Historical Architecture Pedagogy Meets Virtual Technologies: A Comparative Case Study
Saved in:
| Title: | Historical Architecture Pedagogy Meets Virtual Technologies: A Comparative Case Study |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Xiang-Min Guo, Dan-Cen Wang, Tian-Tian Lo (ORCID |
| Source: | Education and Information Technologies. 2024 29(12):14835-14874. |
| Availability: | Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/ |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 40 |
| Publication Date: | 2024 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research Tests/Questionnaires |
| Education Level: | Higher Education Postsecondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Architectural Education, Educational Technology, Computer Simulation, Technology Uses in Education, College Students, Majors (Students), History, Instructional Effectiveness |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s10639-023-12420-1 |
| ISSN: | 1360-2357 1573-7608 |
| Abstract: | The immersive experience and diverse interaction modes provided by virtual digital technology match the spatial sensitivity and practical ability required in the field of architectural teaching, and its technological advantages can significantly enhance teaching outcomes. However, in the field of architecture teaching, there has been a lack of discussion on the suitability of different virtual technologies and teaching scenarios for historical buildings. Therefore, this study constructed a comprehensive adaptive evaluation system for virtual technology and selected 360-degree panoramic technology (360-degree PT), Immersive Virtual Reality (IVR) technology, and Desktop Virtual Reality (DVR) technology as representatives for empirical study. The research method used in this experiment is a questionnaire survey, involving a total of 60 students majoring in architecture and planning, with a certain foundation in historical architecture knowledge. Multiple statistical methods are employed to analyze the data. The experimental data indicates that IVR technology performs the best in terms of learning outcomes, learning autonomy, and sense of presence, making it suitable for immersive and interactive learning needs. 360-degree PT demonstrates the best perception of architectural features, catering to the demand for visual effects. DVR technology exhibits the highest learning efficiency, meeting the need for simplicity, efficiency, and widespread application. On the other hand, augmented reality (AR) technology and mixed reality (MR) technology have lower adaptability and do not meet the learning requirements for immersive spatial experiences. This study is expected to provide a new technical pathway for teaching historical buildings and serve as a systematic reference for selecting specific technologies. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2024 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1439754 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1439754 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Historical Architecture Pedagogy Meets Virtual Technologies: A Comparative Case Study – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Xiang-Min+Guo%22">Xiang-Min Guo</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Dan-Cen+Wang%22">Dan-Cen Wang</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Tian-Tian+Lo%22">Tian-Tian Lo</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1992-0777">0000-0002-1992-0777</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Xiao-Hong+Huang%22">Xiao-Hong Huang</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Education+and+Information+Technologies%22"><i>Education and Information Technologies</i></searchLink>. 2024 29(12):14835-14874. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/ – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 40 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2024 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research<br />Tests/Questionnaires – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Architectural+Education%22">Architectural Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Technology%22">Educational Technology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Computer+Simulation%22">Computer Simulation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Technology+Uses+in+Education%22">Technology Uses in Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+Students%22">College Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Majors+%28Students%29%22">Majors (Students)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22History%22">History</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Instructional+Effectiveness%22">Instructional Effectiveness</searchLink> – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1007/s10639-023-12420-1 – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 1360-2357<br />1573-7608 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: The immersive experience and diverse interaction modes provided by virtual digital technology match the spatial sensitivity and practical ability required in the field of architectural teaching, and its technological advantages can significantly enhance teaching outcomes. However, in the field of architecture teaching, there has been a lack of discussion on the suitability of different virtual technologies and teaching scenarios for historical buildings. Therefore, this study constructed a comprehensive adaptive evaluation system for virtual technology and selected 360-degree panoramic technology (360-degree PT), Immersive Virtual Reality (IVR) technology, and Desktop Virtual Reality (DVR) technology as representatives for empirical study. The research method used in this experiment is a questionnaire survey, involving a total of 60 students majoring in architecture and planning, with a certain foundation in historical architecture knowledge. Multiple statistical methods are employed to analyze the data. The experimental data indicates that IVR technology performs the best in terms of learning outcomes, learning autonomy, and sense of presence, making it suitable for immersive and interactive learning needs. 360-degree PT demonstrates the best perception of architectural features, catering to the demand for visual effects. DVR technology exhibits the highest learning efficiency, meeting the need for simplicity, efficiency, and widespread application. On the other hand, augmented reality (AR) technology and mixed reality (MR) technology have lower adaptability and do not meet the learning requirements for immersive spatial experiences. This study is expected to provide a new technical pathway for teaching historical buildings and serve as a systematic reference for selecting specific technologies. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2024 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1439754 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1439754 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1007/s10639-023-12420-1 Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 40 StartPage: 14835 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Architectural Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational Technology Type: general – SubjectFull: Computer Simulation Type: general – SubjectFull: Technology Uses in Education Type: general – SubjectFull: College Students Type: general – SubjectFull: Majors (Students) Type: general – SubjectFull: History Type: general – SubjectFull: Instructional Effectiveness Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Historical Architecture Pedagogy Meets Virtual Technologies: A Comparative Case Study Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Xiang-Min Guo – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Dan-Cen Wang – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Tian-Tian Lo – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Xiao-Hong Huang IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 08 Type: published Y: 2024 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 1360-2357 – Type: issn-electronic Value: 1573-7608 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 29 – Type: issue Value: 12 Titles: – TitleFull: Education and Information Technologies Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |