What Students Really Think: Unpacking AI Ethics in Educational Assessments through a Triadic Framework
Saved in:
| Title: | What Students Really Think: Unpacking AI Ethics in Educational Assessments through a Triadic Framework |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Tristan Lim (ORCID |
| Source: | International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. 2025 22. |
| Availability: | BioMed Central, Ltd. Available from: Springer Nature. 233 Spring Street, New York, NY 10013. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-348-4505; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://www.springer.com/gp/biomedical-sciences |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 32 |
| Publication Date: | 2025 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research Tests/Questionnaires |
| Descriptors: | Student Attitudes, Artificial Intelligence, Technology Uses in Education, Ethics, Educational Assessment, Efficiency, Design, Grading, Accountability, Privacy, Integrity, Responsibility |
| DOI: | 10.1186/s41239-025-00556-8 |
| ISSN: | 2365-9440 |
| Abstract: | The rise of AI in educational assessments has significantly enhanced efficiency and accuracy. However, it also introduces critical ethical challenges, including bias in grading, data privacy risks, and accountability gaps. These issues can undermine trust in AI-driven assessments and compromise educational fairness, making a structured ethical framework essential. To address these challenges, this study empirically validates an existing triadic ethical framework for AI-assisted educational assessments, originally proposed by Lim, Gottipati and Cheong (In: Keengwe (ed) Creative AI tools and ethical implications in teaching and learning, IGI Global, 2023), grounded in student perceptions. The framework encompasses three ethical domains--physical, cognitive, and informational--which intersect with five key assessment pipeline stages: system design, data stewardship, assessment construction, administration, and grading. By structuring AI-driven assessments within this ethical framework, the study systematically maps key concerns, including fairness, accountability, privacy, and academic integrity. To validate the proposed framework, Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) was employed to examine its relevance and alignment with learners' ethical concerns. Specifically, the study aims to (1) evaluate how well the triadic framework aligns with learners' perceptions of ethical issues using SEM analysis, and (2) examine relationships among the assessment pipeline stages, ethical considerations, pedagogical outcomes, and learner experiences. Findings reveal robust connections between AI-assisted assessment stages, ethical concerns, and learners' perspectives. By bridging theoretical validation with practical insights, this study emphasizes actionable strategies to support the development of AI-driven assessment systems that balance technological efficiency, pedagogical effectiveness, and ethical responsibility. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2026 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1491149 |
| Database: | ERIC |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
Be the first to leave a comment!
