Allocation of Low-Threshold Special Educational Support in Lower Secondary Education: The Role of Individual and Class-Level Characteristics
Saved in:
| Title: | Allocation of Low-Threshold Special Educational Support in Lower Secondary Education: The Role of Individual and Class-Level Characteristics |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Eva-Maria Holzer (ORCID |
| Source: | Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs. 2026 26(2). |
| Availability: | Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www.wiley.com/en-us |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 18 |
| Publication Date: | 2026 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Secondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Special Education, Student Characteristics, Classes (Groups of Students), Heterogeneous Grouping, Ability Grouping, Foreign Countries, Socioeconomic Status, Gender Differences, Mathematics Achievement, Behavior Problems, Student Behavior, Immigrants, Secondary School Students |
| Geographic Terms: | Switzerland |
| DOI: | 10.1111/1471-3802.70096 |
| ISSN: | 1471-3802 |
| Abstract: | It is vital that students with learning or behavioural difficulties receive special educational (SE) support from professionals. However, allocation criteria are often unclear. This issue is particularly important in lower secondary schools, where ability tracking is common and external differentiation strategies accommodate achievement differences. This cross-sectional study examines associations between low-threshold SE support and individual characteristics, class composition and school type (mixed-ability versus low-ability classes) among 941 students (aged 11-18) from 74 classrooms in German-speaking Switzerland. Logistic multilevel regression analyses revealed that SE support is more often allocated to students with low mathematics achievement, low socioeconomic status (SES), and boys, while migration background and disruptive behaviour are not significant predictors. At the classroom level, lower mean mathematics achievement is associated with a higher likelihood of SE support, although this pattern is partly explained by school type. Importantly, gender and SES remain associated with SE support even when individual mathematics achievement is considered. These findings highlight social disparities in support allocation. Merely identifying students as requiring SE support may lead to unintended consequences, such as lower expectations or stigmatization. Further research is needed to examine how structural and institutional factors determine low-threshold SE support allocation and shape students' educational trajectories. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2026 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1503925 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| Abstract: | It is vital that students with learning or behavioural difficulties receive special educational (SE) support from professionals. However, allocation criteria are often unclear. This issue is particularly important in lower secondary schools, where ability tracking is common and external differentiation strategies accommodate achievement differences. This cross-sectional study examines associations between low-threshold SE support and individual characteristics, class composition and school type (mixed-ability versus low-ability classes) among 941 students (aged 11-18) from 74 classrooms in German-speaking Switzerland. Logistic multilevel regression analyses revealed that SE support is more often allocated to students with low mathematics achievement, low socioeconomic status (SES), and boys, while migration background and disruptive behaviour are not significant predictors. At the classroom level, lower mean mathematics achievement is associated with a higher likelihood of SE support, although this pattern is partly explained by school type. Importantly, gender and SES remain associated with SE support even when individual mathematics achievement is considered. These findings highlight social disparities in support allocation. Merely identifying students as requiring SE support may lead to unintended consequences, such as lower expectations or stigmatization. Further research is needed to examine how structural and institutional factors determine low-threshold SE support allocation and shape students' educational trajectories. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1471-3802 |
| DOI: | 10.1111/1471-3802.70096 |
