Utility and Feasibility of Objective Structured Practical Examination for Formative Assessment in Physiology: A Mixed-Methods Study from India

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Utility and Feasibility of Objective Structured Practical Examination for Formative Assessment in Physiology: A Mixed-Methods Study from India
Language: English
Authors: Anumeha Bhagat (ORCID 0000-0001-9338-1073), Kiran Prakash (ORCID 0000-0003-4133-8545), Rashmi Chandel (ORCID 0000-0001-5328-7453), Anita S. Malhotra, Dipti Magan (ORCID 0000-0003-2982-1294)
Source: Advances in Physiology Education. 2026 50(1):132-139.
Availability: American Physiological Society. 9650 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20814-3991. Tel: 301-634-7164; Fax: 301-634-7241; e-mail: webmaster@the-aps.org; Web site: https://www.physiology.org/journal/advances
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 8
Publication Date: 2026
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Tests/Questionnaires
Education Level: Higher Education
Postsecondary Education
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, College Freshmen, Medical Education, Physiology, Test Construction, Skill Analysis, Minimum Competency Testing, Formative Evaluation, Student Attitudes, Objective Tests
Geographic Terms: India
DOI: 10.1152/advan.00170.2025
ISSN: 1043-4046
1522-1229
Abstract: Objective Structured Practical Examination (OSPE) is a structured, competency-based method for assessing practical skills. While OSPE is well established in clinical settings as Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE), its feasibility and utility for formative assessment in preclinical subjects like Physiology in India remain underexplored. The aim of the study was to evaluate the feasibility, utility, and student perceptions of OSPE as a formative assessment tool for practical Physiology competencies. This mixed-methods study was conducted among 100 first-year Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery (MBBS) students. Two OSPE assessments were conducted 1 mo apart. Core certifiable competencies on blood pressure measurement and neurological examination were assessed. Quantitative analysis compared student scores across both assessments. Student perceptions were documented using a feedback questionnaire. Narrative feedback from students was analyzed through thematic analysis. Students performed better on their second OSPE assessment than the first one (P < 0.001) for all but one of the six questions. This may partly reflect a testing effect from reassessment of similar competencies. Questionnaire responses indicated strong agreement on OSPE's fairness (80%) and relevance (97.3%), with 81.3% advocating for its regular use. Thematic analysis highlighted strengths such as objectivity and skill focus, alongside weaknesses (time constraints and limited feedback) and threats (logistical challenges and subject cooperation). OSPE is a feasible and effective formative assessment tool for Physiology within the Indian Competency Based Medical Education (CBME) framework. This work adds context-specific insights from a resource-constrained Indian setting, offering practical directions for sustainable OSPE integration.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2026
Accession Number: EJ1497547
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: EJ1497547
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Utility and Feasibility of Objective Structured Practical Examination for Formative Assessment in Physiology: A Mixed-Methods Study from India
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Anumeha+Bhagat%22&quot;&gt;Anumeha Bhagat&lt;/searchLink&gt; (ORCID &lt;externalLink term=&quot;https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9338-1073&quot;&gt;0000-0001-9338-1073&lt;/externalLink&gt;)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Kiran+Prakash%22&quot;&gt;Kiran Prakash&lt;/searchLink&gt; (ORCID &lt;externalLink term=&quot;https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4133-8545&quot;&gt;0000-0003-4133-8545&lt;/externalLink&gt;)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Rashmi+Chandel%22&quot;&gt;Rashmi Chandel&lt;/searchLink&gt; (ORCID &lt;externalLink term=&quot;https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5328-7453&quot;&gt;0000-0001-5328-7453&lt;/externalLink&gt;)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Anita+S%2E+Malhotra%22&quot;&gt;Anita S. Malhotra&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Dipti+Magan%22&quot;&gt;Dipti Magan&lt;/searchLink&gt; (ORCID &lt;externalLink term=&quot;https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2982-1294&quot;&gt;0000-0003-2982-1294&lt;/externalLink&gt;)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;SO&quot; term=&quot;%22Advances+in+Physiology+Education%22&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;Advances in Physiology Education&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/searchLink&gt;. 2026 50(1):132-139.
– Name: Avail
  Label: Availability
  Group: Avail
  Data: American Physiological Society. 9650 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20814-3991. Tel: 301-634-7164; Fax: 301-634-7241; e-mail: webmaster@the-aps.org; Web site: https://www.physiology.org/journal/advances
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Y
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 8
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2026
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Journal Articles&lt;br /&gt;Reports - Research&lt;br /&gt;Tests/Questionnaires
– Name: Audience
  Label: Education Level
  Group: Audnce
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;EL&quot; term=&quot;%22Higher+Education%22&quot;&gt;Higher Education&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;EL&quot; term=&quot;%22Postsecondary+Education%22&quot;&gt;Postsecondary Education&lt;/searchLink&gt;
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Foreign+Countries%22&quot;&gt;Foreign Countries&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22College+Freshmen%22&quot;&gt;College Freshmen&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Medical+Education%22&quot;&gt;Medical Education&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Physiology%22&quot;&gt;Physiology&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Test+Construction%22&quot;&gt;Test Construction&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Skill+Analysis%22&quot;&gt;Skill Analysis&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Minimum+Competency+Testing%22&quot;&gt;Minimum Competency Testing&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Formative+Evaluation%22&quot;&gt;Formative Evaluation&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Student+Attitudes%22&quot;&gt;Student Attitudes&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Objective+Tests%22&quot;&gt;Objective Tests&lt;/searchLink&gt;
– Name: Subject
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22India%22&quot;&gt;India&lt;/searchLink&gt;
– Name: DOI
  Label: DOI
  Group: ID
  Data: 10.1152/advan.00170.2025
– Name: ISSN
  Label: ISSN
  Group: ISSN
  Data: 1043-4046&lt;br /&gt;1522-1229
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Objective Structured Practical Examination (OSPE) is a structured, competency-based method for assessing practical skills. While OSPE is well established in clinical settings as Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE), its feasibility and utility for formative assessment in preclinical subjects like Physiology in India remain underexplored. The aim of the study was to evaluate the feasibility, utility, and student perceptions of OSPE as a formative assessment tool for practical Physiology competencies. This mixed-methods study was conducted among 100 first-year Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery (MBBS) students. Two OSPE assessments were conducted 1 mo apart. Core certifiable competencies on blood pressure measurement and neurological examination were assessed. Quantitative analysis compared student scores across both assessments. Student perceptions were documented using a feedback questionnaire. Narrative feedback from students was analyzed through thematic analysis. Students performed better on their second OSPE assessment than the first one (P &lt; 0.001) for all but one of the six questions. This may partly reflect a testing effect from reassessment of similar competencies. Questionnaire responses indicated strong agreement on OSPE&#39;s fairness (80%) and relevance (97.3%), with 81.3% advocating for its regular use. Thematic analysis highlighted strengths such as objectivity and skill focus, alongside weaknesses (time constraints and limited feedback) and threats (logistical challenges and subject cooperation). OSPE is a feasible and effective formative assessment tool for Physiology within the Indian Competency Based Medical Education (CBME) framework. This work adds context-specific insights from a resource-constrained Indian setting, offering practical directions for sustainable OSPE integration.
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: As Provided
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2026
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: EJ1497547
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1497547
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1152/advan.00170.2025
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 8
        StartPage: 132
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Foreign Countries
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: College Freshmen
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Medical Education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Physiology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Test Construction
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Skill Analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Minimum Competency Testing
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Formative Evaluation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Student Attitudes
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Objective Tests
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: India
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Utility and Feasibility of Objective Structured Practical Examination for Formative Assessment in Physiology: A Mixed-Methods Study from India
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Anumeha Bhagat
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Kiran Prakash
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Rashmi Chandel
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Anita S. Malhotra
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Dipti Magan
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 01
              Type: published
              Y: 2026
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 1043-4046
            – Type: issn-electronic
              Value: 1522-1229
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 50
            – Type: issue
              Value: 1
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Advances in Physiology Education
              Type: main
ResultId 1