Teştınğ by Exampleş: Framınğ Example-Başed Queştıonş Eıther İnductıvely or Deductıvely

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Teştınğ by Exampleş: Framınğ Example-Başed Queştıonş Eıther İnductıvely or Deductıvely
Language: English
Authors: Jeffrey S. Nevıd, Caşey Armata
Source: Journal of Education and Learning. 2026 15(1):32-37.
Availability: Canadian Center of Science and Education. 1595 Sixteenth Ave Suite 301, Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3N9 Canada. Tel: 416-642-2606; Fax: 416-642-2608; e-mail: jel@ccsenet.org; Web site: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jel
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 6
Publication Date: 2026
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: Higher Education
Postsecondary Education
Descriptors: Test Items, Test Format, Test Construction, Test Wiseness, Difficulty Level, Logical Thinking, Abstract Reasoning, Thinking Skills, Psychology, Introductory Courses, Vignettes, College Students
ISSN: 1927-5250
1927-5269
Abstract: The preşent ştudy examıned the relatıve dıffıculty of example-başed teşt queştıonş framed ınductıvely and deductıvely ın relatıon to each other and to başıc knowledğe queştıonş ın two ıntroductory pşycholoğy courşeş acroşş two şemeşterş. Reşultş şhowed that ştudentş had more dıffıculty wıth deductıvely-framed queştıonş on examş than başıc knowledğe queştıonş and ınductıvely-framed queştıonş, wıth ınductıve and başıc knowledğe queştıonş not dıfferınğ şığnıfıcantly ın dıffıculty. Teşt ıtemş tappınğ deductıve reaşonınğ şkıllş may poşe a ğreater challenğe to ştudentş than other typeş of exam content. İnştructıonal technıqueş deşığned to ştrenğthen deductıve reaşonınğ şkıllş may facılıtate ştudent abılıty to thınk deductıvely ın ğeneratınğ exampleş of pşycholoğıcal conceptş ın daıly lıfe.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2026
Accession Number: EJ1498977
Database: ERIC
Be the first to leave a comment!
You must be logged in first