Promoting Teaching-Focused Faculty in Biomedical Engineering: Education Summit Highlights Best Practices for Professional Development
Saved in:
| Title: | Promoting Teaching-Focused Faculty in Biomedical Engineering: Education Summit Highlights Best Practices for Professional Development |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Jennifer R. Amos (ORCID |
| Source: | Biomedical Engineering Education. 2025 5(2):169-176. |
| Availability: | Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/ |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 8 |
| Publication Date: | 2025 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Higher Education Postsecondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Teacher Promotion, Biomedicine, Engineering, Faculty Development, College Faculty, Employment Practices, Mentors, Teacher Attitudes, Administrative Policy, Personnel Policy, Community Attitudes |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s43683-025-00172-y |
| ISSN: | 2730-5937 2730-5945 |
| Abstract: | Promoting teaching-focused faculty to higher ranks presents a unique set of challenges that arise from the traditional focus on research within academia and the evolving demands of academia. Understanding these challenges is essential to developing policies and practices that ensure the advancement of teaching-focused faculty while maintaining the high standards required in biomedical engineering. This paper brings together literature findings and insights gained from the biomedical engineering faculty community to prepare a set of recommendations for the community to foster professional development and set clear pathways to promote faculty who serve in these roles. The paper combines literature findings with findings from the BME community taken from a session entitled, "Promoting instructional and tenure track faculty success, professional training, and individual mentorship," which was part of the 2024 BME Education Summit hosted by the Council of Chairs. Topics that emerged from the discussion included challenges due to vague promotional criteria, evolving educational needs and invisible labor, lack of professional development, and lack of standardized promotion processes and pathways. These themes are supported in literature for fields outside of biomedical engineering. Discussion from the community underscores that teaching-focused faculty play a crucial role in biomedical engineering departments at research-intensive universities by enhancing the educational mission while promoting a positive culture around learning and student development. Our paper makes several recommendations for the BME/BioE Council of Chairs and ASEE Engineering Deans Institute for future work in this area that will be essential to grow the BME teaching faculty community and promote this specialized group of faculty to advance our field. The involvement and advocacy of campus leadership is critical in order to bring attention to these topics and change current policies. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2025 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1482426 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1482426 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Promoting Teaching-Focused Faculty in Biomedical Engineering: Education Summit Highlights Best Practices for Professional Development – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Jennifer+R%2E+Amos%22">Jennifer R. Amos</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9437-8201">0000-0002-9437-8201</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Brenda+M%2E+Ogle%22">Brenda M. Ogle</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Julie+M%2E+Hasenwinkel%22">Julie M. Hasenwinkel</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Biomedical+Engineering+Education%22"><i>Biomedical Engineering Education</i></searchLink>. 2025 5(2):169-176. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/ – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 8 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2025 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teacher+Promotion%22">Teacher Promotion</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Biomedicine%22">Biomedicine</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Engineering%22">Engineering</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Faculty+Development%22">Faculty Development</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+Faculty%22">College Faculty</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Employment+Practices%22">Employment Practices</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mentors%22">Mentors</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teacher+Attitudes%22">Teacher Attitudes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Administrative+Policy%22">Administrative Policy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Personnel+Policy%22">Personnel Policy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Community+Attitudes%22">Community Attitudes</searchLink> – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1007/s43683-025-00172-y – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 2730-5937<br />2730-5945 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Promoting teaching-focused faculty to higher ranks presents a unique set of challenges that arise from the traditional focus on research within academia and the evolving demands of academia. Understanding these challenges is essential to developing policies and practices that ensure the advancement of teaching-focused faculty while maintaining the high standards required in biomedical engineering. This paper brings together literature findings and insights gained from the biomedical engineering faculty community to prepare a set of recommendations for the community to foster professional development and set clear pathways to promote faculty who serve in these roles. The paper combines literature findings with findings from the BME community taken from a session entitled, "Promoting instructional and tenure track faculty success, professional training, and individual mentorship," which was part of the 2024 BME Education Summit hosted by the Council of Chairs. Topics that emerged from the discussion included challenges due to vague promotional criteria, evolving educational needs and invisible labor, lack of professional development, and lack of standardized promotion processes and pathways. These themes are supported in literature for fields outside of biomedical engineering. Discussion from the community underscores that teaching-focused faculty play a crucial role in biomedical engineering departments at research-intensive universities by enhancing the educational mission while promoting a positive culture around learning and student development. Our paper makes several recommendations for the BME/BioE Council of Chairs and ASEE Engineering Deans Institute for future work in this area that will be essential to grow the BME teaching faculty community and promote this specialized group of faculty to advance our field. The involvement and advocacy of campus leadership is critical in order to bring attention to these topics and change current policies. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2025 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1482426 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1482426 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1007/s43683-025-00172-y Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 8 StartPage: 169 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Teacher Promotion Type: general – SubjectFull: Biomedicine Type: general – SubjectFull: Engineering Type: general – SubjectFull: Faculty Development Type: general – SubjectFull: College Faculty Type: general – SubjectFull: Employment Practices Type: general – SubjectFull: Mentors Type: general – SubjectFull: Teacher Attitudes Type: general – SubjectFull: Administrative Policy Type: general – SubjectFull: Personnel Policy Type: general – SubjectFull: Community Attitudes Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Promoting Teaching-Focused Faculty in Biomedical Engineering: Education Summit Highlights Best Practices for Professional Development Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Jennifer R. Amos – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Brenda M. Ogle – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Julie M. Hasenwinkel IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 07 Type: published Y: 2025 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 2730-5937 – Type: issn-electronic Value: 2730-5945 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 5 – Type: issue Value: 2 Titles: – TitleFull: Biomedical Engineering Education Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |