A Comparative Analysis of Human and GenAI-Generated Feedback on EFL Students' Argumentative Writing Performance

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: A Comparative Analysis of Human and GenAI-Generated Feedback on EFL Students' Argumentative Writing Performance
Language: English
Authors: Mine Yıldız (ORCID 0000-0001-6215-4388), Arif Cem Topuz (ORCID 0000-0002-5110-5334), Hamza Polat (ORCID 0000-0002-9646-7507), Elif Taşlıbeyaz (ORCID 0000-0001-9770-6824), Engin Kurşun (ORCID 0000-0002-5649-8595), Savaş Yeşilyurt (ORCID 0000-0001-6871-8842)
Source: Educational Psychology. 2026 46(1):52-79.
Availability: Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 28
Publication Date: 2026
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: Higher Education
Postsecondary Education
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Artificial Intelligence, Persuasive Discourse, Writing Skills, Teacher Influence, Technology Uses in Education, College Students, English (Second Language), Language Teachers, Foreign Countries
Geographic Terms: Turkey
DOI: 10.1080/01443410.2025.2539797
ISSN: 0144-3410
1469-5820
Abstract: This study examined the impact of feedback provided by a human tutor (HT) and GenAI on the argumentative writing performance of L2 learners. A total of 59 students participating in the study were divided into two groups randomly: group 1 received feedback from the HT and group 2 received feedback from GenAI in the first task. For the second writing task, the groups were reversed. The mixed-ANCOVA test results revealed that students produced better final drafts after receiving feedback on their argumentative writing. Although GenAI-generated feedback had no significant difference in improving writing components and general writing performance, human-generated feedback promoted students' language, mechanics, and overall writing scores in their final drafts at a significant level. Therefore, it can be suggested that a balance between the two feedback sources should be achieved to provide EFL learners with effective feedback, promote their writing, and thus decrease HTs' workload.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2026
Accession Number: EJ1500948
Database: ERIC
Be the first to leave a comment!
You must be logged in first