A Systematic Review of Evaluation and Program Planning Strategies for Technology Integration in Education: Insights for Evidence-Based Practice
Saved in:
| Title: | A Systematic Review of Evaluation and Program Planning Strategies for Technology Integration in Education: Insights for Evidence-Based Practice |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Zhimin Luo, Babar Nawaz Abbasi (ORCID |
| Source: | Education and Information Technologies. 2024 29(16):21133-21167. |
| Availability: | Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/ |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 35 |
| Publication Date: | 2024 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Information Analyses |
| Descriptors: | Technology Integration, Computer Uses in Education, Technology Planning, Strategic Planning, Evidence Based Practice, Curriculum Evaluation, Curriculum Implementation, Teaching Methods, Program Development, Program Evaluation, Program Implementation |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s10639-024-12707-x |
| ISSN: | 1360-2357 1573-7608 |
| Abstract: | This paper presents a systematic review of the literature on evaluation and program planning strategies for technology integration in education. The aim of the review was to examine the evidence on different types of strategies that can be used to design, implement, assess, and improve technology integration in educational settings, as well as the factors that influence their success. The review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and searched four databases for relevant studies published between 2010 to May 2023. A total of 124 studies met the inclusion criteria and were appraised for quality using multiple quality assessment tools. The findings were synthesized using a narrative synthesis approach. The review identified and compared various models and approaches for technology integration, such as design-based research, logic model, backward design, Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation (ADDIE) model, and Substitution, Augmentation, Modification, and Redefinition (SAMR) model. It also explored how organizational, technological, pedagogical, teacher, and student factors interact with the evaluation and program planning strategies and affect the outcomes of technology integration. Furthermore, the review has highlighted the importance of evidence-based practice in technology integration and the need for continuous improvement based on data from multiple sources and methods. Moreover, this review also discussed the limitations and challenges of the review and suggested directions for future research and policy development. Besides, the review contributes to the existing literature on technology integration in education by providing a comprehensive and systematic analysis of the evaluation and program planning strategies and their interaction with various factors that influence their success. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2024 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1450650 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1450650 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: A Systematic Review of Evaluation and Program Planning Strategies for Technology Integration in Education: Insights for Evidence-Based Practice – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Zhimin+Luo%22">Zhimin Luo</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Babar+Nawaz+Abbasi%22">Babar Nawaz Abbasi</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2298-339X">0000-0002-2298-339X</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Chong+Yang%22">Chong Yang</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Jiayin+Li%22">Jiayin Li</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ali+Sohail%22">Ali Sohail</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Education+and+Information+Technologies%22"><i>Education and Information Technologies</i></searchLink>. 2024 29(16):21133-21167. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/ – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 35 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2024 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Information Analyses – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Technology+Integration%22">Technology Integration</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Computer+Uses+in+Education%22">Computer Uses in Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Technology+Planning%22">Technology Planning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Strategic+Planning%22">Strategic Planning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evidence+Based+Practice%22">Evidence Based Practice</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Curriculum+Evaluation%22">Curriculum Evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Curriculum+Implementation%22">Curriculum Implementation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teaching+Methods%22">Teaching Methods</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Program+Development%22">Program Development</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Program+Evaluation%22">Program Evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Program+Implementation%22">Program Implementation</searchLink> – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1007/s10639-024-12707-x – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 1360-2357<br />1573-7608 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: This paper presents a systematic review of the literature on evaluation and program planning strategies for technology integration in education. The aim of the review was to examine the evidence on different types of strategies that can be used to design, implement, assess, and improve technology integration in educational settings, as well as the factors that influence their success. The review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and searched four databases for relevant studies published between 2010 to May 2023. A total of 124 studies met the inclusion criteria and were appraised for quality using multiple quality assessment tools. The findings were synthesized using a narrative synthesis approach. The review identified and compared various models and approaches for technology integration, such as design-based research, logic model, backward design, Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation (ADDIE) model, and Substitution, Augmentation, Modification, and Redefinition (SAMR) model. It also explored how organizational, technological, pedagogical, teacher, and student factors interact with the evaluation and program planning strategies and affect the outcomes of technology integration. Furthermore, the review has highlighted the importance of evidence-based practice in technology integration and the need for continuous improvement based on data from multiple sources and methods. Moreover, this review also discussed the limitations and challenges of the review and suggested directions for future research and policy development. Besides, the review contributes to the existing literature on technology integration in education by providing a comprehensive and systematic analysis of the evaluation and program planning strategies and their interaction with various factors that influence their success. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2024 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1450650 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1450650 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1007/s10639-024-12707-x Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 35 StartPage: 21133 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Technology Integration Type: general – SubjectFull: Computer Uses in Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Technology Planning Type: general – SubjectFull: Strategic Planning Type: general – SubjectFull: Evidence Based Practice Type: general – SubjectFull: Curriculum Evaluation Type: general – SubjectFull: Curriculum Implementation Type: general – SubjectFull: Teaching Methods Type: general – SubjectFull: Program Development Type: general – SubjectFull: Program Evaluation Type: general – SubjectFull: Program Implementation Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: A Systematic Review of Evaluation and Program Planning Strategies for Technology Integration in Education: Insights for Evidence-Based Practice Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Zhimin Luo – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Babar Nawaz Abbasi – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Chong Yang – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Jiayin Li – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Ali Sohail IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 11 Type: published Y: 2024 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 1360-2357 – Type: issn-electronic Value: 1573-7608 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 29 – Type: issue Value: 16 Titles: – TitleFull: Education and Information Technologies Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |