View in EDS

AI in the Hands of Students: How Undergraduate Use and Perceive Generative Tools

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: AI in the Hands of Students: How Undergraduate Use and Perceive Generative Tools
Language: English
Authors: Smita Jadhav (ORCID 0009-0006-1851-2284)
Source: International Journal on Social and Education Sciences. 2026 8(1):115-128.
Availability: International Society for Technology, Education, and Science. ISTES Organization, Monument, CO 80132. e-mail: istesorganization@gmail.com; e-mail: ijonsesoffice@gmail.com; Web site: https://www.ijonses.net/index.php/ijonses
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 14
Publication Date: 2026
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Tests/Questionnaires
Education Level: Higher Education
Postsecondary Education
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Technology Uses in Education, Undergraduate Students, Student Attitudes, Affordances, Ethics, Barriers, Student Needs, Technological Literacy, Teacher Role, Program Effectiveness
ISSN: 2688-7061
Abstract: As generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools such as ChatGPT, Copilot, and BearcatGPT become more common in higher education, undergraduate students are increasingly using them to support learning, often without formal guidance from instructors. This mixed-methods study explores how students use, perceive, and navigate AI in their coursework, focusing on both learning benefits and ethical challenges. With Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval, data were collected from 240 anonymous survey responses and 40 semi-structured interviews in General Chemistry, Biology, and other STEM courses. Results show that nearly three-fourths of students have used AI for study support, most commonly to review concepts, generate practice problems, and clarify feedback. ChatGPT and Grammarly were the most frequently used tools, followed by Copilot and BearcatGPT, an institutionally managed generative AI platform developed for educational use. While students valued AI for its accessibility and immediacy, nearly half expressed uncertainty about what constitutes ethical use, citing confusion about academic integrity policies. Qualitative analysis revealed themes of curiosity, self-directed experimentation, and a strong desire for clearer faculty guidance. Findings suggest that students are using AI as a supplemental learning aid rather than a shortcut, but the lack of consistent instruction can lead to inequitable outcomes. The study concludes with recommendations for embedding AI literacy and responsible-use frameworks into course design to promote effective and ethical engagement with emerging technologies.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2026
Accession Number: EJ1494262
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
CustomLinks:
  – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1494262
    Name: ERIC Full Text
    Category: fullText
    Text: Full Text from ERIC
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: EJ1494262
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: AI in the Hands of Students: How Undergraduate Use and Perceive Generative Tools
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Smita+Jadhav%22">Smita Jadhav</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0009-0006-1851-2284">0009-0006-1851-2284</externalLink>)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22International+Journal+on+Social+and+Education+Sciences%22"><i>International Journal on Social and Education Sciences</i></searchLink>. 2026 8(1):115-128.
– Name: Avail
  Label: Availability
  Group: Avail
  Data: International Society for Technology, Education, and Science. ISTES Organization, Monument, CO 80132. e-mail: istesorganization@gmail.com; e-mail: ijonsesoffice@gmail.com; Web site: https://www.ijonses.net/index.php/ijonses
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Y
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 14
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2026
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research<br />Tests/Questionnaires
– Name: Audience
  Label: Education Level
  Group: Audnce
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Artificial+Intelligence%22">Artificial Intelligence</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Technology+Uses+in+Education%22">Technology Uses in Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Undergraduate+Students%22">Undergraduate Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Attitudes%22">Student Attitudes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Affordances%22">Affordances</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Ethics%22">Ethics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Barriers%22">Barriers</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Needs%22">Student Needs</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Technological+Literacy%22">Technological Literacy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teacher+Role%22">Teacher Role</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Program+Effectiveness%22">Program Effectiveness</searchLink>
– Name: ISSN
  Label: ISSN
  Group: ISSN
  Data: 2688-7061
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: As generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools such as ChatGPT, Copilot, and BearcatGPT become more common in higher education, undergraduate students are increasingly using them to support learning, often without formal guidance from instructors. This mixed-methods study explores how students use, perceive, and navigate AI in their coursework, focusing on both learning benefits and ethical challenges. With Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval, data were collected from 240 anonymous survey responses and 40 semi-structured interviews in General Chemistry, Biology, and other STEM courses. Results show that nearly three-fourths of students have used AI for study support, most commonly to review concepts, generate practice problems, and clarify feedback. ChatGPT and Grammarly were the most frequently used tools, followed by Copilot and BearcatGPT, an institutionally managed generative AI platform developed for educational use. While students valued AI for its accessibility and immediacy, nearly half expressed uncertainty about what constitutes ethical use, citing confusion about academic integrity policies. Qualitative analysis revealed themes of curiosity, self-directed experimentation, and a strong desire for clearer faculty guidance. Findings suggest that students are using AI as a supplemental learning aid rather than a shortcut, but the lack of consistent instruction can lead to inequitable outcomes. The study concludes with recommendations for embedding AI literacy and responsible-use frameworks into course design to promote effective and ethical engagement with emerging technologies.
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: As Provided
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2026
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: EJ1494262
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1494262
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 14
        StartPage: 115
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Artificial Intelligence
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Technology Uses in Education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Undergraduate Students
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Student Attitudes
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Affordances
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Ethics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Barriers
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Student Needs
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Technological Literacy
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Teacher Role
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Program Effectiveness
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: AI in the Hands of Students: How Undergraduate Use and Perceive Generative Tools
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Smita Jadhav
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 01
              Type: published
              Y: 2026
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-electronic
              Value: 2688-7061
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 8
            – Type: issue
              Value: 1
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: International Journal on Social and Education Sciences
              Type: main
ResultId 1