View in EDS

Collaborative Curricular (Re)Construction--Tracking Faculty and Student Learning Impacts and Outcomes Five Years Later

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Collaborative Curricular (Re)Construction--Tracking Faculty and Student Learning Impacts and Outcomes Five Years Later
Language: English
Authors: Gintaras K. Duda, Mary Ann Danielson
Source: International Journal for Students as Partners. 2018 2(2):39-52.
Availability: McMaster University Library Press. McMaster University Library, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON L8S $L6 Canada. e-mail: scom@mcmaster.ca; Web site: https://mulpress.mcmaster.ca/ijsap
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 14
Publication Date: 2018
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: Higher Education
Postsecondary Education
Descriptors: Curriculum Development, Partnerships in Education, College Students, College Faculty, Faculty Development, Student Development, Educational Environment, Student Attitudes, Teacher Attitudes, Outcomes of Education, Biology, Chemistry, Pharmacy, Science Curriculum
Abstract: The Collaborative Curricular (re)Construction, or C3, was an initiative at Creighton University that paired faculty (academics) and students in a process of backward course design, in two cohorts, in the 2013/14 and 2014/15 academic years. Faculty/student pairs worked over the span of a year to redesign a course within their discipline; courses ranged from theory-, skill-, and laboratory-based courses. The study investigated four primary questions: (1) Was C[superscript 3] an effective tool for faculty development?; (2) Did students emerge from the C3 experience changed as learners?; (3) Did the course revisions result in increased student learning in subsequent course offerings?; and (4) Did the effects of the C3 workgroup affect curriculum as well as the culture within the program or department? Previous work has described the immediate impact to faculty and student; here, however, findings include the long-term impact on faculty and on student learning in the redesigned courses. Results conclude that even a brief faculty/student collaborative redesign experience has lasting impacts on student learning and, in several cases, on program-wide curriculum.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2025
Accession Number: EJ1471787
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
CustomLinks:
  – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1471787
    Name: ERIC Full Text
    Category: fullText
    Text: Full Text from ERIC
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: EJ1471787
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Collaborative Curricular (Re)Construction--Tracking Faculty and Student Learning Impacts and Outcomes Five Years Later
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Gintaras+K%2E+Duda%22">Gintaras K. Duda</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Mary+Ann+Danielson%22">Mary Ann Danielson</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22International+Journal+for+Students+as+Partners%22"><i>International Journal for Students as Partners</i></searchLink>. 2018 2(2):39-52.
– Name: Avail
  Label: Availability
  Group: Avail
  Data: McMaster University Library Press. McMaster University Library, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON L8S $L6 Canada. e-mail: scom@mcmaster.ca; Web site: https://mulpress.mcmaster.ca/ijsap
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Y
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 14
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2018
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research
– Name: Audience
  Label: Education Level
  Group: Audnce
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Curriculum+Development%22">Curriculum Development</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Partnerships+in+Education%22">Partnerships in Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+Students%22">College Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+Faculty%22">College Faculty</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Faculty+Development%22">Faculty Development</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Development%22">Student Development</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Environment%22">Educational Environment</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Attitudes%22">Student Attitudes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teacher+Attitudes%22">Teacher Attitudes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Outcomes+of+Education%22">Outcomes of Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Biology%22">Biology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Chemistry%22">Chemistry</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Pharmacy%22">Pharmacy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Science+Curriculum%22">Science Curriculum</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: The Collaborative Curricular (re)Construction, or C3, was an initiative at Creighton University that paired faculty (academics) and students in a process of backward course design, in two cohorts, in the 2013/14 and 2014/15 academic years. Faculty/student pairs worked over the span of a year to redesign a course within their discipline; courses ranged from theory-, skill-, and laboratory-based courses. The study investigated four primary questions: (1) Was C[superscript 3] an effective tool for faculty development?; (2) Did students emerge from the C3 experience changed as learners?; (3) Did the course revisions result in increased student learning in subsequent course offerings?; and (4) Did the effects of the C3 workgroup affect curriculum as well as the culture within the program or department? Previous work has described the immediate impact to faculty and student; here, however, findings include the long-term impact on faculty and on student learning in the redesigned courses. Results conclude that even a brief faculty/student collaborative redesign experience has lasting impacts on student learning and, in several cases, on program-wide curriculum.
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: As Provided
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2025
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: EJ1471787
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1471787
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 14
        StartPage: 39
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Curriculum Development
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Partnerships in Education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: College Students
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: College Faculty
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Faculty Development
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Student Development
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Educational Environment
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Student Attitudes
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Teacher Attitudes
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Outcomes of Education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Biology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Chemistry
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Pharmacy
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Science Curriculum
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Collaborative Curricular (Re)Construction--Tracking Faculty and Student Learning Impacts and Outcomes Five Years Later
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Gintaras K. Duda
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Mary Ann Danielson
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 01
              Type: published
              Y: 2018
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 2
            – Type: issue
              Value: 2
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: International Journal for Students as Partners
              Type: main
ResultId 1