Unpacking the Effects of GenAI on Cultivating Students' Computational Thinking: A Meta-Analysis
Saved in:
| Title: | Unpacking the Effects of GenAI on Cultivating Students' Computational Thinking: A Meta-Analysis |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Jie Xu (ORCID |
| Source: | Journal of Educational Computing Research. 2026 64(4):1024-1067. |
| Availability: | SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: https://sagepub.com |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 44 |
| Publication Date: | 2026 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Information Analyses |
| Education Level: | Elementary Secondary Education Postsecondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Computation, Thinking Skills, Problem Solving, Artificial Intelligence, Technology Uses in Education, Effect Size, Instructional Program Divisions, Elementary Secondary Education, Postsecondary Education, Geographic Regions, Intervention, Incidence, Teaching Methods, Interaction, Role, Feedback (Response) |
| DOI: | 10.1177/07356331261419586 |
| ISSN: | 0735-6331 1541-4140 |
| Abstract: | Computational thinking (CT) is crucial for enhancing students' complex problem-solving abilities in the intelligent era. The emergence of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is profoundly transforming the global educational landscape and demonstrating significant potential for promoting personalized learning. However, the literature offers varied results on the effectiveness of using GenAI to cultivate students' CT. This study comprehensively investigated the effects of GenAI on students' CT and the role of moderating factors, integrating 45 effect sizes from 25 empirical studies published between 2022 and 2025. A theoretical framework of factors influencing students' CT was proposed based on activity theory, and the moderating factors included educational level, region, intervention duration, teaching mode, interaction mode, role setting, and feedback type. The results indicated that GenAI had a significant overall positive effect on students' CT development. Specifically, the largest effect size was computational practice, followed by computational concept and computational perspective. Furthermore, the analysis revealed that region, teaching mode, and interaction mode had significant moderating effects. Based on these results, this study offers targeted implications across the dimensions of theoretical foundation, educational practice, and technological development, providing empirical evidence for implementing GenAI teaching and developing GenAI tools to cultivate students' CT. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2026 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1502166 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1502166 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Unpacking the Effects of GenAI on Cultivating Students' Computational Thinking: A Meta-Analysis – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Jie+Xu%22">Jie Xu</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3345-4116">0000-0003-3345-4116</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Zexi+Chen%22">Zexi Chen</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0009-0003-4406-1390">0009-0003-4406-1390</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Mengyao+Chen%22">Mengyao Chen</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Yan+Li%22">Yan Li</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Xianlong+Xu%22">Xianlong Xu</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0736-7932">0000-0003-0736-7932</externalLink>) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Journal+of+Educational+Computing+Research%22"><i>Journal of Educational Computing Research</i></searchLink>. 2026 64(4):1024-1067. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: https://sagepub.com – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 44 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2026 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Information Analyses – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Elementary+Secondary+Education%22">Elementary Secondary Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Computation%22">Computation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Thinking+Skills%22">Thinking Skills</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Problem+Solving%22">Problem Solving</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Artificial+Intelligence%22">Artificial Intelligence</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Technology+Uses+in+Education%22">Technology Uses in Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Effect+Size%22">Effect Size</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Instructional+Program+Divisions%22">Instructional Program Divisions</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Elementary+Secondary+Education%22">Elementary Secondary Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Geographic+Regions%22">Geographic Regions</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Intervention%22">Intervention</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Incidence%22">Incidence</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teaching+Methods%22">Teaching Methods</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Interaction%22">Interaction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Role%22">Role</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Feedback+%28Response%29%22">Feedback (Response)</searchLink> – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1177/07356331261419586 – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 0735-6331<br />1541-4140 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Computational thinking (CT) is crucial for enhancing students' complex problem-solving abilities in the intelligent era. The emergence of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is profoundly transforming the global educational landscape and demonstrating significant potential for promoting personalized learning. However, the literature offers varied results on the effectiveness of using GenAI to cultivate students' CT. This study comprehensively investigated the effects of GenAI on students' CT and the role of moderating factors, integrating 45 effect sizes from 25 empirical studies published between 2022 and 2025. A theoretical framework of factors influencing students' CT was proposed based on activity theory, and the moderating factors included educational level, region, intervention duration, teaching mode, interaction mode, role setting, and feedback type. The results indicated that GenAI had a significant overall positive effect on students' CT development. Specifically, the largest effect size was computational practice, followed by computational concept and computational perspective. Furthermore, the analysis revealed that region, teaching mode, and interaction mode had significant moderating effects. Based on these results, this study offers targeted implications across the dimensions of theoretical foundation, educational practice, and technological development, providing empirical evidence for implementing GenAI teaching and developing GenAI tools to cultivate students' CT. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2026 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1502166 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1502166 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1177/07356331261419586 Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 44 StartPage: 1024 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Computation Type: general – SubjectFull: Thinking Skills Type: general – SubjectFull: Problem Solving Type: general – SubjectFull: Artificial Intelligence Type: general – SubjectFull: Technology Uses in Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Effect Size Type: general – SubjectFull: Instructional Program Divisions Type: general – SubjectFull: Elementary Secondary Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Postsecondary Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Geographic Regions Type: general – SubjectFull: Intervention Type: general – SubjectFull: Incidence Type: general – SubjectFull: Teaching Methods Type: general – SubjectFull: Interaction Type: general – SubjectFull: Role Type: general – SubjectFull: Feedback (Response) Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Unpacking the Effects of GenAI on Cultivating Students' Computational Thinking: A Meta-Analysis Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Jie Xu – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Zexi Chen – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Mengyao Chen – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Yan Li – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Xianlong Xu IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 06 Type: published Y: 2026 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 0735-6331 – Type: issn-electronic Value: 1541-4140 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 64 – Type: issue Value: 4 Titles: – TitleFull: Journal of Educational Computing Research Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |