Examination of Student Perceptions of Asynchronous Learning Environments within the Framework of Technology Acceptance Model
Saved in:
| Title: | Examination of Student Perceptions of Asynchronous Learning Environments within the Framework of Technology Acceptance Model |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Elif Güzelyurt (ORCID |
| Source: | International Journal of Information and Learning Technology. 2026 43(2):155-168. |
| Availability: | Emerald Publishing Limited. Howard House, Wagon Lane, Bingley, West Yorkshire, BD16 1WA, UK. Tel: +44-1274-777700; Fax: +44-1274-785201; e-mail: emerald@emeraldinsight.com; Web site: http://www.emerald.com/insight |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 14 |
| Publication Date: | 2026 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Higher Education Postsecondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Student Attitudes, Asynchronous Communication, Emergency Programs, Distance Education, Electronic Learning, Universities, Student Characteristics, Fine Arts, Schools of Education, Engineering Education, Physical Activities, Learning Management Systems, Art Education, Sex, Age, Student Experience, Internet, Technology Uses in Education, Teaching Methods, Physical Education, Athletics |
| DOI: | 10.1108/IJILT-09-2024-0217 |
| ISSN: | 2056-4880 |
| Abstract: | Purpose: The aim of this study is to examine the opinions of university students studying in the emergency and distance education period about asynchronous learning environments within the framework of the Technology Acceptance Model. Design/methodology/approach: The population of this study, which was conducted with the survey model, consists of students studying at the Faculty of Education, Faculty of Engineering, Faculty of Sports Sciences and Faculty of Fine Arts of a state university. A total of 800 people studying in different departments participated in the study. The learning management system (LMS) Acceptance Scale was used to collect data. Findings: According to the results of the study, it was determined that the total mean scores of the participants were at a good level; there was a moderate level of acceptance in the "social influence" dimension and a good level of acceptance in other sub-dimensions. It was determined that university students' acceptance levels of LMSs differed according to gender, the way of connecting to the internet, age, faculty of study and the method of taking an important course related to their career. Students generally have high acceptance rates of LMSs in compulsory situations. However, they prefer face-to-face education, and their acceptance levels are likely to increase as the rate of using LMSs and their ability to direct their own learning increase. Originality/value: Determining the suitability of LMSs for student needs is important in determining the impact of these environments on student performance, the effort they spend, the ease of use of the environments and the social influence of these environments on students in order to continue lessons in an effective and attractive manner. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2026 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1503033 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1503033 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Examination of Student Perceptions of Asynchronous Learning Environments within the Framework of Technology Acceptance Model – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Elif+Güzelyurt%22">Elif Güzelyurt</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8911-4394">0000-0001-8911-4394</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Aynur+Kolburan+Geçer%22">Aynur Kolburan Geçer</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6121-0664">0000-0002-6121-0664</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Arzu+Deveci+Topal%22">Arzu Deveci Topal</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5090-8592">0000-0001-5090-8592</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Canan+Dilek+Eren%22">Canan Dilek Eren</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7004-5066">0000-0002-7004-5066</externalLink>) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22International+Journal+of+Information+and+Learning+Technology%22"><i>International Journal of Information and Learning Technology</i></searchLink>. 2026 43(2):155-168. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Emerald Publishing Limited. Howard House, Wagon Lane, Bingley, West Yorkshire, BD16 1WA, UK. Tel: +44-1274-777700; Fax: +44-1274-785201; e-mail: emerald@emeraldinsight.com; Web site: http://www.emerald.com/insight – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 14 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2026 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Attitudes%22">Student Attitudes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Asynchronous+Communication%22">Asynchronous Communication</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Emergency+Programs%22">Emergency Programs</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Distance+Education%22">Distance Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Electronic+Learning%22">Electronic Learning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Universities%22">Universities</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Characteristics%22">Student Characteristics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Fine+Arts%22">Fine Arts</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Schools+of+Education%22">Schools of Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Engineering+Education%22">Engineering Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Physical+Activities%22">Physical Activities</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Learning+Management+Systems%22">Learning Management Systems</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Art+Education%22">Art Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sex%22">Sex</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Age%22">Age</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Experience%22">Student Experience</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Internet%22">Internet</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Technology+Uses+in+Education%22">Technology Uses in Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teaching+Methods%22">Teaching Methods</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Physical+Education%22">Physical Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Athletics%22">Athletics</searchLink> – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1108/IJILT-09-2024-0217 – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 2056-4880 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Purpose: The aim of this study is to examine the opinions of university students studying in the emergency and distance education period about asynchronous learning environments within the framework of the Technology Acceptance Model. Design/methodology/approach: The population of this study, which was conducted with the survey model, consists of students studying at the Faculty of Education, Faculty of Engineering, Faculty of Sports Sciences and Faculty of Fine Arts of a state university. A total of 800 people studying in different departments participated in the study. The learning management system (LMS) Acceptance Scale was used to collect data. Findings: According to the results of the study, it was determined that the total mean scores of the participants were at a good level; there was a moderate level of acceptance in the "social influence" dimension and a good level of acceptance in other sub-dimensions. It was determined that university students' acceptance levels of LMSs differed according to gender, the way of connecting to the internet, age, faculty of study and the method of taking an important course related to their career. Students generally have high acceptance rates of LMSs in compulsory situations. However, they prefer face-to-face education, and their acceptance levels are likely to increase as the rate of using LMSs and their ability to direct their own learning increase. Originality/value: Determining the suitability of LMSs for student needs is important in determining the impact of these environments on student performance, the effort they spend, the ease of use of the environments and the social influence of these environments on students in order to continue lessons in an effective and attractive manner. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2026 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1503033 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1503033 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1108/IJILT-09-2024-0217 Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 14 StartPage: 155 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Student Attitudes Type: general – SubjectFull: Asynchronous Communication Type: general – SubjectFull: Emergency Programs Type: general – SubjectFull: Distance Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Electronic Learning Type: general – SubjectFull: Universities Type: general – SubjectFull: Student Characteristics Type: general – SubjectFull: Fine Arts Type: general – SubjectFull: Schools of Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Engineering Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Physical Activities Type: general – SubjectFull: Learning Management Systems Type: general – SubjectFull: Art Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Sex Type: general – SubjectFull: Age Type: general – SubjectFull: Student Experience Type: general – SubjectFull: Internet Type: general – SubjectFull: Technology Uses in Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Teaching Methods Type: general – SubjectFull: Physical Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Athletics Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Examination of Student Perceptions of Asynchronous Learning Environments within the Framework of Technology Acceptance Model Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Elif Güzelyurt – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Aynur Kolburan Geçer – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Arzu Deveci Topal – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Canan Dilek Eren IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 03 Type: published Y: 2026 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 2056-4880 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 43 – Type: issue Value: 2 Titles: – TitleFull: International Journal of Information and Learning Technology Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |