Reimagining Admissions to Realize Equity in Teacher Education Programs

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Reimagining Admissions to Realize Equity in Teacher Education Programs
Language: English
Authors: Kathyrn Hibbert, Deanna Friesen, Rebecca Cole, Mary Ott, Janelle Rouse, Robyn Michaud, Yi Chen, Kevin Hobbs
Source: Journal of Teaching and Learning. 2026 20(1):402-416.
Availability: Journal of Teaching and Learning. 401 Sunset Ave. Faculty of Education, University of Windsor, Windsor, Ontario, Canada N9B 3P4. Tel: 519-253-3000 Ext. 4068; e-mail: jtl@uwindsor.ca; Web site: https://ojs.uwindsor.ca/index.php/JTL
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 15
Publication Date: 2026
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: Higher Education
Postsecondary Education
Descriptors: Teacher Education Programs, College Admission, Admission Criteria, Equal Education, Preservice Teacher Education, Preservice Teachers, College Applicants, Educational Practices, Foreign Countries, Scores
Geographic Terms: Canada
ISSN: 1492-1154
1911-8279
Abstract: Faculties of Education make important decisions about who our next generation of teachers will be. While universities have been making declarations of commitment to equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) principles, there is little alignment between their stated goals and their admissions practices. This study examined the relationship between two metrics intended to identify strong teacher candidates (i.e., experience profile scores and Computer-Based Assessment for Sampling Personal Characteristics (CASPer) z scores) to determine whether they identify the same candidates. The second goal was to examine the relative contributions of our admission criteria to our decision-making process. Data from 3017 teacher education applicants were analyzed. All variables were unique and significant predictors of admission status. Poor agreement was observed between the two admission metrics. However, the CASPer data addressed non-cognitive metrics and identified who was more likely to struggle in the program. We used this data to reimagine our admissions process, creating a more just and equitable system.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2026
Accession Number: EJ1494658
Database: ERIC
Description
Abstract:Faculties of Education make important decisions about who our next generation of teachers will be. While universities have been making declarations of commitment to equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) principles, there is little alignment between their stated goals and their admissions practices. This study examined the relationship between two metrics intended to identify strong teacher candidates (i.e., experience profile scores and Computer-Based Assessment for Sampling Personal Characteristics (CASPer) z scores) to determine whether they identify the same candidates. The second goal was to examine the relative contributions of our admission criteria to our decision-making process. Data from 3017 teacher education applicants were analyzed. All variables were unique and significant predictors of admission status. Poor agreement was observed between the two admission metrics. However, the CASPer data addressed non-cognitive metrics and identified who was more likely to struggle in the program. We used this data to reimagine our admissions process, creating a more just and equitable system.
ISSN:1492-1154
1911-8279