The Effects of Assessment Design on Academic Dishonesty, Learner Engagement, and Certification Rates in MOOCs
Saved in:
| Title: | The Effects of Assessment Design on Academic Dishonesty, Learner Engagement, and Certification Rates in MOOCs |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Alexandron, Giora (ORCID |
| Source: | Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. Feb 2023 39(1):141-153. |
| Availability: | Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www.wiley.com/en-us |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 13 |
| Publication Date: | 2023 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Descriptors: | MOOCs, Evaluation, Models, Learner Engagement, Certification, Incidence, Cheating, Competence, Time Management, Test Construction, Graduation Rate, Minimum Competency Testing |
| DOI: | 10.1111/jcal.12733 |
| ISSN: | 0266-4909 1365-2729 |
| Abstract: | Background: Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) have touted the idea of democratizing education, but soon enough, this utopian idea collided with the reality of finding sustainable business models. In addition, the promise of harnessing interactive and social web technologies to promote meaningful learning was only partially successful. And finally, studies demonstrated that many learners exploit the anonymity and feedback to earn certificates unethically. Thus, establishing MOOC pedagogical models that balance open access, meaningful learning, and trustworthy assessment remains a challenge that is crucial for the field to achieve its goals. Objectives: This study analysed the influence of an MOOC assessment model, denoted the Competency Exam (CE), on learner engagement, the level of cheating, and certification rates. At its core, this model separates learning from for-credit assessment, and it was introduced by the MITx Biology course team in 2016. Methods: We applied a learning analytics methodology to the clickstream data of the verified learners (N = 559) from four consecutive runs of an Introductory Biology MOOC offered through edX. The analysis used novel algorithms for measuring the level of cheating and learner engagement, which were developed in the previous studies. Results and Conclusions: On the positive side, the CE model reduced cheating and did not reduce learner engagement with the main learning materials -- videos and formative assessment items. On the negative side, it led to procrastination, and certification rates were lower. Implications: First, the results shed light on the fundamental connection between incentive design and learner behaviour. Second, the CE provides MOOC designers with an 'analytically verified' model to reduce cheating without compromising on open access. Third, our methodology provides a novel means for measuring cheating and learner engagement in MOOCs. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2023 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1362072 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1362072 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: The Effects of Assessment Design on Academic Dishonesty, Learner Engagement, and Certification Rates in MOOCs – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Alexandron%2C+Giora%22">Alexandron, Giora</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2676-6912">0000-0003-2676-6912</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Wiltrout%2C+Mary+Ellen%22">Wiltrout, Mary Ellen</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Berg%2C+Aviram%22">Berg, Aviram</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Gershon%2C+Sa'ar+Karp%22">Gershon, Sa'ar Karp</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ruipérez-Valiente%2C+José+A%2E%22">Ruipérez-Valiente, José A.</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Journal+of+Computer+Assisted+Learning%22"><i>Journal of Computer Assisted Learning</i></searchLink>. Feb 2023 39(1):141-153. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www.wiley.com/en-us – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 13 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2023 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22MOOCs%22">MOOCs</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evaluation%22">Evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Models%22">Models</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Learner+Engagement%22">Learner Engagement</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Certification%22">Certification</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Incidence%22">Incidence</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cheating%22">Cheating</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Competence%22">Competence</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Time+Management%22">Time Management</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Test+Construction%22">Test Construction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Graduation+Rate%22">Graduation Rate</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Minimum+Competency+Testing%22">Minimum Competency Testing</searchLink> – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1111/jcal.12733 – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 0266-4909<br />1365-2729 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Background: Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) have touted the idea of democratizing education, but soon enough, this utopian idea collided with the reality of finding sustainable business models. In addition, the promise of harnessing interactive and social web technologies to promote meaningful learning was only partially successful. And finally, studies demonstrated that many learners exploit the anonymity and feedback to earn certificates unethically. Thus, establishing MOOC pedagogical models that balance open access, meaningful learning, and trustworthy assessment remains a challenge that is crucial for the field to achieve its goals. Objectives: This study analysed the influence of an MOOC assessment model, denoted the Competency Exam (CE), on learner engagement, the level of cheating, and certification rates. At its core, this model separates learning from for-credit assessment, and it was introduced by the MITx Biology course team in 2016. Methods: We applied a learning analytics methodology to the clickstream data of the verified learners (N = 559) from four consecutive runs of an Introductory Biology MOOC offered through edX. The analysis used novel algorithms for measuring the level of cheating and learner engagement, which were developed in the previous studies. Results and Conclusions: On the positive side, the CE model reduced cheating and did not reduce learner engagement with the main learning materials -- videos and formative assessment items. On the negative side, it led to procrastination, and certification rates were lower. Implications: First, the results shed light on the fundamental connection between incentive design and learner behaviour. Second, the CE provides MOOC designers with an 'analytically verified' model to reduce cheating without compromising on open access. Third, our methodology provides a novel means for measuring cheating and learner engagement in MOOCs. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2023 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1362072 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1362072 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1111/jcal.12733 Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 13 StartPage: 141 Subjects: – SubjectFull: MOOCs Type: general – SubjectFull: Evaluation Type: general – SubjectFull: Models Type: general – SubjectFull: Learner Engagement Type: general – SubjectFull: Certification Type: general – SubjectFull: Incidence Type: general – SubjectFull: Cheating Type: general – SubjectFull: Competence Type: general – SubjectFull: Time Management Type: general – SubjectFull: Test Construction Type: general – SubjectFull: Graduation Rate Type: general – SubjectFull: Minimum Competency Testing Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: The Effects of Assessment Design on Academic Dishonesty, Learner Engagement, and Certification Rates in MOOCs Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Alexandron, Giora – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Wiltrout, Mary Ellen – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Berg, Aviram – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Gershon, Sa'ar Karp – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Ruipérez-Valiente, José A. IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 02 Type: published Y: 2023 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 0266-4909 – Type: issn-electronic Value: 1365-2729 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 39 – Type: issue Value: 1 Titles: – TitleFull: Journal of Computer Assisted Learning Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |