GenAI in Course Materials: Faculty Use and Perceptions
Saved in:
| Title: | GenAI in Course Materials: Faculty Use and Perceptions |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Fawzi BenMessaoud, Ryan Brewer, Andre Buchenot, Kevin Jones, Krista Longtin, Lamia Scherzinger |
| Source: | Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology. 2025 14:213-224. |
| Availability: | Indiana University. 107 South Indiana Avenue, Bryan Hall 203B, Bloomington, IN 47405. Tel: 317-274-5647; Fax: 317-278-2360; e-mail: josotl@iu.edu; Web site: https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/jotlt |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 12 |
| Publication Date: | 2025 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Higher Education Postsecondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Artificial Intelligence, Research Universities, College Faculty, Teacher Attitudes, Teaching Methods, Technology Uses in Education, Public Colleges, Instructional Materials, Educational Practices |
| Geographic Terms: | Indiana (Indianapolis) |
| ISSN: | 2165-2554 |
| Abstract: | As generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) becomes increasingly relevant in higher education, faculty face growing pressure to integrate it ethically and effectively into teaching. While students are already using GenAI and seek faculty guidance, course materials often lack clear policies or instructional support. This study surveyed faculty and analyzed syllabi at a large public Midwestern research university to examine how GenAI is addressed in instruction. Findings reveal that faculty generally view GenAI as a potentially useful learning tool but report limited institutional guidance and inconsistent classroom practices. Despite some departmental efforts to establish GenAI policies, consensus on best practices is lacking. These results underscore the need for clearer institutional frameworks and faculty development to support ethical, pedagogically sound use of GenAI. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2026 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1494985 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1494985 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1494985 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: GenAI in Course Materials: Faculty Use and Perceptions – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Fawzi+BenMessaoud%22">Fawzi BenMessaoud</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ryan+Brewer%22">Ryan Brewer</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Andre+Buchenot%22">Andre Buchenot</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Kevin+Jones%22">Kevin Jones</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Krista+Longtin%22">Krista Longtin</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Lamia+Scherzinger%22">Lamia Scherzinger</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Journal+of+Teaching+and+Learning+with+Technology%22"><i>Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology</i></searchLink>. 2025 14:213-224. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Indiana University. 107 South Indiana Avenue, Bryan Hall 203B, Bloomington, IN 47405. Tel: 317-274-5647; Fax: 317-278-2360; e-mail: josotl@iu.edu; Web site: https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/jotlt – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 12 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2025 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Artificial+Intelligence%22">Artificial Intelligence</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+Universities%22">Research Universities</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+Faculty%22">College Faculty</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teacher+Attitudes%22">Teacher Attitudes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teaching+Methods%22">Teaching Methods</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Technology+Uses+in+Education%22">Technology Uses in Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Public+Colleges%22">Public Colleges</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Instructional+Materials%22">Instructional Materials</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Practices%22">Educational Practices</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Indiana+%28Indianapolis%29%22">Indiana (Indianapolis)</searchLink> – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 2165-2554 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: As generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) becomes increasingly relevant in higher education, faculty face growing pressure to integrate it ethically and effectively into teaching. While students are already using GenAI and seek faculty guidance, course materials often lack clear policies or instructional support. This study surveyed faculty and analyzed syllabi at a large public Midwestern research university to examine how GenAI is addressed in instruction. Findings reveal that faculty generally view GenAI as a potentially useful learning tool but report limited institutional guidance and inconsistent classroom practices. Despite some departmental efforts to establish GenAI policies, consensus on best practices is lacking. These results underscore the need for clearer institutional frameworks and faculty development to support ethical, pedagogically sound use of GenAI. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2026 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1494985 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1494985 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 12 StartPage: 213 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Artificial Intelligence Type: general – SubjectFull: Research Universities Type: general – SubjectFull: College Faculty Type: general – SubjectFull: Teacher Attitudes Type: general – SubjectFull: Teaching Methods Type: general – SubjectFull: Technology Uses in Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Public Colleges Type: general – SubjectFull: Instructional Materials Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational Practices Type: general – SubjectFull: Indiana (Indianapolis) Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: GenAI in Course Materials: Faculty Use and Perceptions Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Fawzi BenMessaoud – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Ryan Brewer – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Andre Buchenot – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Kevin Jones – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Krista Longtin – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Lamia Scherzinger IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2025 Identifiers: – Type: issn-electronic Value: 2165-2554 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 14 Titles: – TitleFull: Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |