Competency-Based Testing and Credentialing: Addressing Inequity in Adult Education via State Policy Reform
Saved in:
| Title: | Competency-Based Testing and Credentialing: Addressing Inequity in Adult Education via State Policy Reform |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Austin S. Jennings (ORCID |
| Source: | Education Policy Analysis Archives. 2025 33(3). |
| Availability: | Colleges of Education at Arizona State University and the University of South Florida. c/o Editor, USF EDU162, 4202 East Fowler Avenue, Tampa, FL 33620-5650. Tel: 813-974-3400; Fax: 813-974-3826; Web site: https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/index.php/epaa |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 23 |
| Publication Date: | 2025 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Adult Education High Schools High School Equivalency Programs Secondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Competency Based Education, Minimum Competency Testing, Credentials, Equal Education, State Policy, Adult Education, Educational Change, Equivalency Tests, High School Equivalency Programs, Scores, Educational Policy, Alignment (Education), Validity, Educational Attainment |
| Assessment and Survey Identifiers: | General Educational Development Tests |
| ISSN: | 1068-2341 |
| Abstract: | Competency-based testing and credentialing (CBTC) initiatives aim to address inequity in adult education by fundamentally changing how states use GED®, HiSET®, and TASC™ test scores to award and withhold high school equivalency credentials. However, CBTC is inconsistent with how developers intend states to use those scores. Accordingly, it falls on states to evidence the validity of such interpretations. In the present study, I do just that -- analyzing the extent to which GED®, HiSET®, and TASC™ test scores reflect interchangeable measures of academic attainment for the purpose of credentialing high school completion. Findings suggest high alignment between these tests across all sources and types of validity evidence. This finding -- that CBTC-oriented use of GED®, HiSET®, and TASC™ test scores is valid -- may appear simple, but the policy implications are complex. Considerations range from how states should handle non-authorized test scores to how they can support stakeholders' understanding of those scores. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2025 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1463512 |
| Database: | ERIC |
Be the first to leave a comment!
