View in EDS

Enhancing University EFL Learners' Writing Performance: The Role of AI-Enhanced Goal-Setting, Feedback and Social Norm Interventions

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Enhancing University EFL Learners' Writing Performance: The Role of AI-Enhanced Goal-Setting, Feedback and Social Norm Interventions
Language: English
Authors: Yan Wang (ORCID 0009-0002-6273-7094)
Source: Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 2026 42(1).
Availability: Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www.wiley.com/en-us
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 30
Publication Date: 2026
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: Higher Education
Postsecondary Education
Descriptors: College Students, Second Language Learning, English (Second Language), Writing (Composition), Writing Achievement, Goal Orientation, Feedback (Response), Artificial Intelligence, Technology Uses in Education, Self Efficacy, Writing Attitudes, Academic Language, Writing Instruction, Instructional Effectiveness
DOI: 10.1002/jcal.70179
ISSN: 0266-4909
1365-2729
Abstract: Background: English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners often struggle to develop robust academic writing, especially in online settings with limited feedback and interaction. Existing AI writing tools show promise but are often tested in brief, isolated interventions, so little is known about which AI-supported strategies are most effective. Objectives: In a four-arm randomised controlled trial (N = 383), three AI-enhanced nudges (goal-setting, feedback, social norm) were compared with an active control across 18 × 90-min sessions (total dose = 27 h). Posttest group differences were large (Welch's F (3, 188.454) = 1447.280, p < 0.001, [eta-squared] = 0.895), with the goal-setting nudge yielding the highest writing performance (M = 20.24/25, 81.0% of maximum). Methods: University EFL students were randomly assigned to three AI-enhanced nudge conditions (goal-setting, feedback, social norm) or an active control in a pretest-posttest design. Interventions drew on social cognitive theory (SCT) and nonlinear dynamic language learning theory (NDLLT) and were delivered over 18 × 90-min sessions. Writing performance, motivation and self-efficacy were assessed with validated instruments, complemented by interviews and reflective essays. Results and Conclusions: Goal-setting nudges produced the largest gains in writing performance, motivation and self-efficacy, with feedback and social norm nudges also outperforming the active control. Effect sizes were large: goal-setting versus control [delta]M = 11.01, 95% CI [10.51, 11.52] for performance; [delta]M = 3.50, 95% CI [3.16, 3.83] for motivation; [delta]M = 3.22, 95% CI [2.95, 3.49] for self-efficacy. Students described AI-enhanced goal-setting as making tasks more manageable and progress more visible, while AI feedback and peer comparisons supported revision and engagement. Overall, the findings suggest that carefully designed, instructor-mediated AI nudges can substantially enhance EFL academic writing when used to supplement, rather than replace, human teaching. Centring on three research questions, RQ1 tested differential effects of the three nudges versus control on writing performance, motivation and self-efficacy; RQ2 examined learners' perceived effectiveness and experiences across modalities; RQ3 explored the correspondence between quantitative performance gains and qualitative learner insights.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2026
Accession Number: EJ1495861
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: EJ1495861
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Enhancing University EFL Learners&#39; Writing Performance: The Role of AI-Enhanced Goal-Setting, Feedback and Social Norm Interventions
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Yan+Wang%22&quot;&gt;Yan Wang&lt;/searchLink&gt; (ORCID &lt;externalLink term=&quot;https://orcid.org/0009-0002-6273-7094&quot;&gt;0009-0002-6273-7094&lt;/externalLink&gt;)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;SO&quot; term=&quot;%22Journal+of+Computer+Assisted+Learning%22&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;Journal of Computer Assisted Learning&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/searchLink&gt;. 2026 42(1).
