-2140 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 42 – Type: issue Value: 4 Titles: – TitleFull: American Journal of Evaluation Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |