Feedback and Formative Assessment--Looking Backwards to Move Forward
Saved in:
| Title: | Feedback and Formative Assessment--Looking Backwards to Move Forward |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Nora McCarthy (ORCID |
| Source: | Discover Education. 2025 4. |
| Availability: | Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/ |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 7 |
| Publication Date: | 2025 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Evaluative |
| Descriptors: | Feedback (Response), Formative Evaluation, Definitions, Language Usage, Medical Education, Competency Based Education |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s44217-025-00414-9 |
| ISSN: | 2731-5525 |
| Abstract: | The terms 'feedback' and 'formative assessment' are ubiquitous in education, but their conceptual boundaries are ill-defined. This perspective piece explores the meaning of 'feedback' and 'formative assessment', revealing the entanglement and confusion that exists between these two terms. An argument for clarity of terms is made, to avoid ambiguity and to create a common language. A suggestion is made to re-embrace the original definition components of 'feedback', as all of the original parameters of this term, when well established in industry and biology, did not migrate into education. Incorporating the original definition components into the current definition of 'feedback' in education circles may negate the need for the term 'formative assessment' altogether, which carries with it the inevitable negative connotations associated with the word assessment. Words matter. Medical education, with the introduction of competency-based medical education (CBME) and entrustable professional activities offers a timely opportunity to re-visit such terms, with 'feedback' and 'formative assessment' being central to these processes. While we use medical education as an example to explore how looking backwards and incorporating all aspects of the original feedback definition can help us to move forward with clarity of terms, we mainly seek to bring new perspectives and hope to encourage necessary conversations on 'feedback' and 'formative assessment' entanglement. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2025 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1461134 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1461134 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Feedback and Formative Assessment--Looking Backwards to Move Forward – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Nora+McCarthy%22">Nora McCarthy</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4709-8290">0000-0002-4709-8290</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Karen+Neville%22">Karen Neville</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8751-6290">0000-0002-8751-6290</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Andrew+Pope%22">Andrew Pope</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0685-5061">0000-0003-0685-5061</externalLink>) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Discover+Education%22"><i>Discover Education</i></searchLink>. 2025 4. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/ – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 7 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2025 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Evaluative – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Feedback+%28Response%29%22">Feedback (Response)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Formative+Evaluation%22">Formative Evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Definitions%22">Definitions</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Language+Usage%22">Language Usage</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medical+Education%22">Medical Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Competency+Based+Education%22">Competency Based Education</searchLink> – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1007/s44217-025-00414-9 – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 2731-5525 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: The terms 'feedback' and 'formative assessment' are ubiquitous in education, but their conceptual boundaries are ill-defined. This perspective piece explores the meaning of 'feedback' and 'formative assessment', revealing the entanglement and confusion that exists between these two terms. An argument for clarity of terms is made, to avoid ambiguity and to create a common language. A suggestion is made to re-embrace the original definition components of 'feedback', as all of the original parameters of this term, when well established in industry and biology, did not migrate into education. Incorporating the original definition components into the current definition of 'feedback' in education circles may negate the need for the term 'formative assessment' altogether, which carries with it the inevitable negative connotations associated with the word assessment. Words matter. Medical education, with the introduction of competency-based medical education (CBME) and entrustable professional activities offers a timely opportunity to re-visit such terms, with 'feedback' and 'formative assessment' being central to these processes. While we use medical education as an example to explore how looking backwards and incorporating all aspects of the original feedback definition can help us to move forward with clarity of terms, we mainly seek to bring new perspectives and hope to encourage necessary conversations on 'feedback' and 'formative assessment' entanglement. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2025 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1461134 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1461134 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1007/s44217-025-00414-9 Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 7 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Feedback (Response) Type: general – SubjectFull: Formative Evaluation Type: general – SubjectFull: Definitions Type: general – SubjectFull: Language Usage Type: general – SubjectFull: Medical Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Competency Based Education Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Feedback and Formative Assessment--Looking Backwards to Move Forward Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Nora McCarthy – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Karen Neville – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Andrew Pope IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 12 Type: published Y: 2025 Identifiers: – Type: issn-electronic Value: 2731-5525 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 4 Titles: – TitleFull: Discover Education Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |