To Ask Better Questions, Teach: Learning-by-Teaching Enhances Research Question Generation More than Retrieval Practice and Concept-Mapping
Saved in:
| Title: | To Ask Better Questions, Teach: Learning-by-Teaching Enhances Research Question Generation More than Retrieval Practice and Concept-Mapping |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Wong, Sarah Shi Hui (ORCID |
| Source: | Journal of Educational Psychology. Aug 2023 115(6):798-812. |
| Availability: | American Psychological Association. Journals Department, 750 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20002. Tel: 800-374-2721; Tel: 202-336-5510; Fax: 202-336-5502; e-mail: order@apa.org; Web site: http://www.apa.org |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 15 |
| Publication Date: | 2023 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Higher Education Postsecondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Peer Teaching, Research Skills, Teaching Methods, Concept Mapping, Science Education, Instructional Effectiveness, Thinking Skills, Recall (Psychology), Retention (Psychology), Undergraduate Students, Foreign Countries, Science Process Skills |
| Geographic Terms: | Singapore |
| DOI: | 10.1037/edu0000802 |
| ISSN: | 0022-0663 1939-2176 |
| Abstract: | Asking good questions is vital for scientific learning and discovery, but improving this complex skill is a formidable challenge. Here, we show in two experiments (N = 152) that teaching others--"learning-by-teaching"--enhances one's ability to generate higher-order research questions that create new knowledge, relative to two other well-established generative learning techniques: retrieval practice and concept-mapping. Learners who taught scientific expository texts across natural and social sciences topics by delivering video-recorded lectures outperformed their peers who practiced retrieval or constructed concept maps when tested on their ability to generate "create"-level research questions based on the texts (Experiment 1). This advantage held reliably even on a delayed test 48 hr later, and when all learners similarly received and responded to post-study questions on the material (Experiment 2). Moreover, across both immediate and delayed tests, learning-by-teaching produced a recall benefit that rivaled that of the potent technique of retrieval practice. In contrast, despite recalling more than twice the study content that the concept-mapping group did, learners who practiced retrieval were unable to generate more "create"-level research questions based on that content. Three supplemental experiments (N = 168) further showed that retrieval practice consistently did not improve higher-order question generation over restudying, despite yielding superior long-term retention. Altogether, these findings reveal that simply possessing a wealth of factual knowledge is insufficient for generating higher-order research questions that create new knowledge. Rather, teaching others is a powerful strategy for producing deep and durable learning that enables research question generation. To ask better questions, teach. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2023 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1386318 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1386318 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: To Ask Better Questions, Teach: Learning-by-Teaching Enhances Research Question Generation More than Retrieval Practice and Concept-Mapping – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Wong%2C+Sarah+Shi+Hui%22">Wong, Sarah Shi Hui</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4243-212X">0000-0003-4243-212X</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Lim%2C+Kagen+Y%2E+L%2E%22">Lim, Kagen Y. L.</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4868-1127">0000-0003-4868-1127</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Lim%2C+Stephen+Wee+Hun%22">Lim, Stephen Wee Hun</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3636-7587">0000-0003-3636-7587</externalLink>) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Journal+of+Educational+Psychology%22"><i>Journal of Educational Psychology</i></searchLink>. Aug 2023 115(6):798-812. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: American Psychological Association. Journals Department, 750 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20002. Tel: 800-374-2721; Tel: 202-336-5510; Fax: 202-336-5502; e-mail: order@apa.org; Web site: http://www.apa.org – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 15 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2023 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Peer+Teaching%22">Peer Teaching</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+Skills%22">Research Skills</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teaching+Methods%22">Teaching Methods</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Concept+Mapping%22">Concept Mapping</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Science+Education%22">Science Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Instructional+Effectiveness%22">Instructional Effectiveness</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Thinking+Skills%22">Thinking Skills</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Recall+%28Psychology%29%22">Recall (Psychology)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Retention+%28Psychology%29%22">Retention (Psychology)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Undergraduate+Students%22">Undergraduate Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Foreign+Countries%22">Foreign Countries</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Science+Process+Skills%22">Science Process Skills</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Singapore%22">Singapore</searchLink> – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1037/edu0000802 – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 0022-0663<br />1939-2176 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Asking good questions is vital for scientific learning and discovery, but improving this complex skill is a formidable challenge. Here, we show in two experiments (N = 152) that teaching others--"learning-by-teaching"--enhances one's ability to generate higher-order research questions that create new knowledge, relative to two other well-established generative learning techniques: retrieval practice and concept-mapping. Learners who taught scientific expository texts across natural and social sciences topics by delivering video-recorded lectures outperformed their peers who practiced retrieval or constructed concept maps when tested on their ability to generate "create"-level research questions based on the texts (Experiment 1). This advantage held reliably even on a delayed test 48 hr later, and when all learners similarly received and responded to post-study questions on the material (Experiment 2). Moreover, across both immediate and delayed tests, learning-by-teaching produced a recall benefit that rivaled that of the potent technique of retrieval practice. In contrast, despite recalling more than twice the study content that the concept-mapping group did, learners who practiced retrieval were unable to generate more "create"-level research questions based on that content. Three supplemental experiments (N = 168) further showed that retrieval practice consistently did not improve higher-order question generation over restudying, despite yielding superior long-term retention. Altogether, these findings reveal that simply possessing a wealth of factual knowledge is insufficient for generating higher-order research questions that create new knowledge. Rather, teaching others is a powerful strategy for producing deep and durable learning that enables research question generation. To ask better questions, teach. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2023 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1386318 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1386318 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1037/edu0000802 Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 15 StartPage: 798 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Peer Teaching Type: general – SubjectFull: Research Skills Type: general – SubjectFull: Teaching Methods Type: general – SubjectFull: Concept Mapping Type: general – SubjectFull: Science Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Instructional Effectiveness Type: general – SubjectFull: Thinking Skills Type: general – SubjectFull: Recall (Psychology) Type: general – SubjectFull: Retention (Psychology) Type: general – SubjectFull: Undergraduate Students Type: general – SubjectFull: Foreign Countries Type: general – SubjectFull: Science Process Skills Type: general – SubjectFull: Singapore Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: To Ask Better Questions, Teach: Learning-by-Teaching Enhances Research Question Generation More than Retrieval Practice and Concept-Mapping Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Wong, Sarah Shi Hui – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Lim, Kagen Y. L. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Lim, Stephen Wee Hun IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 08 Type: published Y: 2023 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 0022-0663 – Type: issn-electronic Value: 1939-2176 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 115 – Type: issue Value: 6 Titles: – TitleFull: Journal of Educational Psychology Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |