To Ask Better Questions, Teach: Learning-by-Teaching Enhances Research Question Generation More than Retrieval Practice and Concept-Mapping

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: To Ask Better Questions, Teach: Learning-by-Teaching Enhances Research Question Generation More than Retrieval Practice and Concept-Mapping
Language: English
Authors: Wong, Sarah Shi Hui (ORCID 0000-0003-4243-212X), Lim, Kagen Y. L. (ORCID 0000-0003-4868-1127), Lim, Stephen Wee Hun (ORCID 0000-0003-3636-7587)
Source: Journal of Educational Psychology. Aug 2023 115(6):798-812.
Availability: American Psychological Association. Journals Department, 750 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20002. Tel: 800-374-2721; Tel: 202-336-5510; Fax: 202-336-5502; e-mail: order@apa.org; Web site: http://www.apa.org
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 15
Publication Date: 2023
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: Higher Education
Postsecondary Education
Descriptors: Peer Teaching, Research Skills, Teaching Methods, Concept Mapping, Science Education, Instructional Effectiveness, Thinking Skills, Recall (Psychology), Retention (Psychology), Undergraduate Students, Foreign Countries, Science Process Skills
Geographic Terms: Singapore
DOI: 10.1037/edu0000802
ISSN: 0022-0663
1939-2176
Abstract: Asking good questions is vital for scientific learning and discovery, but improving this complex skill is a formidable challenge. Here, we show in two experiments (N = 152) that teaching others--"learning-by-teaching"--enhances one's ability to generate higher-order research questions that create new knowledge, relative to two other well-established generative learning techniques: retrieval practice and concept-mapping. Learners who taught scientific expository texts across natural and social sciences topics by delivering video-recorded lectures outperformed their peers who practiced retrieval or constructed concept maps when tested on their ability to generate "create"-level research questions based on the texts (Experiment 1). This advantage held reliably even on a delayed test 48 hr later, and when all learners similarly received and responded to post-study questions on the material (Experiment 2). Moreover, across both immediate and delayed tests, learning-by-teaching produced a recall benefit that rivaled that of the potent technique of retrieval practice. In contrast, despite recalling more than twice the study content that the concept-mapping group did, learners who practiced retrieval were unable to generate more "create"-level research questions based on that content. Three supplemental experiments (N = 168) further showed that retrieval practice consistently did not improve higher-order question generation over restudying, despite yielding superior long-term retention. Altogether, these findings reveal that simply possessing a wealth of factual knowledge is insufficient for generating higher-order research questions that create new knowledge. Rather, teaching others is a powerful strategy for producing deep and durable learning that enables research question generation. To ask better questions, teach.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2023
Accession Number: EJ1386318
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: EJ1386318
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: To Ask Better Questions, Teach: Learning-by-Teaching Enhances Research Question Generation More than Retrieval Practice and Concept-Mapping
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Wong%2C+Sarah+Shi+Hui%22">Wong, Sarah Shi Hui</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4243-212X">0000-0003-4243-212X</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Lim%2C+Kagen+Y%2E+L%2E%22">Lim, Kagen Y. L.</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4868-1127">0000-0003-4868-1127</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Lim%2C+Stephen+Wee+Hun%22">Lim, Stephen Wee Hun</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3636-7587">0000-0003-3636-7587</externalLink>)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Journal+of+Educational+Psychology%22"><i>Journal of Educational Psychology</i></searchLink>. Aug 2023 115(6):798-812.
– Name: Avail
  Label: Availability
  Group: Avail
  Data: American Psychological Association. Journals Department, 750 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20002. Tel: 800-374-2721; Tel: 202-336-5510; Fax: 202-336-5502; e-mail: order@apa.org; Web site: http://www.apa.org
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Y
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 15
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2023
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research
– Name: Audience
  Label: Education Level
  Group: Audnce
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Peer+Teaching%22">Peer Teaching</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+Skills%22">Research Skills</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teaching+Methods%22">Teaching Methods</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Concept+Mapping%22">Concept Mapping</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Science+Education%22">Science Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Instructional+Effectiveness%22">Instructional Effectiveness</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Thinking+Skills%22">Thinking Skills</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Recall+%28Psychology%29%22">Recall (Psychology)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Retention+%28Psychology%29%22">Retention (Psychology)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Undergraduate+Students%22">Undergraduate Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Foreign+Countries%22">Foreign Countries</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Science+Process+Skills%22">Science Process Skills</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Singapore%22">Singapore</searchLink>
– Name: DOI
  Label: DOI
  Group: ID
  Data: 10.1037/edu0000802
– Name: ISSN
  Label: ISSN
  Group: ISSN
  Data: 0022-0663<br />1939-2176
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Asking good questions is vital for scientific learning and discovery, but improving this complex skill is a formidable challenge. Here, we show in two experiments (N = 152) that teaching others--"learning-by-teaching"--enhances one's ability to generate higher-order research questions that create new knowledge, relative to two other well-established generative learning techniques: retrieval practice and concept-mapping. Learners who taught scientific expository texts across natural and social sciences topics by delivering video-recorded lectures outperformed their peers who practiced retrieval or constructed concept maps when tested on their ability to generate "create"-level research questions based on the texts (Experiment 1). This advantage held reliably even on a delayed test 48 hr later, and when all learners similarly received and responded to post-study questions on the material (Experiment 2). Moreover, across both immediate and delayed tests, learning-by-teaching produced a recall benefit that rivaled that of the potent technique of retrieval practice. In contrast, despite recalling more than twice the study content that the concept-mapping group did, learners who practiced retrieval were unable to generate more "create"-level research questions based on that content. Three supplemental experiments (N = 168) further showed that retrieval practice consistently did not improve higher-order question generation over restudying, despite yielding superior long-term retention. Altogether, these findings reveal that simply possessing a wealth of factual knowledge is insufficient for generating higher-order research questions that create new knowledge. Rather, teaching others is a powerful strategy for producing deep and durable learning that enables research question generation. To ask better questions, teach.
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: As Provided
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2023
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: EJ1386318
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1386318
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1037/edu0000802
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 15
        StartPage: 798
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Peer Teaching
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Research Skills
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Teaching Methods
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Concept Mapping
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Science Education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Instructional Effectiveness
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Thinking Skills
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Recall (Psychology)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Retention (Psychology)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Undergraduate Students
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Foreign Countries
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Science Process Skills
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Singapore
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: To Ask Better Questions, Teach: Learning-by-Teaching Enhances Research Question Generation More than Retrieval Practice and Concept-Mapping
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Wong, Sarah Shi Hui
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Lim, Kagen Y. L.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Lim, Stephen Wee Hun
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 08
              Type: published
              Y: 2023
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 0022-0663
            – Type: issn-electronic
              Value: 1939-2176
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 115
            – Type: issue
              Value: 6
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Journal of Educational Psychology
              Type: main
ResultId 1