How Do Different Forms of Note-Taking Affect Second Language Vocabulary Learning?
Saved in:
| Title: | How Do Different Forms of Note-Taking Affect Second Language Vocabulary Learning? |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Zhouhan Jin (ORCID |
| Source: | Language Learning. 2025 75(4):1185-1221. |
| Availability: | Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www.wiley.com/en-us |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 37 |
| Publication Date: | 2025 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Descriptors: | Notetaking, Second Language Learning, Vocabulary Development, Recall (Psychology), English (Second Language), Foreign Countries, Writing (Composition), Prior Learning, Lecture Method |
| Geographic Terms: | China |
| DOI: | 10.1111/lang.12705 |
| ISSN: | 0023-8333 1467-9922 |
| Abstract: | The present study compared learning gains at both form recall and meaning recall levels across three learning conditions: viewing without note-taking, viewing with conventional note-taking, and viewing with guided note-taking. A total of 134 Chinese learners of English were assigned to three experimental groups and a no-treatment control group. Results showed that (a) guided note-taking contributed to greater vocabulary learning than conventional note-taking on the form recall test, (b) both guided and conventional note-taking contributed to significant vocabulary gains on the meaning recall test, and (c) viewing without note-taking did not contribute to significant learning gains. The analyses also revealed that writing unknown words in notes, the inclusion of target words in the lecture slides, and learners' prior vocabulary knowledge affected learning, but frequency of occurrence, word length, and learners' level of viewing comprehension did not. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Notes: | https://osf.io/bsnkg |
| Entry Date: | 2025 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1489346 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1489346 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: How Do Different Forms of Note-Taking Affect Second Language Vocabulary Learning? – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Zhouhan+Jin%22">Zhouhan Jin</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5285-9384">0000-0001-5285-9384</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Stuart+Webb%22">Stuart Webb</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8297-4997">0000-0002-8297-4997</externalLink>) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Language+Learning%22"><i>Language Learning</i></searchLink>. 2025 75(4):1185-1221. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www.wiley.com/en-us – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 37 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2025 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Notetaking%22">Notetaking</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Second+Language+Learning%22">Second Language Learning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Vocabulary+Development%22">Vocabulary Development</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Recall+%28Psychology%29%22">Recall (Psychology)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22English+%28Second+Language%29%22">English (Second Language)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Foreign+Countries%22">Foreign Countries</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Writing+%28Composition%29%22">Writing (Composition)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Prior+Learning%22">Prior Learning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Lecture+Method%22">Lecture Method</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22China%22">China</searchLink> – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1111/lang.12705 – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 0023-8333<br />1467-9922 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: The present study compared learning gains at both form recall and meaning recall levels across three learning conditions: viewing without note-taking, viewing with conventional note-taking, and viewing with guided note-taking. A total of 134 Chinese learners of English were assigned to three experimental groups and a no-treatment control group. Results showed that (a) guided note-taking contributed to greater vocabulary learning than conventional note-taking on the form recall test, (b) both guided and conventional note-taking contributed to significant vocabulary gains on the meaning recall test, and (c) viewing without note-taking did not contribute to significant learning gains. The analyses also revealed that writing unknown words in notes, the inclusion of target words in the lecture slides, and learners' prior vocabulary knowledge affected learning, but frequency of occurrence, word length, and learners' level of viewing comprehension did not. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: Note Label: Notes Group: Note Data: https://osf.io/bsnkg – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2025 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1489346 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1489346 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1111/lang.12705 Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 37 StartPage: 1185 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Notetaking Type: general – SubjectFull: Second Language Learning Type: general – SubjectFull: Vocabulary Development Type: general – SubjectFull: Recall (Psychology) Type: general – SubjectFull: English (Second Language) Type: general – SubjectFull: Foreign Countries Type: general – SubjectFull: Writing (Composition) Type: general – SubjectFull: Prior Learning Type: general – SubjectFull: Lecture Method Type: general – SubjectFull: China Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: How Do Different Forms of Note-Taking Affect Second Language Vocabulary Learning? Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Zhouhan Jin – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Stuart Webb IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 12 Type: published Y: 2025 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 0023-8333 – Type: issn-electronic Value: 1467-9922 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 75 – Type: issue Value: 4 Titles: – TitleFull: Language Learning Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |