Identifying the Correlates of Individual, Peer and Systemic Advocacy among Parents of Children with Disabilities Who Are Interested in Civic Engagement

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Identifying the Correlates of Individual, Peer and Systemic Advocacy among Parents of Children with Disabilities Who Are Interested in Civic Engagement
Language: English
Authors: Meghan M. Burke (ORCID 0000-0001-5287-2351), Chak Li, Waifong Catherine Cheung, Amanda Johnston, Megan Best, Kelly Fulton, Abby Hardy, Zach Rossetti
Source: Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities. 2025 37(4):565-586.
Availability: Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 22
Publication Date: 2025
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Descriptors: Correlation, Advocacy, Parents, Parent Child Relationship, Disabilities, Parent Participation, Parent Attitudes, Children, Racial Differences, Empowerment, Motivation
DOI: 10.1007/s10882-024-09957-5
ISSN: 1056-263X
1573-3580
Abstract: Parent advocacy is often critical for families of individuals with disabilities. Prior research has suggested that parent advocacy occurs across three levels: individual, peer, and systemic. Yet, little empirical research has identified the correlates of advocacy for each level. For this study, we examined the survey responses of 246 parents of individuals with disabilities who were interested in participating in a legislative advocacy program. Analyses included hierarchical regressions to identify the correlates of individual, peer, and systemic advocacy. Parents of children with autism were significantly more likely to engage in individual advocacy. Parents who identified as Black (versus other racial groups) advocated significantly more on a systemic level. Further, malleable factors such as empowerment and motivation correlated positively with advocacy. Implications for research and practice are discussed.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2025
Accession Number: EJ1479103
Database: ERIC
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Be the first to leave a comment!
You must be logged in first