The Positioning of Quality and Expertise in Initial Teacher Education: Policy Enactment in the Australian Context

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: The Positioning of Quality and Expertise in Initial Teacher Education: Policy Enactment in the Australian Context
Language: English
Authors: Mary Ryan (ORCID 0000-0003-2237-9368), Penny Van Bergen (ORCID 0000-0001-9542-812X), Rachael Adlington (ORCID 0000-0001-8696-2347), Olivia Maurice (ORCID 0000-0002-4540-9868)
Source: Australian Educational Researcher. 2025 52(3):1997-2020.
Availability: Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 24
Publication Date: 2025
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: Higher Education
Postsecondary Education
Descriptors: Educational Quality, Expertise, Preservice Teacher Education, Educational Policy, Foreign Countries, Teacher Effectiveness, Educational Improvement, Educational Change, Stakeholders
Geographic Terms: Australia
DOI: 10.1007/s13384-024-00796-z
ISSN: 0311-6999
2210-5328
Abstract: Teacher quality and teacher education improvement have been central discourses for at least two decades in global education. In Australia, despite the pervasive nature of these discussions, there is a lack of substantial evidence indicating the existence of a problem in this regard. Policies aimed at enhancing the 'preparedness' of teacher graduates and elevating the 'quality' of ITE programs have nonetheless emerged as prevalent solutions over the past decade. The latest enactment of reforms in the policy chain is the "Strong Beginnings" report from the Teacher Education Expert Panel. In this paper, we align with Ball's perspective that policy should be viewed as a dynamic process rather than a presumed, ready-made solution to a problem. We utilise systematic conceptual coding using Leximancer to enable a nuanced exploration of the understandings, practices, and conditions of influence for the policy actors inscribed in the TEEP report. We also analyse concept frequency and collocation in the final Strong Beginnings report, noting two main propositions: first, that there is a problem with quality in ITE; and second, that practice is foregrounded in professionalisation. We highlight the consistencies and contradictions within the discourses of the final report and the submissions from policy actors that contributed to this policy enactment process. We suggest that evidence is used when it suits a policy position, but ignored if it disrupts the platform position. We conclude by arguing that the policy actors in this policy enactment process should be afforded the professional authority to continue a well-established process of continual improvement.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2025
Accession Number: EJ1487852
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: EJ1487852
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: The Positioning of Quality and Expertise in Initial Teacher Education: Policy Enactment in the Australian Context
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Mary+Ryan%22">Mary Ryan</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2237-9368">0000-0003-2237-9368</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Penny+Van+Bergen%22">Penny Van Bergen</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9542-812X">0000-0001-9542-812X</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Rachael+Adlington%22">Rachael Adlington</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8696-2347">0000-0001-8696-2347</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Olivia+Maurice%22">Olivia Maurice</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4540-9868">0000-0002-4540-9868</externalLink>)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Australian+Educational+Researcher%22"><i>Australian Educational Researcher</i></searchLink>. 2025 52(3):1997-2020.
– Name: Avail
  Label: Availability
  Group: Avail
  Data: Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Y
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 24
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2025
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research
– Name: Audience
  Label: Education Level
  Group: Audnce
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Quality%22">Educational Quality</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Expertise%22">Expertise</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Preservice+Teacher+Education%22">Preservice Teacher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Policy%22">Educational Policy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Foreign+Countries%22">Foreign Countries</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teacher+Effectiveness%22">Teacher Effectiveness</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Improvement%22">Educational Improvement</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Change%22">Educational Change</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Stakeholders%22">Stakeholders</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Australia%22">Australia</searchLink>
– Name: DOI
  Label: DOI
  Group: ID
  Data: 10.1007/s13384-024-00796-z
– Name: ISSN
  Label: ISSN
  Group: ISSN
  Data: 0311-6999<br />2210-5328
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Teacher quality and teacher education improvement have been central discourses for at least two decades in global education. In Australia, despite the pervasive nature of these discussions, there is a lack of substantial evidence indicating the existence of a problem in this regard. Policies aimed at enhancing the 'preparedness' of teacher graduates and elevating the 'quality' of ITE programs have nonetheless emerged as prevalent solutions over the past decade. The latest enactment of reforms in the policy chain is the "Strong Beginnings" report from the Teacher Education Expert Panel. In this paper, we align with Ball's perspective that policy should be viewed as a dynamic process rather than a presumed, ready-made solution to a problem. We utilise systematic conceptual coding using Leximancer to enable a nuanced exploration of the understandings, practices, and conditions of influence for the policy actors inscribed in the TEEP report. We also analyse concept frequency and collocation in the final Strong Beginnings report, noting two main propositions: first, that there is a problem with quality in ITE; and second, that practice is foregrounded in professionalisation. We highlight the consistencies and contradictions within the discourses of the final report and the submissions from policy actors that contributed to this policy enactment process. We suggest that evidence is used when it suits a policy position, but ignored if it disrupts the platform position. We conclude by arguing that the policy actors in this policy enactment process should be afforded the professional authority to continue a well-established process of continual improvement.
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: As Provided
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2025
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: EJ1487852
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1487852
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1007/s13384-024-00796-z
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 24
        StartPage: 1997
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Educational Quality
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Expertise
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Preservice Teacher Education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Educational Policy
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Foreign Countries
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Teacher Effectiveness
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Educational Improvement
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Educational Change
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Stakeholders
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Australia
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: The Positioning of Quality and Expertise in Initial Teacher Education: Policy Enactment in the Australian Context
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Mary Ryan
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Penny Van Bergen
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Rachael Adlington
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Olivia Maurice
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 01
              Type: published
              Y: 2025
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 0311-6999
            – Type: issn-electronic
              Value: 2210-5328
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 52
            – Type: issue
              Value: 3
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Australian Educational Researcher
              Type: main
ResultId 1