Evaluating Evidence for the Reliability and Validity of Lexical Diversity Indices in L2 Oral Task Responses
Saved in:
| Title: | Evaluating Evidence for the Reliability and Validity of Lexical Diversity Indices in L2 Oral Task Responses |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Kristopher Kyle (ORCID |
| Source: | Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 2024 46(1):278-299. |
| Availability: | Cambridge University Press. 100 Brook Hill Drive, West Nyack, NY 10994. Tel: 800-872-7423; Tel: 845-353-7500; Fax: 845-353-4141; e-mail: subscriptions_newyork@cambridge.org; Web site: https://www.cambridge.org/core/what-we-publish/journals |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 22 |
| Publication Date: | 2024 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Descriptors: | Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction, Oral Language, Validity, Reliability, Language Proficiency, Vocabulary Skills, Task Analysis, Speech Communication, Computational Linguistics, Written Language, Scores, Correlation, Indexes |
| DOI: | 10.1017/S0272263123000402 |
| ISSN: | 0272-2631 1470-1545 |
| Abstract: | Although lexical diversity is often used as a measure of productive proficiency (e.g., as an aspect of lexical complexity) in SLA studies involving oral tasks, relatively little research has been conducted to support the reliability and/or validity of these indices in spoken contexts. Furthermore, SLA researchers commonly use indices of lexical diversity such as Root TTR (Guiraud's index) and D (vocd-D and HD-D) that have been preliminarily shown to lack reliability in spoken L2 contexts and/or have been consistently shown to lack reliability in written L2 contexts. In this study, we empirically evaluate lexical diversity indices with respect to two aspects of reliability (text-length independence and across-task stability) and one aspect of validity (relationship with proficiency scores). The results indicated that neither Root TTR nor D is reliable across different text lengths. However, support for the reliability and validity of optimized versions of MATTR and MTLD was found. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2024 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1438127 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1438127 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Evaluating Evidence for the Reliability and Validity of Lexical Diversity Indices in L2 Oral Task Responses – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Kristopher+Kyle%22">Kristopher Kyle</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5415-9672">0000-0001-5415-9672</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Hakyung+Sung%22">Hakyung Sung</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Masaki+Eguchi%22">Masaki Eguchi</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0791-4935">0000-0002-0791-4935</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Fred+Zenker%22">Fred Zenker</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1620-6690">0000-0002-1620-6690</externalLink>) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Studies+in+Second+Language+Acquisition%22"><i>Studies in Second Language Acquisition</i></searchLink>. 2024 46(1):278-299. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Cambridge University Press. 100 Brook Hill Drive, West Nyack, NY 10994. Tel: 800-872-7423; Tel: 845-353-7500; Fax: 845-353-4141; e-mail: subscriptions_newyork@cambridge.org; Web site: https://www.cambridge.org/core/what-we-publish/journals – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 22 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2024 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Second+Language+Learning%22">Second Language Learning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Second+Language+Instruction%22">Second Language Instruction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Oral+Language%22">Oral Language</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Validity%22">Validity</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Reliability%22">Reliability</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Language+Proficiency%22">Language Proficiency</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Vocabulary+Skills%22">Vocabulary Skills</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Task+Analysis%22">Task Analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Speech+Communication%22">Speech Communication</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Computational+Linguistics%22">Computational Linguistics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Written+Language%22">Written Language</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Scores%22">Scores</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Correlation%22">Correlation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Indexes%22">Indexes</searchLink> – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1017/S0272263123000402 – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 0272-2631<br />1470-1545 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Although lexical diversity is often used as a measure of productive proficiency (e.g., as an aspect of lexical complexity) in SLA studies involving oral tasks, relatively little research has been conducted to support the reliability and/or validity of these indices in spoken contexts. Furthermore, SLA researchers commonly use indices of lexical diversity such as Root TTR (Guiraud's index) and D (vocd-D and HD-D) that have been preliminarily shown to lack reliability in spoken L2 contexts and/or have been consistently shown to lack reliability in written L2 contexts. In this study, we empirically evaluate lexical diversity indices with respect to two aspects of reliability (text-length independence and across-task stability) and one aspect of validity (relationship with proficiency scores). The results indicated that neither Root TTR nor D is reliable across different text lengths. However, support for the reliability and validity of optimized versions of MATTR and MTLD was found. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2024 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1438127 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1438127 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1017/S0272263123000402 Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 22 StartPage: 278 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Second Language Learning Type: general – SubjectFull: Second Language Instruction Type: general – SubjectFull: Oral Language Type: general – SubjectFull: Validity Type: general – SubjectFull: Reliability Type: general – SubjectFull: Language Proficiency Type: general – SubjectFull: Vocabulary Skills Type: general – SubjectFull: Task Analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Speech Communication Type: general – SubjectFull: Computational Linguistics Type: general – SubjectFull: Written Language Type: general – SubjectFull: Scores Type: general – SubjectFull: Correlation Type: general – SubjectFull: Indexes Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Evaluating Evidence for the Reliability and Validity of Lexical Diversity Indices in L2 Oral Task Responses Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Kristopher Kyle – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Hakyung Sung – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Masaki Eguchi – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Fred Zenker IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 03 Type: published Y: 2024 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 0272-2631 – Type: issn-electronic Value: 1470-1545 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 46 – Type: issue Value: 1 Titles: – TitleFull: Studies in Second Language Acquisition Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |