Critical Awareness toward Content-Language Integrated Education for Multilingual Learners (CA-CIEML): A Survey Study about Teachers' Ideological Beliefs and Attitudes

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Critical Awareness toward Content-Language Integrated Education for Multilingual Learners (CA-CIEML): A Survey Study about Teachers' Ideological Beliefs and Attitudes
Language: English
Authors: Sujin Kim (ORCID 0000-0002-4219-454X), Jung Yeon Park (ORCID 0000-0001-8473-9416)
Source: Language Awareness. 2024 33(2):261-283.
Availability: Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 23
Publication Date: 2024
Sponsoring Agency: Department of Education (ED)
Contract Number: T365Z210097
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: Elementary Secondary Education
Descriptors: Metalinguistics, Content and Language Integrated Learning, Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction, Teacher Attitudes, Factor Analysis, Teacher Role, English (Second Language), Language Teachers, Elementary Secondary Education, Teaching Methods, Teacher Characteristics, Language Attitudes, Language Usage, Course Content, Native Language, STEM Education
DOI: 10.1080/09658416.2024.2321895
ISSN: 0965-8416
1747-7565
Abstract: Framed by the concept of critical language awareness, this study validated a survey to assess teachers' ideological beliefs and attitudes toward English learners (ELs)/multilingual learners (MLs) in content classrooms. Employing exploratory factor analysis (EFA), the study identified three major constructs of teachers' beliefs and attitudes from a relatively large sample across the U.S. (N = 307). The study further examined whether differences in the constructs can be explained by the teacher's primary role (ESOL vs Content), teaching grade (elementary vs secondary), and subject of teaching (STEM, non-STEM, or both), while controlling for years of teaching as a covariate. Results suggested that ESOL teachers were more inclined toward language-integrated content teaching with a greater level of sensitivity to ELs/MLs than content teachers. For elementary education, content teachers were more inclined toward English-only monolingual pedagogy than ESOL teachers. Teachers of STEM subjects were less inclined toward language-­integrated pedagogy than other teachers. Given the critical role of underlying ideologies in teachers' practices, we argue that a more in-depth self-examination is necessary for teachers to obtain critical awareness of their pedagogical practice. This study adds new insights to the research on critical language awareness by addressing the needs of ELs/MLs in content classrooms.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2024
Accession Number: EJ1424320
Database: ERIC
Description
Abstract:Framed by the concept of critical language awareness, this study validated a survey to assess teachers' ideological beliefs and attitudes toward English learners (ELs)/multilingual learners (MLs) in content classrooms. Employing exploratory factor analysis (EFA), the study identified three major constructs of teachers' beliefs and attitudes from a relatively large sample across the U.S. (N = 307). The study further examined whether differences in the constructs can be explained by the teacher's primary role (ESOL vs Content), teaching grade (elementary vs secondary), and subject of teaching (STEM, non-STEM, or both), while controlling for years of teaching as a covariate. Results suggested that ESOL teachers were more inclined toward language-integrated content teaching with a greater level of sensitivity to ELs/MLs than content teachers. For elementary education, content teachers were more inclined toward English-only monolingual pedagogy than ESOL teachers. Teachers of STEM subjects were less inclined toward language-­integrated pedagogy than other teachers. Given the critical role of underlying ideologies in teachers' practices, we argue that a more in-depth self-examination is necessary for teachers to obtain critical awareness of their pedagogical practice. This study adds new insights to the research on critical language awareness by addressing the needs of ELs/MLs in content classrooms.
ISSN:0965-8416
1747-7565
DOI:10.1080/09658416.2024.2321895