Review Findings from Ethical Reviews of Non-Medical Research in Japan

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Review Findings from Ethical Reviews of Non-Medical Research in Japan
Language: English
Authors: Takuya Watanabe
Source: Journal of Academic Ethics. 2026 24(1).
Availability: BioMed Central, Ltd. Available from: Springer Nature. 233 Spring Street, New York, NY 10013. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-348-4505; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://www.springer.com/gp/biomedical-sciences
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 11
Publication Date: 2026
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: Higher Education
Postsecondary Education
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Ethics, Research Committees, Research Administration, Universities, Research Proposals, Graduate Students, College Faculty, Research Needs, Consent
Geographic Terms: Japan
DOI: 10.1007/s10805-025-09710-3
ISSN: 1570-1727
1572-8544
Abstract: This study examined how ethical reviews are actually conducted in non-medical research in Japan through an analysis of 70 review comments on 19 proposals reviewed by the ethics committee of University A in 2015, using the qualitative method SCAT (Steps for Coding and Theorization). Although non-medical research generally lacks the physical invasiveness characteristic of medical research, appropriate ethical considerations remain essential. The comments were classified into seven categories, with "Scientific rationality of the research plan," "Request for cooperation," and "Assessment of risks and benefits" being the most frequent. To facilitate interpretation, these categories were further organized into four overarching themes: (1) Methodological commitment, (2) Participant selection and protection, (3) Research benefits and foreseeable risks, and (4) Researcher's inadequate ethical reflections. Reviewers often required clearer articulation of research objectives, background, and methods, as well as more detailed explanations and consent procedures for participants, including attention to minors and withdrawal rights. These findings suggest that ethical review in non-medical research should go beyond procedural formality to ensure careful consideration of research purpose, participant rights, and potential risks, thereby supporting ethically sound research practices.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2026
Accession Number: EJ1500709
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: EJ1500709
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Review Findings from Ethical Reviews of Non-Medical Research in Japan
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Takuya+Watanabe%22">Takuya Watanabe</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Journal+of+Academic+Ethics%22"><i>Journal of Academic Ethics</i></searchLink>. 2026 24(1).
– Name: Avail
  Label: Availability
  Group: Avail
  Data: BioMed Central, Ltd. Available from: Springer Nature. 233 Spring Street, New York, NY 10013. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-348-4505; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://www.springer.com/gp/biomedical-sciences
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Y
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 11
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2026
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research
– Name: Audience
  Label: Education Level
  Group: Audnce
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Foreign+Countries%22">Foreign Countries</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Ethics%22">Ethics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+Committees%22">Research Committees</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+Administration%22">Research Administration</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Universities%22">Universities</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+Proposals%22">Research Proposals</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Graduate+Students%22">Graduate Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+Faculty%22">College Faculty</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+Needs%22">Research Needs</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Consent%22">Consent</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Japan%22">Japan</searchLink>
– Name: DOI
  Label: DOI
  Group: ID
  Data: 10.1007/s10805-025-09710-3
– Name: ISSN
  Label: ISSN
  Group: ISSN
  Data: 1570-1727<br />1572-8544
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: This study examined how ethical reviews are actually conducted in non-medical research in Japan through an analysis of 70 review comments on 19 proposals reviewed by the ethics committee of University A in 2015, using the qualitative method SCAT (Steps for Coding and Theorization). Although non-medical research generally lacks the physical invasiveness characteristic of medical research, appropriate ethical considerations remain essential. The comments were classified into seven categories, with "Scientific rationality of the research plan," "Request for cooperation," and "Assessment of risks and benefits" being the most frequent. To facilitate interpretation, these categories were further organized into four overarching themes: (1) Methodological commitment, (2) Participant selection and protection, (3) Research benefits and foreseeable risks, and (4) Researcher's inadequate ethical reflections. Reviewers often required clearer articulation of research objectives, background, and methods, as well as more detailed explanations and consent procedures for participants, including attention to minors and withdrawal rights. These findings suggest that ethical review in non-medical research should go beyond procedural formality to ensure careful consideration of research purpose, participant rights, and potential risks, thereby supporting ethically sound research practices.
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: As Provided
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2026
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: EJ1500709
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1500709
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1007/s10805-025-09710-3
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 11
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Foreign Countries
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Ethics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Research Committees
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Research Administration
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Universities
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Research Proposals
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Graduate Students
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: College Faculty
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Research Needs
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Consent
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Japan
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Review Findings from Ethical Reviews of Non-Medical Research in Japan
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Takuya Watanabe
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 03
              Type: published
              Y: 2026
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 1570-1727
            – Type: issn-electronic
              Value: 1572-8544
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 24
            – Type: issue
              Value: 1
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Journal of Academic Ethics
              Type: main
ResultId 1