Estimating the Effect of Structured Vocabulary Review: An Experimental Evaluation
Saved in:
| Title: | Estimating the Effect of Structured Vocabulary Review: An Experimental Evaluation |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Joshua Fahey Lawrence, Emily Phillips Galloway, Judy Yu-Li Hsu |
| Source: | Elementary School Journal. 2025 126(1):82-106. |
| Availability: | University of Chicago Press. Journals Division, P.O. Box 37005, Chicago, IL 60637. Tel: 877-705-1878; Tel: 773-753-3347; Fax: 877-705-1879; Fax: 773-753-0811; e-mail: subscriptions@press.uchicago.edu; Web site: http://www.press.uchicago.edu |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 25 |
| Publication Date: | 2025 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Junior High Schools Middle Schools Secondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Vocabulary Development, Language Acquisition, Middle School Students, Academic Language, Reading Comprehension, Retention (Psychology), Receptive Language, Language Usage, Semantics |
| DOI: | 10.1086/736758 |
| ISSN: | 0013-5984 1554-8279 |
| Abstract: | This study investigates the impact of structured vocabulary review on vocabulary acquisition among middle-grade students (grades 6-8) using an experimental, parallel design. Twenty-four classrooms (310 students) were randomly assigned to review different sets of academic vocabulary. Students completed 20 weeks of the Word Generation curriculum, followed by a structured, three-day vocabulary review. Prior research indicates that vocabulary knowledge significantly influences reading comprehension, but single exposures to academic vocabulary typically do not lead to lasting retention. Structured vocabulary review provides repeated encounters with target words through reading, discussion, and interactive activities, supporting both receptive and productive vocabulary use. Generalized linear mixed models revealed that structured review increased the odds of correctly answering reviewed vocabulary items at posttest by 40%. A secondary analysis suggested a potential interaction between semantic diversity of words and treatment effects, though further exploration is required. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2025 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1484192 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1484192 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Estimating the Effect of Structured Vocabulary Review: An Experimental Evaluation – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Joshua+Fahey+Lawrence%22">Joshua Fahey Lawrence</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Emily+Phillips+Galloway%22">Emily Phillips Galloway</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Judy+Yu-Li+Hsu%22">Judy Yu-Li Hsu</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Elementary+School+Journal%22"><i>Elementary School Journal</i></searchLink>. 2025 126(1):82-106. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: University of Chicago Press. Journals Division, P.O. Box 37005, Chicago, IL 60637. Tel: 877-705-1878; Tel: 773-753-3347; Fax: 877-705-1879; Fax: 773-753-0811; e-mail: subscriptions@press.uchicago.edu; Web site: http://www.press.uchicago.edu – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 25 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2025 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Junior+High+Schools%22">Junior High Schools</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Middle+Schools%22">Middle Schools</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Secondary+Education%22">Secondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Vocabulary+Development%22">Vocabulary Development</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Language+Acquisition%22">Language Acquisition</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Middle+School+Students%22">Middle School Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Academic+Language%22">Academic Language</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Reading+Comprehension%22">Reading Comprehension</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Retention+%28Psychology%29%22">Retention (Psychology)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Receptive+Language%22">Receptive Language</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Language+Usage%22">Language Usage</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Semantics%22">Semantics</searchLink> – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1086/736758 – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 0013-5984<br />1554-8279 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: This study investigates the impact of structured vocabulary review on vocabulary acquisition among middle-grade students (grades 6-8) using an experimental, parallel design. Twenty-four classrooms (310 students) were randomly assigned to review different sets of academic vocabulary. Students completed 20 weeks of the Word Generation curriculum, followed by a structured, three-day vocabulary review. Prior research indicates that vocabulary knowledge significantly influences reading comprehension, but single exposures to academic vocabulary typically do not lead to lasting retention. Structured vocabulary review provides repeated encounters with target words through reading, discussion, and interactive activities, supporting both receptive and productive vocabulary use. Generalized linear mixed models revealed that structured review increased the odds of correctly answering reviewed vocabulary items at posttest by 40%. A secondary analysis suggested a potential interaction between semantic diversity of words and treatment effects, though further exploration is required. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2025 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1484192 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1484192 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1086/736758 Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 25 StartPage: 82 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Vocabulary Development Type: general – SubjectFull: Language Acquisition Type: general – SubjectFull: Middle School Students Type: general – SubjectFull: Academic Language Type: general – SubjectFull: Reading Comprehension Type: general – SubjectFull: Retention (Psychology) Type: general – SubjectFull: Receptive Language Type: general – SubjectFull: Language Usage Type: general – SubjectFull: Semantics Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Estimating the Effect of Structured Vocabulary Review: An Experimental Evaluation Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Joshua Fahey Lawrence – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Emily Phillips Galloway – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Judy Yu-Li Hsu IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2025 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 0013-5984 – Type: issn-electronic Value: 1554-8279 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 126 – Type: issue Value: 1 Titles: – TitleFull: Elementary School Journal Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |