Transforming Pedagogy with GenAI-Supported Formative Assessment: Challenges for Teacher Education
Saved in:
| Title: | Transforming Pedagogy with GenAI-Supported Formative Assessment: Challenges for Teacher Education |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Mary Webb (ORCID |
| Source: | British Journal of Educational Technology. 2026 57(3):690-706. |
| Availability: | Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www.wiley.com/en-us |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 17 |
| Publication Date: | 2026 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Descriptive |
| Descriptors: | Artificial Intelligence, Technology Uses in Education, Formative Evaluation, Teacher Education, Educational Change, Technology Integration, Decision Making, Feedback (Response), Learning Processes, Digital Literacy, Ethics, Teacher Student Relationship |
| DOI: | 10.1111/bjet.70051 |
| ISSN: | 0007-1013 1467-8535 |
| Abstract: | This article examines the challenges primary and secondary teachers face in implementing formative assessment, with a particular focus on the use of digital technologies and the emerging potential of artificial intelligence (AI), including generative AI (GenAI) and agentic AI. Drawing on empirical research and theoretical perspectives, we explore how formative assessment--an established pedagogical practice with significant impact on student learning--has evolved alongside technological developments. We revisit a well-established framework of five key formative assessment strategies, analysing how it has been extended to integrate digital technologies and how this influences the roles of teachers, learners and tools in classroom decision-making. Our central research question asks: "How can GenAI be integrated into formative assessment practices to enhance student learning while supporting teacher agency and professional judgement?" We argue that GenAI, when critically and thoughtfully deployed, can create new opportunities for personalised feedback, dynamic learning pathways and the co-construction of knowledge between teachers and students. Moreover, GenAI's ability to support 'moments of contingency' enables teachers to respond more effectively to emerging learning needs, thus fostering self-regulation and deeper engagement. However, we stress that AI agency is agency without intelligence. The value of these technologies depends on how they are interpreted and implemented by educators, which requires ongoing reflection, collaboration and theoretical understanding. With deep implications for teacher education programmes, our analysis suggests that teacher quality in this evolving pedagogical landscape should be understood as adaptive, multifaceted and grounded in both technological fluency and sound formative assessment principles, moving beyond the narrow and prescriptive definitions that dominate recent educational policy in England. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2026 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1503314 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1503314 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Transforming Pedagogy with GenAI-Supported Formative Assessment: Challenges for Teacher Education – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Mary+Webb%22">Mary Webb</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4409-5940">0000-0002-4409-5940</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Arthur+Galamba%22">Arthur Galamba</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2208-7015">0000-0003-2208-7015</externalLink>) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22British+Journal+of+Educational+Technology%22"><i>British Journal of Educational Technology</i></searchLink>. 2026 57(3):690-706. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www.wiley.com/en-us – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 17 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2026 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Descriptive – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Artificial+Intelligence%22">Artificial Intelligence</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Technology+Uses+in+Education%22">Technology Uses in Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Formative+Evaluation%22">Formative Evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teacher+Education%22">Teacher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Change%22">Educational Change</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Technology+Integration%22">Technology Integration</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Decision+Making%22">Decision Making</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Feedback+%28Response%29%22">Feedback (Response)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Learning+Processes%22">Learning Processes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Digital+Literacy%22">Digital Literacy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Ethics%22">Ethics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teacher+Student+Relationship%22">Teacher Student Relationship</searchLink> – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1111/bjet.70051 – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 0007-1013<br />1467-8535 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: This article examines the challenges primary and secondary teachers face in implementing formative assessment, with a particular focus on the use of digital technologies and the emerging potential of artificial intelligence (AI), including generative AI (GenAI) and agentic AI. Drawing on empirical research and theoretical perspectives, we explore how formative assessment--an established pedagogical practice with significant impact on student learning--has evolved alongside technological developments. We revisit a well-established framework of five key formative assessment strategies, analysing how it has been extended to integrate digital technologies and how this influences the roles of teachers, learners and tools in classroom decision-making. Our central research question asks: "How can GenAI be integrated into formative assessment practices to enhance student learning while supporting teacher agency and professional judgement?" We argue that GenAI, when critically and thoughtfully deployed, can create new opportunities for personalised feedback, dynamic learning pathways and the co-construction of knowledge between teachers and students. Moreover, GenAI's ability to support 'moments of contingency' enables teachers to respond more effectively to emerging learning needs, thus fostering self-regulation and deeper engagement. However, we stress that AI agency is agency without intelligence. The value of these technologies depends on how they are interpreted and implemented by educators, which requires ongoing reflection, collaboration and theoretical understanding. With deep implications for teacher education programmes, our analysis suggests that teacher quality in this evolving pedagogical landscape should be understood as adaptive, multifaceted and grounded in both technological fluency and sound formative assessment principles, moving beyond the narrow and prescriptive definitions that dominate recent educational policy in England. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2026 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1503314 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1503314 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1111/bjet.70051 Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 17 StartPage: 690 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Artificial Intelligence Type: general – SubjectFull: Technology Uses in Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Formative Evaluation Type: general – SubjectFull: Teacher Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational Change Type: general – SubjectFull: Technology Integration Type: general – SubjectFull: Decision Making Type: general – SubjectFull: Feedback (Response) Type: general – SubjectFull: Learning Processes Type: general – SubjectFull: Digital Literacy Type: general – SubjectFull: Ethics Type: general – SubjectFull: Teacher Student Relationship Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Transforming Pedagogy with GenAI-Supported Formative Assessment: Challenges for Teacher Education Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Mary Webb – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Arthur Galamba IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 05 Type: published Y: 2026 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 0007-1013 – Type: issn-electronic Value: 1467-8535 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 57 – Type: issue Value: 3 Titles: – TitleFull: British Journal of Educational Technology Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |