Bridge of Promise: Comparing the Academic Outcomes of Kalamazoo Promise to Public School Students in a 4-Year Institution

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Bridge of Promise: Comparing the Academic Outcomes of Kalamazoo Promise to Public School Students in a 4-Year Institution
Language: English
Authors: Collier, Daniel A. (ORCID 0000-0002-3164-0815), Fitzpatrick, Dan, Houston, Derek A., Archer, Eric
Source: Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice. Nov 2022 24(3):676-702.
Availability: SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: https://sagepub.com
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 27
Publication Date: 2022
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: High Schools
Secondary Education
Higher Education
Postsecondary Education
Descriptors: Outcomes of Education, Public Schools, Student Diversity, Socioeconomic Status, Grade Point Average, Educational Attainment, High School Graduates, College Enrollment, Academic Failure, Academic Probation
Geographic Terms: Michigan
DOI: 10.1177/1521025120942892
ISSN: 1521-0251
1541-4167
Abstract: This study compares Kalamazoo Promise (KPromise) students to non-Promise, public high school graduating students at a 4-year institution. The final sample for this study was N=9,969; n = 310 (3%) were KPromise students. Descriptive analysis suggests that KPromise students were racially more diverse and less affluent than non-Promise students. Unweighted regressions show that being a KPromise student was correlated with lower college GPA, increased chance of Academic Dismissal, and lowered likelihood of Degree Attainment. Weighting the sample using Inverse Probability Weighing with Regression Adjustment (IPWRA), being a KPromise student was not correlated to any examined outcomes. However, we were unable to generate a suitably similar comparison sample with the variables we could access. Overall, the Kalamazoo Promise allows students to access the university who are so different from the comparison population that it interferes with standard approaches to assessing outcomes. Discussion centers on descriptive differences and highlights the need for better student-level data.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2022
Accession Number: EJ1350607
Database: ERIC
Be the first to leave a comment!
You must be logged in first