Individual and Institutional Productivity in Educational Psychology Journals from 2015 to 2021

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Individual and Institutional Productivity in Educational Psychology Journals from 2015 to 2021
Language: English
Authors: Fong, Carlton J. (ORCID 0000-0003-4620-989X), Flanigan, Abraham E., Hogan, Eric, Brady, Anna C., Griffin, Marlynn M., Gonzales, Cassandra, García, Agustín J., Fathi, Zohreh, Robinson, Daniel H.
Source: Educational Psychology Review. Dec 2022 34(4):2379-2403.
Availability: Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 25
Publication Date: 2022
Document Type: Journal Articles
Information Analyses
Education Level: Higher Education
Postsecondary Education
Descriptors: Productivity, Educational Psychology, Periodicals, Futures (of Society), Trend Analysis, Faculty Publishing, Authors, Universities, Researchers, College Faculty, Journal Articles, Cooperation
DOI: 10.1007/s10648-022-09704-2
ISSN: 1040-726X
1573-336X
Abstract: This study updates and extends prior work on institutional and individual productivity in educational psychology journals ("Cognition and Instruction," "Contemporary Educational Psychology," "Educational Psychologist," "Educational Psychology Review," "Journal of Educational Psychology") from 2015 to 2021. As in previous studies, the University of Maryland, College Park, was the top-producing institution. Several universities (e.g., University of Tübingen) emerged as highly productive compared to previous time periods. Using two approaches to measure individual productivity, we found that Richard Mayer, Ulrich Trautwein, Fred Paas, Patricia Alexander, and Logan Fiorella claimed the top spots. We also identified productive early career scholars and, for some, recognized connections to productive doctoral advisors. Overall, compared to prior years, authors of educational psychology journal articles were increasingly working from non-US institutions and in larger teams (higher mean number of authors per article). A discussion of these trends and future directions for research are included.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2022
Accession Number: EJ1360162
Database: ERIC
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Be the first to leave a comment!
You must be logged in first