The Positioning of Quality and Expertise in Initial Teacher Education: Policy Enactment in the Australian Context
Saved in:
| Title: | The Positioning of Quality and Expertise in Initial Teacher Education: Policy Enactment in the Australian Context |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Mary Ryan (ORCID |
| Source: | Australian Educational Researcher. 2025 52(3):1997-2020. |
| Availability: | Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/ |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 24 |
| Publication Date: | 2025 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Higher Education Postsecondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Educational Quality, Expertise, Preservice Teacher Education, Educational Policy, Foreign Countries, Teacher Effectiveness, Educational Improvement, Educational Change, Stakeholders |
| Geographic Terms: | Australia |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s13384-024-00796-z |
| ISSN: | 0311-6999 2210-5328 |
| Abstract: | Teacher quality and teacher education improvement have been central discourses for at least two decades in global education. In Australia, despite the pervasive nature of these discussions, there is a lack of substantial evidence indicating the existence of a problem in this regard. Policies aimed at enhancing the 'preparedness' of teacher graduates and elevating the 'quality' of ITE programs have nonetheless emerged as prevalent solutions over the past decade. The latest enactment of reforms in the policy chain is the "Strong Beginnings" report from the Teacher Education Expert Panel. In this paper, we align with Ball's perspective that policy should be viewed as a dynamic process rather than a presumed, ready-made solution to a problem. We utilise systematic conceptual coding using Leximancer to enable a nuanced exploration of the understandings, practices, and conditions of influence for the policy actors inscribed in the TEEP report. We also analyse concept frequency and collocation in the final Strong Beginnings report, noting two main propositions: first, that there is a problem with quality in ITE; and second, that practice is foregrounded in professionalisation. We highlight the consistencies and contradictions within the discourses of the final report and the submissions from policy actors that contributed to this policy enactment process. We suggest that evidence is used when it suits a policy position, but ignored if it disrupts the platform position. We conclude by arguing that the policy actors in this policy enactment process should be afforded the professional authority to continue a well-established process of continual improvement. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2025 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1487852 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1487852 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: The Positioning of Quality and Expertise in Initial Teacher Education: Policy Enactment in the Australian Context – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Mary+Ryan%22">Mary Ryan</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2237-9368">0000-0003-2237-9368</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Penny+Van+Bergen%22">Penny Van Bergen</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9542-812X">0000-0001-9542-812X</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Rachael+Adlington%22">Rachael Adlington</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8696-2347">0000-0001-8696-2347</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Olivia+Maurice%22">Olivia Maurice</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4540-9868">0000-0002-4540-9868</externalLink>) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Australian+Educational+Researcher%22"><i>Australian Educational Researcher</i></searchLink>. 2025 52(3):1997-2020. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/ – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 24 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2025 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Quality%22">Educational Quality</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Expertise%22">Expertise</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Preservice+Teacher+Education%22">Preservice Teacher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Policy%22">Educational Policy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Foreign+Countries%22">Foreign Countries</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teacher+Effectiveness%22">Teacher Effectiveness</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Improvement%22">Educational Improvement</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Change%22">Educational Change</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Stakeholders%22">Stakeholders</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Australia%22">Australia</searchLink> – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1007/s13384-024-00796-z – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 0311-6999<br />2210-5328 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Teacher quality and teacher education improvement have been central discourses for at least two decades in global education. In Australia, despite the pervasive nature of these discussions, there is a lack of substantial evidence indicating the existence of a problem in this regard. Policies aimed at enhancing the 'preparedness' of teacher graduates and elevating the 'quality' of ITE programs have nonetheless emerged as prevalent solutions over the past decade. The latest enactment of reforms in the policy chain is the "Strong Beginnings" report from the Teacher Education Expert Panel. In this paper, we align with Ball's perspective that policy should be viewed as a dynamic process rather than a presumed, ready-made solution to a problem. We utilise systematic conceptual coding using Leximancer to enable a nuanced exploration of the understandings, practices, and conditions of influence for the policy actors inscribed in the TEEP report. We also analyse concept frequency and collocation in the final Strong Beginnings report, noting two main propositions: first, that there is a problem with quality in ITE; and second, that practice is foregrounded in professionalisation. We highlight the consistencies and contradictions within the discourses of the final report and the submissions from policy actors that contributed to this policy enactment process. We suggest that evidence is used when it suits a policy position, but ignored if it disrupts the platform position. We conclude by arguing that the policy actors in this policy enactment process should be afforded the professional authority to continue a well-established process of continual improvement. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2025 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1487852 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1487852 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1007/s13384-024-00796-z Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 24 StartPage: 1997 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Educational Quality Type: general – SubjectFull: Expertise Type: general – SubjectFull: Preservice Teacher Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational Policy Type: general – SubjectFull: Foreign Countries Type: general – SubjectFull: Teacher Effectiveness Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational Improvement Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational Change Type: general – SubjectFull: Stakeholders Type: general – SubjectFull: Australia Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: The Positioning of Quality and Expertise in Initial Teacher Education: Policy Enactment in the Australian Context Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Mary Ryan – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Penny Van Bergen – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Rachael Adlington – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Olivia Maurice IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2025 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 0311-6999 – Type: issn-electronic Value: 2210-5328 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 52 – Type: issue Value: 3 Titles: – TitleFull: Australian Educational Researcher Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |