Generative AI Highlights the Contrast between Students' Dualistic Epistemic Practices and Teacher Education Learning Objectives
Saved in:
| Title: | Generative AI Highlights the Contrast between Students' Dualistic Epistemic Practices and Teacher Education Learning Objectives |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Tellervo Härkki, Tarmo Thorström, Miika Leino, Henriikka Vartiainen, Matti Tedre |
| Source: | Australian Journal of Teacher Education. 2025 50(4):59-83. |
| Availability: | Edith Cowan University. Bradford Street, Mount Lawley, West Australia 6050, Australia. Web site: http://ro.ecu.edu.au/ajte/ |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 26 |
| Publication Date: | 2025 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Higher Education Postsecondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Artificial Intelligence, Epistemology, Teacher Education, Learning Objectives, Student Teachers, Technology Uses in Education, Student Research, Student Attitudes, Undergraduate Students, Research Skills, Foreign Countries, Preservice Teachers |
| Geographic Terms: | Finland |
| ISSN: | 0313-5373 1835-517X |
| Abstract: | This study examines student teachers' capabilities when adopting a generative AI system as a new cognitive tool. In our pedagogical intervention, students used ChatGPT 3.5 to support a small research task. Consistent with decades of research on higher education students' epistemic positions, most students approached the knowledge-building task (and, respectively, ChatGPT) with dualistic epistemic practices. Notably, ChatGPT's polished interface invites naïve dualistic interpretations. However, teacher education learning objectives and effective knowledge-building with generative AI tools require more sophisticated epistemic stances: understanding knowledge as contingent and context-bound and knowledge-building as an activity that requires validation. This suggests that the central challenge for teacher education is not generative AI per se but supporting students' epistemic development so that they can use such tools responsibly. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2026 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1497656 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1497656 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1497656 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Generative AI Highlights the Contrast between Students' Dualistic Epistemic Practices and Teacher Education Learning Objectives – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Tellervo+Härkki%22">Tellervo Härkki</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Tarmo+Thorström%22">Tarmo Thorström</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Miika+Leino%22">Miika Leino</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Henriikka+Vartiainen%22">Henriikka Vartiainen</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Matti+Tedre%22">Matti Tedre</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Australian+Journal+of+Teacher+Education%22"><i>Australian Journal of Teacher Education</i></searchLink>. 2025 50(4):59-83. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Edith Cowan University. Bradford Street, Mount Lawley, West Australia 6050, Australia. Web site: http://ro.ecu.edu.au/ajte/ – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 26 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2025 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Artificial+Intelligence%22">Artificial Intelligence</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Epistemology%22">Epistemology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teacher+Education%22">Teacher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Learning+Objectives%22">Learning Objectives</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Teachers%22">Student Teachers</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Technology+Uses+in+Education%22">Technology Uses in Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Research%22">Student Research</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Attitudes%22">Student Attitudes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Undergraduate+Students%22">Undergraduate Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+Skills%22">Research Skills</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Foreign+Countries%22">Foreign Countries</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Preservice+Teachers%22">Preservice Teachers</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Finland%22">Finland</searchLink> – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 0313-5373<br />1835-517X – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: This study examines student teachers' capabilities when adopting a generative AI system as a new cognitive tool. In our pedagogical intervention, students used ChatGPT 3.5 to support a small research task. Consistent with decades of research on higher education students' epistemic positions, most students approached the knowledge-building task (and, respectively, ChatGPT) with dualistic epistemic practices. Notably, ChatGPT's polished interface invites naïve dualistic interpretations. However, teacher education learning objectives and effective knowledge-building with generative AI tools require more sophisticated epistemic stances: understanding knowledge as contingent and context-bound and knowledge-building as an activity that requires validation. This suggests that the central challenge for teacher education is not generative AI per se but supporting students' epistemic development so that they can use such tools responsibly. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2026 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1497656 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1497656 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 26 StartPage: 59 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Artificial Intelligence Type: general – SubjectFull: Epistemology Type: general – SubjectFull: Teacher Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Learning Objectives Type: general – SubjectFull: Student Teachers Type: general – SubjectFull: Technology Uses in Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Student Research Type: general – SubjectFull: Student Attitudes Type: general – SubjectFull: Undergraduate Students Type: general – SubjectFull: Research Skills Type: general – SubjectFull: Foreign Countries Type: general – SubjectFull: Preservice Teachers Type: general – SubjectFull: Finland Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Generative AI Highlights the Contrast between Students' Dualistic Epistemic Practices and Teacher Education Learning Objectives Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Tellervo Härkki – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Tarmo Thorström – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Miika Leino – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Henriikka Vartiainen – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Matti Tedre IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2025 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 0313-5373 – Type: issn-electronic Value: 1835-517X Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 50 – Type: issue Value: 4 Titles: – TitleFull: Australian Journal of Teacher Education Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |