Scoring Difficulty in Summary Writing Assessment: Toward the Reconstruction of Analytic Rubric
Saved in:
| Title: | Scoring Difficulty in Summary Writing Assessment: Toward the Reconstruction of Analytic Rubric |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Makiko Kato |
| Source: | Journal of Education and Learning. 2025 14(2):74-88. |
| Availability: | Canadian Center of Science and Education. 1595 Sixteenth Ave Suite 301, Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3N9 Canada. Tel: 416-642-2606; Fax: 416-642-2608; e-mail: jel@ccsenet.org; Web site: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jel |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 15 |
| Publication Date: | 2025 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research Tests/Questionnaires |
| Education Level: | Higher Education Postsecondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Writing Evaluation, Scoring, Writing Skills, English (Second Language), Second Language Learning, College Students, Foreign Countries, Evaluators, Difficulty Level, Decision Making, Scoring Rubrics, College Faculty, Graduate Students, Student Attitudes, Teacher Attitudes |
| Geographic Terms: | Japan |
| ISSN: | 1927-5250 1927-5269 |
| Abstract: | This study aims to examine whether differences exist in the factors influencing the difficulty of scoring English summaries and determining scores based on the raters' attributes, and to collect candid opinions, considerations, and tentative suggestions for future improvements to the analytic rubric of summary writing for English learners. In this study, seven trained raters with diverse attribute backgrounds evaluated two kinds of English summaries written by Japanese university students using the analytic rubric with three evaluation items. A questionnaire was used to determine which of the three items were difficult to assess and why the raters perceived such difficulty, as well as what backgrounds and factors influenced their scoring decision-making. Moreover, through the raters' most recent experience, candid comments were collected for developing future rubrics. The results showed that whether the evaluators' attributes affected the difficulty of the evaluation was not clear. However, depending on the raters' experience in teaching English/assessing summary writing, requests for improvements in the descriptors of the evaluation items and in the rubric emerged. This study proposes a tentative analytic rubric for summary writing, providing a foundation for constructing a rubric that can be used more easily by future raters. It also highlights the opinions of expert and novice teachers conducting summary evaluations in education. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2025 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1469885 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1469885 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1469885 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Scoring Difficulty in Summary Writing Assessment: Toward the Reconstruction of Analytic Rubric – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Makiko+Kato%22">Makiko Kato</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Journal+of+Education+and+Learning%22"><i>Journal of Education and Learning</i></searchLink>. 2025 14(2):74-88. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Canadian Center of Science and Education. 1595 Sixteenth Ave Suite 301, Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3N9 Canada. Tel: 416-642-2606; Fax: 416-642-2608; e-mail: jel@ccsenet.org; Web site: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jel – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 15 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2025 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research<br />Tests/Questionnaires – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Writing+Evaluation%22">Writing Evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Scoring%22">Scoring</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Writing+Skills%22">Writing Skills</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22English+%28Second+Language%29%22">English (Second Language)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Second+Language+Learning%22">Second Language Learning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+Students%22">College Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Foreign+Countries%22">Foreign Countries</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evaluators%22">Evaluators</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Difficulty+Level%22">Difficulty Level</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Decision+Making%22">Decision Making</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Scoring+Rubrics%22">Scoring Rubrics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+Faculty%22">College Faculty</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Graduate+Students%22">Graduate Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Attitudes%22">Student Attitudes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teacher+Attitudes%22">Teacher Attitudes</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Japan%22">Japan</searchLink> – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 1927-5250<br />1927-5269 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: This study aims to examine whether differences exist in the factors influencing the difficulty of scoring English summaries and determining scores based on the raters' attributes, and to collect candid opinions, considerations, and tentative suggestions for future improvements to the analytic rubric of summary writing for English learners. In this study, seven trained raters with diverse attribute backgrounds evaluated two kinds of English summaries written by Japanese university students using the analytic rubric with three evaluation items. A questionnaire was used to determine which of the three items were difficult to assess and why the raters perceived such difficulty, as well as what backgrounds and factors influenced their scoring decision-making. Moreover, through the raters' most recent experience, candid comments were collected for developing future rubrics. The results showed that whether the evaluators' attributes affected the difficulty of the evaluation was not clear. However, depending on the raters' experience in teaching English/assessing summary writing, requests for improvements in the descriptors of the evaluation items and in the rubric emerged. This study proposes a tentative analytic rubric for summary writing, providing a foundation for constructing a rubric that can be used more easily by future raters. It also highlights the opinions of expert and novice teachers conducting summary evaluations in education. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2025 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1469885 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1469885 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 15 StartPage: 74 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Writing Evaluation Type: general – SubjectFull: Scoring Type: general – SubjectFull: Writing Skills Type: general – SubjectFull: English (Second Language) Type: general – SubjectFull: Second Language Learning Type: general – SubjectFull: College Students Type: general – SubjectFull: Foreign Countries Type: general – SubjectFull: Evaluators Type: general – SubjectFull: Difficulty Level Type: general – SubjectFull: Decision Making Type: general – SubjectFull: Scoring Rubrics Type: general – SubjectFull: College Faculty Type: general – SubjectFull: Graduate Students Type: general – SubjectFull: Student Attitudes Type: general – SubjectFull: Teacher Attitudes Type: general – SubjectFull: Japan Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Scoring Difficulty in Summary Writing Assessment: Toward the Reconstruction of Analytic Rubric Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Makiko Kato IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2025 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 1927-5250 – Type: issn-electronic Value: 1927-5269 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 14 – Type: issue Value: 2 Titles: – TitleFull: Journal of Education and Learning Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |