Students' Scientific Reasoning in Physics through Procedural and Conceptual E-Scaffolding in Modelling Instruction: A Quasi-Experimental Study
Saved in:
| Title: | Students' Scientific Reasoning in Physics through Procedural and Conceptual E-Scaffolding in Modelling Instruction: A Quasi-Experimental Study |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Annisa Ulfa Yana (ORCID |
| Source: | Journal of Learning for Development. 2025 12(1):17-32. |
| Availability: | Commonwealth of Learning. 4710 Kingsway Suite 2500, Burnaby, BC V5H 4M2 Canada. Tel: 604-775-8200; Fax: 604-775-8210; e-mail: jl4d@col.org; Web site: http://www.col.org |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 16 |
| Publication Date: | 2025 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | High Schools Secondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Science Process Skills, Thinking Skills, Abstract Reasoning, Physics, Science Instruction, Scaffolding (Teaching Technique), High School Students, Foreign Countries, Modeling (Psychology), Science Tests |
| Geographic Terms: | Indonesia |
| ISSN: | 2311-1550 |
| Abstract: | Procedural and conceptual e-scaffolding has been shown to be effective for assisting novice learners in understanding new concepts. Its integration with modelling instructions (E-MI) raises expectations for improving scientific reasoning (SR) in students whose level is still a concern in Indonesia. A quasi-experimental study was conducted to find out if there was a difference between e-scaffolding and a regular modelling instruction (MI) class; how integration affected the shift in students' SR levels; and the effect size on students' SR in physics. A total of 70 first-year high school science class students in East Java, Indonesia participated in this study, and were randomly divided into two groups with different treatments. The experimental group with E-MI (n = 35) and the control group with MI (n = 35) received a 15-item scientific reasoning test ([alpha] = 0.828), and the data were analysed by t-test. The difference in SR between the EMI and MI group was found to be statistically significant. As a result, students who learned physics through E-MI exhibited higher levels of SR compared to students who took only an MI course. In the E-MI group, elevating the SR level for students at the transitional level was relatively easier than for students at the concrete level. Integrating procedural and conceptual e-scaffolding in modelling instructions also had a large influence on students' SR in physics. In conclusion, the findings of this study underscored the importance of technology in education. E-scaffolding facilitated the augmentation of students' SR levels, excluding the operationally concrete SR levels. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2025 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1465401 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| Abstract: | Procedural and conceptual e-scaffolding has been shown to be effective for assisting novice learners in understanding new concepts. Its integration with modelling instructions (E-MI) raises expectations for improving scientific reasoning (SR) in students whose level is still a concern in Indonesia. A quasi-experimental study was conducted to find out if there was a difference between e-scaffolding and a regular modelling instruction (MI) class; how integration affected the shift in students' SR levels; and the effect size on students' SR in physics. A total of 70 first-year high school science class students in East Java, Indonesia participated in this study, and were randomly divided into two groups with different treatments. The experimental group with E-MI (n = 35) and the control group with MI (n = 35) received a 15-item scientific reasoning test ([alpha] = 0.828), and the data were analysed by t-test. The difference in SR between the EMI and MI group was found to be statistically significant. As a result, students who learned physics through E-MI exhibited higher levels of SR compared to students who took only an MI course. In the E-MI group, elevating the SR level for students at the transitional level was relatively easier than for students at the concrete level. Integrating procedural and conceptual e-scaffolding in modelling instructions also had a large influence on students' SR in physics. In conclusion, the findings of this study underscored the importance of technology in education. E-scaffolding facilitated the augmentation of students' SR levels, excluding the operationally concrete SR levels. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2311-1550 |
