The Effect of Memory and Presentation Mode in Melodic Error Detection
Saved in:
| Title: | The Effect of Memory and Presentation Mode in Melodic Error Detection |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Bryan E. Nichols (ORCID |
| Source: | Journal of Research in Music Education. 2025 72(4):376-394. |
| Availability: | SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: https://sagepub.com |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 19 |
| Publication Date: | 2025 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Higher Education Postsecondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Music Education, Error Patterns, Auditory Stimuli, Short Term Memory, Student Characteristics, Auditory Perception, Majors (Students), Visual Stimuli, College Students, Recall (Psychology) |
| Assessment and Survey Identifiers: | Digit Span Test |
| DOI: | 10.1177/00224294231225408 |
| ISSN: | 0022-4294 1945-0095 |
| Abstract: | Previous research has variably indicated the role of working memory in error detection by which working memory played a role in rhythmic error detection but not melodic error detection. Here, we devised a longer melodic error detection task for college musicians in an auditory, rather than visual, condition using classical excerpts, which we compared to briefer visual and auditory control conditions. These tests were compared to performance on a test of verbal working memory (forward digit span test) and an experimenter-created tonal working memory test. The tonal working memory test was positively related to the forward digit span test, the melodic error detection, and the visual control but not to the auditory control. Performance on the error detection test was not significantly related to year in school, level of aural skills class, years of private piano, or level of group piano class. Our participants performed similarly on the aurally presented melodic error detection of classical excerpts and the briefer visual control but not on the briefer aural control. Among other variables, years of experience on a second instrument was a significant predictor of error detection skill. High familiarity ratings with a classical excerpt did not yield a relationship to error detection performance. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2025 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1457542 |
| Database: | ERIC |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
Be the first to leave a comment!
