The Impact of Extensive Reading on Academic Writing Proficiency in EFL Undergraduate Students

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: The Impact of Extensive Reading on Academic Writing Proficiency in EFL Undergraduate Students
Language: English
Authors: Tamirat Taye, Gemechis Teshome
Source: Discover Education. 2025 4.
Availability: Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 20
Publication Date: 2025
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Tests/Questionnaires
Education Level: Higher Education
Postsecondary Education
Descriptors: Poetry, Writing Skills, Essays, Writing Evaluation, Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction, English (Second Language), Reading Strategies, Correlation, Reading Habits, Academic Language, Syntax, Undergraduate Students, Student Attitudes, Preferences, Literary Genres, Independent Reading, Reading Comprehension, Scores, Teacher Attitudes, Language Proficiency, Metacognition, Reading Writing Relationship
DOI: 10.1007/s44217-025-00679-0
ISSN: 2731-5525
Abstract: Extensive reading (ER) has the potential to enhance academic writing proficiency by supporting vocabulary growth, syntactic development, and organizational clarity. Despite its benefits, ER remains underutilized in many EFL contexts. This study investigates the impact of ER on the academic writing skills of 80 undergraduate students at Mizan Tepi University, selected through convenience sampling. Data were gathered through pre- and post-training comprehension tests, structured questionnaires on reading strategy preferences, essay analysis, and instructor interviews. A four-week ER program was implemented, engaging students with literary texts including short stories, novels, and poems to foster independent reading and comprehension. Quantitative data were analyzed using independent and paired sample t-tests and descriptive statistics. Results showed a moderate and statistically significant positive correlation between ER engagement and writing proficiency (r = 0.57, p < 0.001), with notable improvements in lexical diversity and argumentative coherence. Essay scores increased substantially: third-year students improved from 57.1 to 74.9, and fourth-year students from 59.5 to 78.5. Qualitative feedback from instructors highlighted ER's role in enhancing metacognitive awareness, facilitating the transfer of implicit to explicit knowledge, and improving overall coherence in student writing. However, challenges such as limited access to graded readers, weak institutional support, and inconsistent student motivation constrained its full effectiveness. This study underlines ER's dual function as a linguistic resource and cognitive scaffold. To maximize ER's pedagogical benefits, EFL curricula should incorporate structured reading programs, encourage guided reflection, and provide accessible reading materials; ensuring students develop both linguistic proficiency and critical thinking skills necessary for academic success.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2025
Accession Number: EJ1479161
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: EJ1479161
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: The Impact of Extensive Reading on Academic Writing Proficiency in EFL Undergraduate Students
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Tamirat+Taye%22&quot;&gt;Tamirat Taye&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Gemechis+Teshome%22&quot;&gt;Gemechis Teshome&lt;/searchLink&gt;
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;SO&quot; term=&quot;%22Discover+Education%22&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;Discover Education&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/searchLink&gt;. 2025 4.
– Name: Avail
  Label: Availability
  Group: Avail
  Data: Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Y
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 20
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2025
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Journal Articles&lt;br /&gt;Reports - Research&lt;br /&gt;Tests/Questionnaires
– Name: Audience
  Label: Education Level
  Group: Audnce
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;EL&quot; term=&quot;%22Higher+Education%22&quot;&gt;Higher Education&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;EL&quot; term=&quot;%22Postsecondary+Education%22&quot;&gt;Postsecondary Education&lt;/searchLink&gt;
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Poetry%22&quot;&gt;Poetry&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Writing+Skills%22&quot;&gt;Writing Skills&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Essays%22&quot;&gt;Essays&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Writing+Evaluation%22&quot;&gt;Writing Evaluation&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Second+Language+Learning%22&quot;&gt;Second Language Learning&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Second+Language+Instruction%22&quot;&gt;Second Language Instruction&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22English+%28Second+Language%29%22&quot;&gt;English (Second Language)&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Reading+Strategies%22&quot;&gt;Reading Strategies&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Correlation%22&quot;&gt;Correlation&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Reading+Habits%22&quot;&gt;Reading Habits&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Academic+Language%22&quot;&gt;Academic Language&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Syntax%22&quot;&gt;Syntax&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Undergraduate+Students%22&quot;&gt;Undergraduate Students&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Student+Attitudes%22&quot;&gt;Student Attitudes&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Preferences%22&quot;&gt;Preferences&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Literary+Genres%22&quot;&gt;Literary Genres&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Independent+Reading%22&quot;&gt;Independent Reading&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Reading+Comprehension%22&quot;&gt;Reading Comprehension&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Scores%22&quot;&gt;Scores&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Teacher+Attitudes%22&quot;&gt;Teacher Attitudes&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Language+Proficiency%22&quot;&gt;Language Proficiency&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Metacognition%22&quot;&gt;Metacognition&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Reading+Writing+Relationship%22&quot;&gt;Reading Writing Relationship&lt;/searchLink&gt;
– Name: DOI
  Label: DOI
  Group: ID
  Data: 10.1007/s44217-025-00679-0
– Name: ISSN
  Label: ISSN
  Group: ISSN
  Data: 2731-5525
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Extensive reading (ER) has the potential to enhance academic writing proficiency by supporting vocabulary growth, syntactic development, and organizational clarity. Despite its benefits, ER remains underutilized in many EFL contexts. This study investigates the impact of ER on the academic writing skills of 80 undergraduate students at Mizan Tepi University, selected through convenience sampling. Data were gathered through pre- and post-training comprehension tests, structured questionnaires on reading strategy preferences, essay analysis, and instructor interviews. A four-week ER program was implemented, engaging students with literary texts including short stories, novels, and poems to foster independent reading and comprehension. Quantitative data were analyzed using independent and paired sample t-tests and descriptive statistics. Results showed a moderate and statistically significant positive correlation between ER engagement and writing proficiency (r = 0.57, p &lt; 0.001), with notable improvements in lexical diversity and argumentative coherence. Essay scores increased substantially: third-year students improved from 57.1 to 74.9, and fourth-year students from 59.5 to 78.5. Qualitative feedback from instructors highlighted ER&#39;s role in enhancing metacognitive awareness, facilitating the transfer of implicit to explicit knowledge, and improving overall coherence in student writing. However, challenges such as limited access to graded readers, weak institutional support, and inconsistent student motivation constrained its full effectiveness. This study underlines ER&#39;s dual function as a linguistic resource and cognitive scaffold. To maximize ER&#39;s pedagogical benefits, EFL curricula should incorporate structured reading programs, encourage guided reflection, and provide accessible reading materials; ensuring students develop both linguistic proficiency and critical thinking skills necessary for academic success.
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: As Provided
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2025
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: EJ1479161
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1479161
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1007/s44217-025-00679-0
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 20
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Poetry
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Writing Skills
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Essays
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Writing Evaluation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Second Language Learning
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Second Language Instruction
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: English (Second Language)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Reading Strategies
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Correlation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Reading Habits
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Academic Language
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Syntax
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Undergraduate Students
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Student Attitudes
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Preferences
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Literary Genres
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Independent Reading
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Reading Comprehension
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Scores
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Teacher Attitudes
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Language Proficiency
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Metacognition
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Reading Writing Relationship
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: The Impact of Extensive Reading on Academic Writing Proficiency in EFL Undergraduate Students
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Tamirat Taye
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Gemechis Teshome
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 12
              Type: published
              Y: 2025
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-electronic
              Value: 2731-5525
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 4
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Discover Education
              Type: main
ResultId 1