– Name: Avail
  Label: Availability
  Group: Avail
  Data: Wiley. Available from: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www.wiley.com/en-us
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Y
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 30
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2026
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Journal Articles&lt;br /&gt;Reports - Research
– Name: Audience
  Label: Education Level
  Group: Audnce
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;EL&quot; term=&quot;%22Higher+Education%22&quot;&gt;Higher Education&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;EL&quot; term=&quot;%22Postsecondary+Education%22&quot;&gt;Postsecondary Education&lt;/searchLink&gt;
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22College+Students%22&quot;&gt;College Students&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Second+Language+Learning%22&quot;&gt;Second Language Learning&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22English+%28Second+Language%29%22&quot;&gt;English (Second Language)&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Writing+%28Composition%29%22&quot;&gt;Writing (Composition)&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Writing+Achievement%22&quot;&gt;Writing Achievement&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Goal+Orientation%22&quot;&gt;Goal Orientation&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Feedback+%28Response%29%22&quot;&gt;Feedback (Response)&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Artificial+Intelligence%22&quot;&gt;Artificial Intelligence&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Technology+Uses+in+Education%22&quot;&gt;Technology Uses in Education&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Self+Efficacy%22&quot;&gt;Self Efficacy&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Writing+Attitudes%22&quot;&gt;Writing Attitudes&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Academic+Language%22&quot;&gt;Academic Language&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Writing+Instruction%22&quot;&gt;Writing Instruction&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Instructional+Effectiveness%22&quot;&gt;Instructional Effectiveness&lt;/searchLink&gt;
– Name: DOI
  Label: DOI
  Group: ID
  Data: 10.1002/jcal.70179
– Name: ISSN
  Label: ISSN
  Group: ISSN
  Data: 0266-4909&lt;br /&gt;1365-2729
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Background: English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners often struggle to develop robust academic writing, especially in online settings with limited feedback and interaction. Existing AI writing tools show promise but are often tested in brief, isolated interventions, so little is known about which AI-supported strategies are most effective. Objectives: In a four-arm randomised controlled trial (N = 383), three AI-enhanced nudges (goal-setting, feedback, social norm) were compared with an active control across 18 &#215; 90-min sessions (total dose = 27 h). Posttest group differences were large (Welch&#39;s F (3, 188.454) = 1447.280, p &lt; 0.001, [eta-squared] = 0.895), with the goal-setting nudge yielding the highest writing performance (M = 20.24/25, 81.0% of maximum). Methods: University EFL students were randomly assigned to three AI-enhanced nudge conditions (goal-setting, feedback, social norm) or an active control in a pretest-posttest design. Interventions drew on social cognitive theory (SCT) and nonlinear dynamic language learning theory (NDLLT) and were delivered over 18 &#215; 90-min sessions. Writing performance, motivation and self-efficacy were assessed with validated instruments, complemented by interviews and reflective essays. Results and Conclusions: Goal-setting nudges produced the largest gains in writing performance, motivation and self-efficacy, with feedback and social norm nudges also outperforming the active control. Effect sizes were large: goal-setting versus control [delta]M = 11.01, 95% CI [10.51, 11.52] for performance; [delta]M = 3.50, 95% CI [3.16, 3.83] for motivation; [delta]M = 3.22, 95% CI [2.95, 3.49] for self-efficacy. Students described AI-enhanced goal-setting as making tasks more manageable and progress more visible, while AI feedback and peer comparisons supported revision and engagement. Overall, the findings suggest that carefully designed, instructor-mediated AI nudges can substantially enhance EFL academic writing when used to supplement, rather than replace, human teaching. Centring on three research questions, RQ1 tested differential effects of the three nudges versus control on writing performance, motivation and self-efficacy; RQ2 examined learners&#39; perceived effectiveness and experiences across modalities; RQ3 explored the correspondence between quantitative performance gains and qualitative learner insights.
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: As Provided
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2026
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: EJ1495861
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1495861
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1002/jcal.70179
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 30
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: College Students
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Second Language Learning
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: English (Second Language)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Writing (Composition)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Writing Achievement
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Goal Orientation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Feedback (Response)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Artificial Intelligence
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Technology Uses in Education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Self Efficacy
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Writing Attitudes
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Academic Language
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Writing Instruction
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Instructional Effectiveness
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Enhancing University EFL Learners' Writing Performance: The Role of AI-Enhanced Goal-Setting, Feedback and Social Norm Interventions
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Yan Wang
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 02
              Type: published
              Y: 2026
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 0266-4909
            – Type: issn-electronic
              Value: 1365-2729
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 42
            – Type: issue
              Value: 1
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
              Type: main
ResultId 1