When Money Matters Most: Unpacking the Effectiveness of School Spending

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: When Money Matters Most: Unpacking the Effectiveness of School Spending
Language: English
Authors: Emily Rauscher (ORCID 0000-0002-5384-4667), Greer Mellon (ORCID 0000-0002-4147-4507), Susanna Loeb, Carolyn Abott
Source: Sociology of Education. 2025 98(4):314-336.
Availability: SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: https://sagepub.com
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 23
Publication Date: 2025
Sponsoring Agency: National Institutes of Health (NIH) (DHHS)
Contract Number: P2CHD041020
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Descriptors: Educational Finance, Expenditures, School Districts, Elections, Bond Issues, Taxes, Equal Education, Academic Achievement, Race, Ethnicity, Low Income Students, Disadvantaged Schools, African American Students, Hispanic American Students, White Students, Institutional Characteristics
Geographic Terms: Arkansas, California, Louisiana, Michigan, Missouri, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Texas, Wisconsin, Iowa, Oklahoma
DOI: 10.1177/00380407251349165
ISSN: 0038-0407
1939-8573
Abstract: Targeted school funding is a potentially valuable policy lever to increase educational equality by race, ethnicity, and income, but it remains unclear how to target funds most effectively. We use a regression discontinuity approach to compare districts that narrowly passed or failed a school funding election. We use close tax elections in nine states to identify effects of operating funds, and we use close bond elections in eight states to identify effects of capital funds. Results indicate positive achievement returns to spending, especially for math achievement. We find similar returns to spending by student race, ethnicity, and income (not statistically different), but we find significantly larger returns for students in low-spending and high-poverty districts than in more advantaged districts. Targeted spending to low-resource districts is more effective and can reduce inequality. Mediation analyses suggest spending on teacher salaries and counselors may be particularly effective mechanisms to increase achievement among Black and low-income students.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2025
Accession Number: EJ1485621
Database: ERIC
Description
Abstract:Targeted school funding is a potentially valuable policy lever to increase educational equality by race, ethnicity, and income, but it remains unclear how to target funds most effectively. We use a regression discontinuity approach to compare districts that narrowly passed or failed a school funding election. We use close tax elections in nine states to identify effects of operating funds, and we use close bond elections in eight states to identify effects of capital funds. Results indicate positive achievement returns to spending, especially for math achievement. We find similar returns to spending by student race, ethnicity, and income (not statistically different), but we find significantly larger returns for students in low-spending and high-poverty districts than in more advantaged districts. Targeted spending to low-resource districts is more effective and can reduce inequality. Mediation analyses suggest spending on teacher salaries and counselors may be particularly effective mechanisms to increase achievement among Black and low-income students.
ISSN:0038-0407
1939-8573
DOI:10.1177/00380407251349165