Establishing the Research Priorities of ADHD Professionals: An International Delphi Study

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Establishing the Research Priorities of ADHD Professionals: An International Delphi Study
Language: English
Authors: Kate Stephens (ORCID 0000-0003-4047-0173), Emma Sciberras (ORCID 0000-0003-2812-303X), Matthew Bisset, Ainsley Summerton (ORCID 0000-0002-6732-5294), David Coghill, Christel M. Middeldorp, Leanne Payne, Mark A. Bellgrove, Stephen V. Faraone, Tobias Banaschewski, Jeffery H. Newcorn, Stacey D. Espinet, Iris Manor, Mohammed M. J. Alqahtani (ORCID 0000-0002-8222-3130), Jeremy Varnham, Timothy J. Silk (ORCID 0000-0002-7290-512X)
Source: Journal of Attention Disorders. 2025 29(5):303-311.
Availability: SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: https://sagepub.com
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 9
Publication Date: 2025
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Global Approach, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, Research and Development, Research Design, Delphi Technique, Questioning Techniques, Females, Drug Use, Intervention, Rating Scales, Emotional Adjustment, Needs Assessment, Participative Decision Making, Research Committees, Research, International Cooperation
Geographic Terms: Australia, Europe, United States, Israel, Canada, Asia, Saudi Arabia
DOI: 10.1177/10870547241307739
ISSN: 1087-0547
1557-1246
Abstract: Objectives: To determine ADHD research priorities from the perspective of ADHD professionals internationally. Method: A two-stage modified Delphi design was used. In Stage 1 (qualitative), participants listed research questions relating to ADHD that they perceived to be most important (N = 132). In Stage 2 (quantitative), participants were then asked to rate each research question that was deemed appropriate (able to be researched and not already addressed by research) in terms of perceived importance (N = 180). Results: Stage 1 generated 382 research questions with 10 broad areas identified for example, co-occurring conditions and treatment, etc. The top 20 most important questions related to ADHD in women/girls, long-term medication use, non-pharmacological interventions, ADHD measurement/rating scales, and efficacy of emotional regulation interventions. Conclusion: These results can inform an ADHD research agenda which represents the views of the individuals from major ADHD professional groups internationally. Parallel work is needed focusing on research priorities from the perspective of ADHD consumers.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2025
Accession Number: EJ1467372
Database: ERIC
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Be the first to leave a comment!
You must be logged in first