Unraveling Factors Affecting Engineering Students' Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence in the Context of a Blended Learning Environment

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Unraveling Factors Affecting Engineering Students' Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence in the Context of a Blended Learning Environment
Language: English
Authors: Muh. Hamkah, Heri Retnawati, Muthmainah Muthmainah, Muhammad Hakiki, Mustofa Abi Hamid, Hasruddin Hasruddin, M. Dahlan, M. Agphin Ramadhan, Muhammad Nurtanto, Indra Mutiara
Source: Online Learning. 2025 29(4):560-594.
Availability: Online Learning Consortium, Inc. P.O. Box 1238, Newburyport, MA 01950. Tel: 888-898-6209; Fax: 888-898-6209; e-mail: olj@onlinelearning-c.org; Web site: https://olj.onlinelearningconsortium.org/index.php/olj/index
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 35
Publication Date: 2025
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: Higher Education
Postsecondary Education
Descriptors: Online Courses, Artificial Intelligence, Engineering Education, College Students, Student Attitudes, Blended Learning, Value Judgment, Usability, Social Influences, Affordances, Self Efficacy, Barriers, Risk, Foreign Countries, Student Characteristics
Geographic Terms: Indonesia
ISSN: 2472-5749
2472-5730
Abstract: The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) has significantly transformed various educational domains, including engineering education. Despite AI's growing prevalence, limited research has explored the determinants influencing engineering students' acceptance of AI. This study investigates the factors shaping AI acceptance among engineering students in Indonesia. Using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) with the Partial Least Squares (PLS) approach, data were collected from 158 engineering students across multiple universities. The research model incorporates six constructs: Perceived Usefulness (PU), Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU), Social Influence (SI), Facilitating Conditions (FC), Self-Efficacy (SE), and Perceived Risks (PR), each operationalized through seven measurement indicators. The results indicate that PU, PEOU, SI, and SE have significant positive effects on AI acceptance, while PR exerts a significant negative influence. Conversely, FC does not demonstrate a significant impact. These findings offer theoretical and practical implications for fostering AI adoption in engineering education, including strategies for educators, policymakers, and developers of AI-based tools to enhance user acceptance. This study extends the literature on technology acceptance in educational settings, providing actionable insights for improving the integration of AI in higher education.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2025
Accession Number: EJ1490587
Database: ERIC
Be the first to leave a comment!
You must be logged in first